内镜治疗上尿路上皮癌的结果:一项多中心国际队列分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Marian Wettstein, Surena F Matin, Craig Labbate, Aaron Potretzke, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Nirmish Singla, Maximilian Pallauf, William Huang, Shavy Nagpal, Nir Kleinmann, Asaf Shvero, Alexander Small, Benjamin Green, Jennifer Linehan, Jane Choe, Ojas Shah, Arun Rai, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Isamu Tachibana, David Canes, Aaron Perecman, Jay D Raman
{"title":"内镜治疗上尿路上皮癌的结果:一项多中心国际队列分析。","authors":"Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Marian Wettstein, Surena F Matin, Craig Labbate, Aaron Potretzke, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Nirmish Singla, Maximilian Pallauf, William Huang, Shavy Nagpal, Nir Kleinmann, Asaf Shvero, Alexander Small, Benjamin Green, Jennifer Linehan, Jane Choe, Ojas Shah, Arun Rai, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Isamu Tachibana, David Canes, Aaron Perecman, Jay D Raman","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity, often requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the standard of care. Endoscopic ablation has emerged as a kidney-sparing alternative, particularly for low-risk UTUC. Given the rarity of UTUC, generating high-quality evidence for treatment strategies remains challenging. This study presents a large, multi-institutional analysis of outcomes following primary endoscopic ablation for UTUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 432 patients across 11 institutions who underwent first-time endoscopic treatment for UTUC with curative intent between December 2003 and January 2023 was performed. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were collected. Recurrence was categorized as ipsilateral, distant, or bladder recurrence, with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 21 months, ipsilateral recurrence occurred in 232 patients (54%), while 55 (13%) developed distant metastases. The OS rate was 86%, with 29 patients (6.7%) dying within the first 12 months. On univariate analysis, the presence of a tumor not involving the renal pelvis (HR 0.71, P = 0.04) and use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) (HR 0.65, P = 0.03) were associated with lower ipsilateral recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, only UAS use remained significant (HR 0.39, P < 0.01). High-grade tumors were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 3.59, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic ablation is a feasible kidney-sparing alternative for UTUC. Ipsilateral recurrence rate is approximately 50% with over 10% of patients developing metastatic disease. UAS use may reduce UTUC recurrence risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-center international cohort analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Marian Wettstein, Surena F Matin, Craig Labbate, Aaron Potretzke, Rodrigo Rodriguez, Nirmish Singla, Maximilian Pallauf, William Huang, Shavy Nagpal, Nir Kleinmann, Asaf Shvero, Alexander Small, Benjamin Green, Jennifer Linehan, Jane Choe, Ojas Shah, Arun Rai, Hristos Kaimakliotis, Isamu Tachibana, David Canes, Aaron Perecman, Jay D Raman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity, often requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the standard of care. Endoscopic ablation has emerged as a kidney-sparing alternative, particularly for low-risk UTUC. Given the rarity of UTUC, generating high-quality evidence for treatment strategies remains challenging. This study presents a large, multi-institutional analysis of outcomes following primary endoscopic ablation for UTUC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 432 patients across 11 institutions who underwent first-time endoscopic treatment for UTUC with curative intent between December 2003 and January 2023 was performed. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were collected. Recurrence was categorized as ipsilateral, distant, or bladder recurrence, with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 21 months, ipsilateral recurrence occurred in 232 patients (54%), while 55 (13%) developed distant metastases. The OS rate was 86%, with 29 patients (6.7%) dying within the first 12 months. On univariate analysis, the presence of a tumor not involving the renal pelvis (HR 0.71, P = 0.04) and use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) (HR 0.65, P = 0.03) were associated with lower ipsilateral recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, only UAS use remained significant (HR 0.39, P < 0.01). High-grade tumors were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 3.59, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic ablation is a feasible kidney-sparing alternative for UTUC. Ipsilateral recurrence rate is approximately 50% with over 10% of patients developing metastatic disease. UAS use may reduce UTUC recurrence risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)是一种罕见的侵袭性恶性肿瘤,发病率高,通常需要根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)作为标准治疗。内镜消融已成为一种保留肾脏的替代方法,特别是对于低风险的UTUC。鉴于UTUC的罕见性,为治疗策略提供高质量的证据仍然具有挑战性。本研究对UTUC初次内镜消融后的结果进行了大型、多机构的分析。方法:回顾性分析2003年12月至2023年1月间11家医院首次内镜治疗UTUC的432例患者。收集基线人口统计学、肿瘤特征和手术细节。复发分为同侧复发、远处复发或膀胱复发,以总生存期(OS)为主要终点。使用单因素和多因素Cox回归模型来确定复发和生存的预测因素。结果:在21个月的中位随访中,232例患者(54%)发生同侧复发,55例(13%)发生远处转移。总生存率为86%,29例(6.7%)患者在前12个月内死亡。在单因素分析中,未累及肾盂的肿瘤(HR 0.71, P = 0.04)和输尿管通路鞘(HR 0.65, P = 0.03)与较低的同侧复发率相关。在多变量分析中,只有UAS的使用仍然显著(HR 0.39, P < 0.01)。高级别肿瘤与较差的OS显著相关(HR 3.59, P < 0.01)。结论:内镜下消融术是一种可行的保肾方法。同侧复发率约为50%,超过10%的患者发展为转移性疾病。使用UAS可降低UTUC复发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-center international cohort analysis.

Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with significant morbidity, often requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the standard of care. Endoscopic ablation has emerged as a kidney-sparing alternative, particularly for low-risk UTUC. Given the rarity of UTUC, generating high-quality evidence for treatment strategies remains challenging. This study presents a large, multi-institutional analysis of outcomes following primary endoscopic ablation for UTUC.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 432 patients across 11 institutions who underwent first-time endoscopic treatment for UTUC with curative intent between December 2003 and January 2023 was performed. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were collected. Recurrence was categorized as ipsilateral, distant, or bladder recurrence, with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of recurrence and survival.

Results: At a median follow-up of 21 months, ipsilateral recurrence occurred in 232 patients (54%), while 55 (13%) developed distant metastases. The OS rate was 86%, with 29 patients (6.7%) dying within the first 12 months. On univariate analysis, the presence of a tumor not involving the renal pelvis (HR 0.71, P = 0.04) and use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) (HR 0.65, P = 0.03) were associated with lower ipsilateral recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, only UAS use remained significant (HR 0.39, P < 0.01). High-grade tumors were significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 3.59, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Endoscopic ablation is a feasible kidney-sparing alternative for UTUC. Ipsilateral recurrence rate is approximately 50% with over 10% of patients developing metastatic disease. UAS use may reduce UTUC recurrence risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信