根治性前列腺切除术结果的自动电子病历提取算法。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Maximilian J Rabil, Michael Jalfon, Peter Palencia, Dylan Heckscher, Victoria Kong, Aleksandra Golos, Rhys Richmond, Adam Chess, Isaac Y Kim, Michael S Leapman, Jaime A Cavallo
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术结果的自动电子病历提取算法。","authors":"Maximilian J Rabil, Michael Jalfon, Peter Palencia, Dylan Heckscher, Victoria Kong, Aleksandra Golos, Rhys Richmond, Adam Chess, Isaac Y Kim, Michael S Leapman, Jaime A Cavallo","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Variation in outcomes following radical prostatectomy and inclusion of prostate cancer surgery metrics in hospital ratings signal need for procedure-specific quality improvement (QI) efforts. We hypothesized that a novel electronic medical record (EMR)-based, automated algorithm-driven algorithm for surgical outcomes and quality metrics following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) would demonstrate >90% sensitivity and specificity and significant inter-rater reliability (IRR) with National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) abstraction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We developed an algorithm to automatically abstract RALP outcomes and quality metrics retrospectively from the EMR. Pathology results were abstracted through text extraction; surgical outcomes were abstracted using ICD-10 codes, CPT codes, and EMR data variables. Sensitivity, specificity, and IRR between the algorithm and NSQIP-abstraction were assessed using Cohen's kappa with statistical significance set P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 927 cases were mutually tracked. IRR was highest for mortality (k = 1.00) and lowest for dialysis and ureteral obstruction (k = 0.00). IRR was fair for: sepsis (k = 0.28), renal insufficiency (k = 0.32), and prolonged NGT/NPO (k = 0.39); moderate: UTI (k = 0.50) and stage (k = 0.53); substantial: surgical margins (k = 0.94), urine leak (k = 0.60), C-Diff (k = 0.67), pneumonia (k = 0.80). Sensitivity of the algorithm was > 90% for all mutually tracked outcomes except rectal injury (0%) and specificity was >97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel algorithm for RALP outcomes matches or exceeds sensitivity and specificity of institutional NSQIP abstraction for all but 1 variable. Substantial agreement between the algorithm and NSQIP supports automated extraction of outcome metrics as an acceptable replacement for trained abstractors, and broader application provides opportunities to facilitate and reduce cost of outcomes and quality metric benchmarking.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated electronic medical record abstraction algorithm for radical prostatectomy outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian J Rabil, Michael Jalfon, Peter Palencia, Dylan Heckscher, Victoria Kong, Aleksandra Golos, Rhys Richmond, Adam Chess, Isaac Y Kim, Michael S Leapman, Jaime A Cavallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Variation in outcomes following radical prostatectomy and inclusion of prostate cancer surgery metrics in hospital ratings signal need for procedure-specific quality improvement (QI) efforts. We hypothesized that a novel electronic medical record (EMR)-based, automated algorithm-driven algorithm for surgical outcomes and quality metrics following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) would demonstrate >90% sensitivity and specificity and significant inter-rater reliability (IRR) with National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) abstraction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We developed an algorithm to automatically abstract RALP outcomes and quality metrics retrospectively from the EMR. Pathology results were abstracted through text extraction; surgical outcomes were abstracted using ICD-10 codes, CPT codes, and EMR data variables. Sensitivity, specificity, and IRR between the algorithm and NSQIP-abstraction were assessed using Cohen's kappa with statistical significance set P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of 927 cases were mutually tracked. IRR was highest for mortality (k = 1.00) and lowest for dialysis and ureteral obstruction (k = 0.00). IRR was fair for: sepsis (k = 0.28), renal insufficiency (k = 0.32), and prolonged NGT/NPO (k = 0.39); moderate: UTI (k = 0.50) and stage (k = 0.53); substantial: surgical margins (k = 0.94), urine leak (k = 0.60), C-Diff (k = 0.67), pneumonia (k = 0.80). Sensitivity of the algorithm was > 90% for all mutually tracked outcomes except rectal injury (0%) and specificity was >97%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel algorithm for RALP outcomes matches or exceeds sensitivity and specificity of institutional NSQIP abstraction for all but 1 variable. Substantial agreement between the algorithm and NSQIP supports automated extraction of outcome metrics as an acceptable replacement for trained abstractors, and broader application provides opportunities to facilitate and reduce cost of outcomes and quality metric benchmarking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根治性前列腺切除术后预后的变化和将前列腺癌手术指标纳入医院评分表明需要进行特定手术质量改进(QI)的努力。我们假设一种新型的基于电子病历(EMR)的自动算法驱动算法,用于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)后的手术结果和质量指标,在国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)抽象下,将显示出b> 90%的灵敏度和特异性以及显著的评分间可靠性(IRR)。研究设计:我们开发了一种算法来自动从EMR中提取RALP结果和质量指标。通过文本提取提取病理结果;采用ICD-10编码、CPT编码和EMR数据变量对手术结果进行抽象。采用Cohen’s kappa评价算法与nsqip提取算法的敏感性、特异性和IRR, P < 0.05。结果:共相互追踪927例。死亡率的IRR最高(k = 1.00),透析和输尿管梗阻的IRR最低(k = 0.00)。对于脓毒症(k = 0.28)、肾功能不全(k = 0.32)和NGT/NPO延长(k = 0.39), IRR是公平的;中度:UTI (k = 0.50)和分期(k = 0.53);实质性:手术缘(k = 0.94)、尿漏(k = 0.60)、C-Diff (k = 0.67)、肺炎(k = 0.80)。除直肠损伤(0%)外,该算法对所有相互跟踪结果的敏感性为> 90%,特异性为>97%。结论:这种新的RALP结果算法在除1个变量外的所有变量上都符合或超过了机构NSQIP抽象的敏感性和特异性。算法和NSQIP之间的实质性协议支持结果度量的自动提取,作为训练有素的抽象人员的可接受替代品,并且更广泛的应用为促进和降低结果和质量度量基准的成本提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated electronic medical record abstraction algorithm for radical prostatectomy outcomes.

