无插管困难预测因素的患者院前急诊插管时,Bougie与单独气管插管对首次插管成功率的影响:BETA随机对照试验方案

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09046-8
Quentin Le Bastard, Joel Jenvrin, Aurélie Gaultier, Emmanuel Montassier
{"title":"无插管困难预测因素的患者院前急诊插管时,Bougie与单独气管插管对首次插管成功率的影响:BETA随机对照试验方案","authors":"Quentin Le Bastard, Joel Jenvrin, Aurélie Gaultier, Emmanuel Montassier","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09046-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital airway management is a critical and high-risk procedure in emergency medicine. First-pass intubation success is essential to reduce complications such as hypoxemia, aspiration, and hemodynamic instability. Although the bougie is commonly used in inhospital settings for difficult intubations, its routine use in first-attempt prehospital intubation in patients without difficult airway predictors has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BETA study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded superiority trial comparing bougie-assisted intubation with standard endotracheal tube intubation in adult patients (≥ 18 years) requiring prehospital intubation without predictors of difficult airway. A total of 710 participants will be randomized (1:1) across 10 French mobile intensive care units (MICUs). The primary outcome is first-attempt intubation success. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, glottic view, procedure duration, desaturation, perceived difficulty, and airway injuries. Data will be analyzed using logistic regression with a mixed model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will be the first to assess whether the routine use of a bougie improves first-attempt intubation success in prehospital settings. If successful, the intervention could shape future airway management practices.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06307392. Registered on March 26, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bougie versus endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success in prehospital emergency intubation in patients without predictors of difficult intubation: protocol for the BETA randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Le Bastard, Joel Jenvrin, Aurélie Gaultier, Emmanuel Montassier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09046-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital airway management is a critical and high-risk procedure in emergency medicine. First-pass intubation success is essential to reduce complications such as hypoxemia, aspiration, and hemodynamic instability. Although the bougie is commonly used in inhospital settings for difficult intubations, its routine use in first-attempt prehospital intubation in patients without difficult airway predictors has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BETA study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded superiority trial comparing bougie-assisted intubation with standard endotracheal tube intubation in adult patients (≥ 18 years) requiring prehospital intubation without predictors of difficult airway. A total of 710 participants will be randomized (1:1) across 10 French mobile intensive care units (MICUs). The primary outcome is first-attempt intubation success. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, glottic view, procedure duration, desaturation, perceived difficulty, and airway injuries. Data will be analyzed using logistic regression with a mixed model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will be the first to assess whether the routine use of a bougie improves first-attempt intubation success in prehospital settings. If successful, the intervention could shape future airway management practices.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06307392. Registered on March 26, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403556/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09046-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09046-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:院前气道管理是急诊医学中一项关键且高风险的程序。首次插管成功对于减少低氧血症、误吸和血流动力学不稳定等并发症至关重要。尽管bougie通常用于医院内困难插管,但其在无困难气道预测因子的患者首次院前插管中的常规使用尚未在随机对照试验中进行评估。方法:BETA研究是一项多中心、随机、对照、单盲的优越性试验,比较布基辅助插管与标准气管插管对需要院前插管且无气道困难预测因子的成年患者(≥18岁)的疗效。共有710名参与者将在10个法国移动重症监护病房(micu)中随机分配(1:1)。主要结果是首次插管成功。次要结局包括不良事件、声门视野、手术时间、去饱和、感知困难和气道损伤。数据将使用混合模型的逻辑回归进行分析。讨论:本试验将首次评估常规使用bougie是否能提高院前首次插管成功率。如果成功,该干预措施将影响未来的气道管理实践。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06307392。于2024年3月26日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bougie versus endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success in prehospital emergency intubation in patients without predictors of difficult intubation: protocol for the BETA randomized controlled trial.

Bougie versus endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success in prehospital emergency intubation in patients without predictors of difficult intubation: protocol for the BETA randomized controlled trial.

Background: Prehospital airway management is a critical and high-risk procedure in emergency medicine. First-pass intubation success is essential to reduce complications such as hypoxemia, aspiration, and hemodynamic instability. Although the bougie is commonly used in inhospital settings for difficult intubations, its routine use in first-attempt prehospital intubation in patients without difficult airway predictors has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials.

Methods: The BETA study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, single-blinded superiority trial comparing bougie-assisted intubation with standard endotracheal tube intubation in adult patients (≥ 18 years) requiring prehospital intubation without predictors of difficult airway. A total of 710 participants will be randomized (1:1) across 10 French mobile intensive care units (MICUs). The primary outcome is first-attempt intubation success. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, glottic view, procedure duration, desaturation, perceived difficulty, and airway injuries. Data will be analyzed using logistic regression with a mixed model.

Discussion: This trial will be the first to assess whether the routine use of a bougie improves first-attempt intubation success in prehospital settings. If successful, the intervention could shape future airway management practices.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06307392. Registered on March 26, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信