采用Hugo™RAS系统的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:包括中度至高度复杂肾肿块的单中心队列围手术期结果

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Francesco Prata, Salvatore Basile, Francesco Tedesco, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Alessandro De Giuseppe, Marco Ricci, Pasquale Callè, Valeriu Rosca, Alfredo Travino, Angelo Civitella, Rocco Papalia
{"title":"采用Hugo™RAS系统的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:包括中度至高度复杂肾肿块的单中心队列围手术期结果","authors":"Francesco Prata, Salvatore Basile, Francesco Tedesco, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Alessandro De Giuseppe, Marco Ricci, Pasquale Callè, Valeriu Rosca, Alfredo Travino, Angelo Civitella, Rocco Papalia","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the perioperative and early functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using the Hugo™ RAS System in a consecutive single-center cohort of patients, including a subgroup of moderate-to-high complexity renal masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 80 consecutive patients who underwent off-clamp RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System between October 2022 and October 2024. Tumor complexity was evaluated using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Perioperative variables, pathological data, and renal function were collected. The primary endpoint was to explore the safety and feasibility of the Hugo™ RAS System in nephron-sparing surgery. Trifecta achievement was defined as negative surgical margins, no Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa complications, and ≤30% eGFR decline at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 53 males and 27 females, with a median age of 63 years. Median tumor size was 32.5 mm at CT scan; 70% of tumors were classified as cT1a while 36 patients had moderate (score 7-9) or highly complex (score ≥10) renal masses. Median operative time was 105.5 minutes, docking time 4 minutes, console time 53 minutes, and estimated blood loss 200 mL. No conversions or major intraoperative complications were recorded. Overall complication rate was 15%, with 1.3% major complications. Negative surgical margins were obtained in 96.2% of cases. Median eGFR at discharge was comparable to baseline (P = 0.65). Trifecta was achieved in 78.8% of the full cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPN using the Hugo™ RAS System is a feasible and safe option for the management of renal masses, including complex cases. The platform demonstrated preliminary favorable perioperative outcomes, low complication rates, and satisfactory preservation of renal function even in a moderate-to-highly complex setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: Perioperative outcomes from a single-center cohort including moderate-to-highly complex renal masses.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Prata, Salvatore Basile, Francesco Tedesco, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Alessandro De Giuseppe, Marco Ricci, Pasquale Callè, Valeriu Rosca, Alfredo Travino, Angelo Civitella, Rocco Papalia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the perioperative and early functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using the Hugo™ RAS System in a consecutive single-center cohort of patients, including a subgroup of moderate-to-high complexity renal masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 80 consecutive patients who underwent off-clamp RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System between October 2022 and October 2024. Tumor complexity was evaluated using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Perioperative variables, pathological data, and renal function were collected. The primary endpoint was to explore the safety and feasibility of the Hugo™ RAS System in nephron-sparing surgery. Trifecta achievement was defined as negative surgical margins, no Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa complications, and ≤30% eGFR decline at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 53 males and 27 females, with a median age of 63 years. Median tumor size was 32.5 mm at CT scan; 70% of tumors were classified as cT1a while 36 patients had moderate (score 7-9) or highly complex (score ≥10) renal masses. Median operative time was 105.5 minutes, docking time 4 minutes, console time 53 minutes, and estimated blood loss 200 mL. No conversions or major intraoperative complications were recorded. Overall complication rate was 15%, with 1.3% major complications. Negative surgical margins were obtained in 96.2% of cases. Median eGFR at discharge was comparable to baseline (P = 0.65). Trifecta was achieved in 78.8% of the full cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPN using the Hugo™ RAS System is a feasible and safe option for the management of renal masses, including complex cases. The platform demonstrated preliminary favorable perioperative outcomes, low complication rates, and satisfactory preservation of renal function even in a moderate-to-highly complex setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的围手术期和早期功能预后,使用Hugo™RAS系统在连续的单中心队列患者中进行,包括一个中度至高度复杂性肾肿块亚组。方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年10月至2024年10月期间连续80例使用Hugo™RAS系统进行脱钳RAPN的患者。采用R.E.N.A.L.肾测量评分评估肿瘤复杂性。收集围手术期变量、病理资料及肾功能。主要终点是探讨Hugo™RAS系统在保留肾元手术中的安全性和可行性。三连用的定义为手术切界阴性,无Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa并发症,出院时eGFR下降≤30%。结果:该队列包括男性53例,女性27例,中位年龄63岁。CT扫描中位肿瘤大小为32.5 mm;70%的肿瘤分类为cT1a, 36例患者为中度(评分7-9)或高度复杂(评分≥10)肾肿块。中位手术时间105.5分钟,对接时间4分钟,控制台时间53分钟,估计失血量200 mL。无转归及主要术中并发症记录。总并发症率为15%,主要并发症1.3%。96.2%的病例手术切缘呈阴性。出院时中位eGFR与基线相当(P = 0.65)。78.8%的全队列患者获得了三连片治疗。结论:采用Hugo™RAS系统的RAPN是治疗肾包块(包括复杂病例)的一种可行且安全的选择。该平台初步证明了良好的围手术期结果,低并发症发生率,即使在中度至高度复杂的环境中也能令人满意地保存肾功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: Perioperative outcomes from a single-center cohort including moderate-to-highly complex renal masses.

Purpose: To evaluate the perioperative and early functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using the Hugo™ RAS System in a consecutive single-center cohort of patients, including a subgroup of moderate-to-high complexity renal masses.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 consecutive patients who underwent off-clamp RAPN with the Hugo™ RAS System between October 2022 and October 2024. Tumor complexity was evaluated using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Perioperative variables, pathological data, and renal function were collected. The primary endpoint was to explore the safety and feasibility of the Hugo™ RAS System in nephron-sparing surgery. Trifecta achievement was defined as negative surgical margins, no Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa complications, and ≤30% eGFR decline at discharge.

Results: The cohort included 53 males and 27 females, with a median age of 63 years. Median tumor size was 32.5 mm at CT scan; 70% of tumors were classified as cT1a while 36 patients had moderate (score 7-9) or highly complex (score ≥10) renal masses. Median operative time was 105.5 minutes, docking time 4 minutes, console time 53 minutes, and estimated blood loss 200 mL. No conversions or major intraoperative complications were recorded. Overall complication rate was 15%, with 1.3% major complications. Negative surgical margins were obtained in 96.2% of cases. Median eGFR at discharge was comparable to baseline (P = 0.65). Trifecta was achieved in 78.8% of the full cohort.

Conclusions: RAPN using the Hugo™ RAS System is a feasible and safe option for the management of renal masses, including complex cases. The platform demonstrated preliminary favorable perioperative outcomes, low complication rates, and satisfactory preservation of renal function even in a moderate-to-highly complex setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信