Objective: Variation in outcomes following radical prostatectomy and inclusion of prostate cancer surgery metrics in hospital ratings signal need for procedure-specific quality improvement (QI) efforts. We hypothesized that a novel electronic medical record (EMR)-based, automated algorithm-driven algorithm for surgical outcomes and quality metrics following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) would demonstrate >90% sensitivity and specificity and significant inter-rater reliability (IRR) with National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) abstraction.

Study design: We developed an algorithm to automatically abstract RALP outcomes and quality metrics retrospectively from the EMR. Pathology results were abstracted through text extraction; surgical outcomes were abstracted using ICD-10 codes, CPT codes, and EMR data variables. Sensitivity, specificity, and IRR between the algorithm and NSQIP-abstraction were assessed using Cohen's kappa with statistical significance set P < 0.05.

Results: Total of 927 cases were mutually tracked. IRR was highest for mortality (k = 1.00) and lowest for dialysis and ureteral obstruction (k = 0.00). IRR was fair for: sepsis (k = 0.28), renal insufficiency (k = 0.32), and prolonged NGT/NPO (k = 0.39); moderate: UTI (k = 0.50) and stage (k = 0.53); substantial: surgical margins (k = 0.94), urine leak (k = 0.60), C-Diff (k = 0.67), pneumonia (k = 0.80). Sensitivity of the algorithm was > 90% for all mutually tracked outcomes except rectal injury (0%) and specificity was >97%.

Conclusion: This novel algorithm for RALP outcomes matches or exceeds sensitivity and specificity of institutional NSQIP abstraction for all but 1 variable. Substantial agreement between the algorithm and NSQIP supports automated extraction of outcome metrics as an acceptable replacement for trained abstractors, and broader application provides opportunities to facilitate and reduce cost of outcomes and quality metric benchmarking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信