Sugammadex或新斯的明预防腹部或胸部大手术术后肺部并发症:SINFONIA (Sugammadex for prevention of post-operative pulmonary并发症)随机对照优势试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08987-4
Jonathan A Silversides, Louise Savic, Louise Hiller, Amy Hopkins, Katie Booth, Jennifer Dorey, Richard Smithson, James Mason, Samuel Frempong, Christina May, Ramani Moonesinghe, Ciara M O'Donnell, Benedict Creagh-Brown, Rebecca Kandiyali, Joyce Yeung, Rupert Pearse
{"title":"Sugammadex或新斯的明预防腹部或胸部大手术术后肺部并发症:SINFONIA (Sugammadex for prevention of post-operative pulmonary并发症)随机对照优势试验的研究方案。","authors":"Jonathan A Silversides, Louise Savic, Louise Hiller, Amy Hopkins, Katie Booth, Jennifer Dorey, Richard Smithson, James Mason, Samuel Frempong, Christina May, Ramani Moonesinghe, Ciara M O'Donnell, Benedict Creagh-Brown, Rebecca Kandiyali, Joyce Yeung, Rupert Pearse","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08987-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is an important risk factor for PPCs. The incomplete reversal of this neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery leads to residual weakness of respiratory muscles and predisposes to aspiration of pharyngeal contents, hypoventilation, and thus to PPCs such as atelectasis and pneumonia. Two reversal drugs for neuromuscular blocking agents are available: neostigmine and sugammadex. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex use results in more rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and small clinical efficacy studies have suggested an associated lower incidence of PPCs. The comparative clinical effectiveness of the two drugs in reducing length of hospital stay or mortality is uncertain. Moreover, a potential safety concern with sugammadex is the relatively high incidence of life-threatening allergic reactions in countries where this drug has been widely used over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SINFONIA is a pragmatic, randomised, open-label, parallel group, superiority trial with an internal pilot which aims to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the two available drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blockade, sugammadex and neostigmine, in patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major abdominal or non-cardiac thoracic surgery. The trial will randomise 2500 patients from approximately 40 centres in the UK. The primary outcome will be days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAH-30), with key secondary outcomes of PPC incidence, quality of life, and mortality up to 180 days. An embedded observational study will investigate the rate of allergic sensitisation following exposure to sugammadex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SINFONIA trial addresses an important question for anaesthetists and for patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The choice of reversal agent for neuromuscular blockade between sugammadex and neostigmine is currently largely a matter of anaesthetist preference. A growing body of evidence suggests that sugammadex may reduce the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications relative to neostigmine. This pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial will provide robust evidence as to the effects of the two drugs on patient-centred outcomes such as DAH-30, as well as on cost effectiveness and the incidence of allergic sensitisation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on the ISRCTN database ( https://www.isrctn.com ) prior to opening to recruitment (registration no 15109717).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sugammadex or Neostigmine for prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications after major abdominal or thoracic surgery: study protocol for the SINFONIA (Sugammadex for preventioN oF pOst-operative pulmonary complIcAtions) randomised controlled superiority trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan A Silversides, Louise Savic, Louise Hiller, Amy Hopkins, Katie Booth, Jennifer Dorey, Richard Smithson, James Mason, Samuel Frempong, Christina May, Ramani Moonesinghe, Ciara M O'Donnell, Benedict Creagh-Brown, Rebecca Kandiyali, Joyce Yeung, Rupert Pearse\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08987-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is an important risk factor for PPCs. The incomplete reversal of this neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery leads to residual weakness of respiratory muscles and predisposes to aspiration of pharyngeal contents, hypoventilation, and thus to PPCs such as atelectasis and pneumonia. Two reversal drugs for neuromuscular blocking agents are available: neostigmine and sugammadex. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex use results in more rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and small clinical efficacy studies have suggested an associated lower incidence of PPCs. The comparative clinical effectiveness of the two drugs in reducing length of hospital stay or mortality is uncertain. Moreover, a potential safety concern with sugammadex is the relatively high incidence of life-threatening allergic reactions in countries where this drug has been widely used over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SINFONIA is a pragmatic, randomised, open-label, parallel group, superiority trial with an internal pilot which aims to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the two available drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blockade, sugammadex and neostigmine, in patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major abdominal or non-cardiac thoracic surgery. The trial will randomise 2500 patients from approximately 40 centres in the UK. The primary outcome will be days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAH-30), with key secondary outcomes of PPC incidence, quality of life, and mortality up to 180 days. An embedded observational study will investigate the rate of allergic sensitisation following exposure to sugammadex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SINFONIA trial addresses an important question for anaesthetists and for patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The choice of reversal agent for neuromuscular blockade between sugammadex and neostigmine is currently largely a matter of anaesthetist preference. A growing body of evidence suggests that sugammadex may reduce the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications relative to neostigmine. This pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial will provide robust evidence as to the effects of the two drugs on patient-centred outcomes such as DAH-30, as well as on cost effectiveness and the incidence of allergic sensitisation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on the ISRCTN database ( https://www.isrctn.com ) prior to opening to recruitment (registration no 15109717).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08987-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08987-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后肺部并发症(PPCs)是重大胸腹外科手术后发病率和死亡率的重要来源。全身麻醉中神经肌肉阻断药物的使用是PPCs发生的重要危险因素。手术结束时这种神经肌肉阻断的不完全逆转会导致呼吸肌残留无力,并容易导致咽内容物误吸、通气不足,从而导致肺不张和肺炎等PPCs。神经肌肉阻滞剂有两种逆转药物:新斯的明和糖马德。与新斯的明相比,使用sugammadex可以更快地逆转神经肌肉阻滞,小型临床疗效研究表明PPCs的发生率较低。两种药物在减少住院时间或死亡率方面的比较临床效果尚不确定。此外,sugammadex的一个潜在安全问题是,在过去十年中广泛使用该药物的国家,危及生命的过敏反应的发生率相对较高。方法:SINFONIA是一项实用、随机、开放标签、平行组、内部试点的优势试验,旨在比较50岁或以上接受重大腹部或非心脏胸外科手术的患者中两种可用药物sugammadex和新斯的明逆转神经肌肉阻断的临床和成本效益。该试验将从英国约40个中心随机抽取2500名患者。主要终点是存活天数和30天出院天数(DAH-30),关键的次要终点是PPC发病率、生活质量和直至180天的死亡率。一项嵌入式观察性研究将调查暴露于糖madex后的过敏性致敏率。讨论:sinonia试验解决了麻醉师和接受重大腹部和胸部手术的患者的一个重要问题。神经肌肉阻断的逆转剂在糖马德和新斯的明之间的选择目前主要是麻醉师的偏好问题。越来越多的证据表明,相对于新斯的明,sugammadex可以减少术后肺部并发症的发生率。这项实用的临床有效性试验将提供强有力的证据,证明这两种药物对以患者为中心的结果(如DAH-30)的影响,以及对成本效益和过敏致敏发生率的影响。试验注册:试验在开始招募之前在ISRCTN数据库(https://www.isrctn.com)上注册(注册号15109717)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sugammadex or Neostigmine for prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications after major abdominal or thoracic surgery: study protocol for the SINFONIA (Sugammadex for preventioN oF pOst-operative pulmonary complIcAtions) randomised controlled superiority trial.

