股骨假体周围骨折术后治疗和预后的医院间差异

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohammad Aryaie, Jonathan T Evans, Mike Reed, Cliff Shelton, Antony Johansen, Toby O Smith, Jonathan Benn, Mark Baxter, Paul Aylin, Dawn Goodwin, Choon Key Chekar, Alex Bottle
{"title":"股骨假体周围骨折术后治疗和预后的医院间差异","authors":"Mohammad Aryaie, Jonathan T Evans, Mike Reed, Cliff Shelton, Antony Johansen, Toby O Smith, Jonathan Benn, Mark Baxter, Paul Aylin, Dawn Goodwin, Choon Key Chekar, Alex Bottle","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0050.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following hip arthroplasty pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative hospitalizations data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analyzed for patients aged 18 years and above with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day total mortality (in or out of hospital), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 39,035 hospitalized patients, 66% were female (n = 25,720), with a median age of 82 years (IQR 73 to 88). Hospital variation existed in treatment outcomes, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure of 4.0%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed hospital outliers for procedure choice after adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbidities - among 177 hospitals, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision; outlier proportions were 14.1% for length of stay, 3.9% for emergency 30-day readmission, and 1.1% for mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-hospital variation exists for the management and short-term outcomes following POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 9","pages":"1013-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Aryaie, Jonathan T Evans, Mike Reed, Cliff Shelton, Antony Johansen, Toby O Smith, Jonathan Benn, Mark Baxter, Paul Aylin, Dawn Goodwin, Choon Key Chekar, Alex Bottle\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0050.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following hip arthroplasty pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Administrative hospitalizations data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analyzed for patients aged 18 years and above with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day total mortality (in or out of hospital), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 39,035 hospitalized patients, 66% were female (n = 25,720), with a median age of 82 years (IQR 73 to 88). Hospital variation existed in treatment outcomes, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure of 4.0%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed hospital outliers for procedure choice after adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbidities - among 177 hospitals, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision; outlier proportions were 14.1% for length of stay, 3.9% for emergency 30-day readmission, and 1.1% for mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-hospital variation exists for the management and short-term outcomes following POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"1013-1021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0050.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0050.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折(POPFFs)带来了复杂的挑战,不同医疗机构的处理和结果存在差异。然而,关于这种可变性的出版文献有限,无法为改进计划提供信息。本研究旨在量化医院间手术管理和短期结果的差异。方法:分析2016年4月至2022年12月期间英国所有177家NHS医院信托基金18岁及以上原发性POPFF患者的行政住院数据。提取患者人口统计学特征、合并症、手术、住院时间、住院死亡率、30天总死亡率(院内或院外)和30天急诊全因再入院。医院和漏斗图的随机截距的多水平模型评估了医院之间在程序和结果方面的非随机差异。结果:39,035例住院患者中,66%为女性(n = 25,720),中位年龄为82岁(IQR 73 ~ 88)。治疗结果存在医院差异,未翻修固定、翻修和未手术的校正组内相关系数分别为4.0%、3.8%和2.4%。漏斗图显示,在调整了年龄、性别和合并症数量后,手术选择的医院异常值——在177家医院中,9家(5.1%)超过了固定手术的95%上限,17家(9.6%)超过了修复手术的95%上限;住院时间的异常比例为14.1%,紧急30天再入院的异常比例为3.9%,死亡率的异常比例为1.1%。结论:在英国,医院间存在着POPFFs的管理和短期预后差异。这需要进一步解释,以便更好地理解其原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Aims: Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following hip arthroplasty pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes.

Methods: Administrative hospitalizations data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analyzed for patients aged 18 years and above with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day total mortality (in or out of hospital), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes.

Results: Among 39,035 hospitalized patients, 66% were female (n = 25,720), with a median age of 82 years (IQR 73 to 88). Hospital variation existed in treatment outcomes, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure of 4.0%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed hospital outliers for procedure choice after adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbidities - among 177 hospitals, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision; outlier proportions were 14.1% for length of stay, 3.9% for emergency 30-day readmission, and 1.1% for mortality.

Conclusion: Inter-hospital variation exists for the management and short-term outcomes following POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信