Background: Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is an important risk factor for PPCs. The incomplete reversal of this neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery leads to residual weakness of respiratory muscles and predisposes to aspiration of pharyngeal contents, hypoventilation, and thus to PPCs such as atelectasis and pneumonia. Two reversal drugs for neuromuscular blocking agents are available: neostigmine and sugammadex. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex use results in more rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and small clinical efficacy studies have suggested an associated lower incidence of PPCs. The comparative clinical effectiveness of the two drugs in reducing length of hospital stay or mortality is uncertain. Moreover, a potential safety concern with sugammadex is the relatively high incidence of life-threatening allergic reactions in countries where this drug has been widely used over the last decade.

Methods: SINFONIA is a pragmatic, randomised, open-label, parallel group, superiority trial with an internal pilot which aims to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the two available drugs for reversal of neuromuscular blockade, sugammadex and neostigmine, in patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major abdominal or non-cardiac thoracic surgery. The trial will randomise 2500 patients from approximately 40 centres in the UK. The primary outcome will be days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAH-30), with key secondary outcomes of PPC incidence, quality of life, and mortality up to 180 days. An embedded observational study will investigate the rate of allergic sensitisation following exposure to sugammadex.

Discussion: The SINFONIA trial addresses an important question for anaesthetists and for patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgery. The choice of reversal agent for neuromuscular blockade between sugammadex and neostigmine is currently largely a matter of anaesthetist preference. A growing body of evidence suggests that sugammadex may reduce the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications relative to neostigmine. This pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial will provide robust evidence as to the effects of the two drugs on patient-centred outcomes such as DAH-30, as well as on cost effectiveness and the incidence of allergic sensitisation.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on the ISRCTN database ( https://www.isrctn.com ) prior to opening to recruitment (registration no 15109717).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信