Vincenzo D'Ambra, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Ingaldi, Laura Alberici, Riccardo Casadei
{"title":"胰导管腺癌手术患者长期生存的预测因素:文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Vincenzo D'Ambra, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Ingaldi, Laura Alberici, Riccardo Casadei","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02382-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term survivors after pancreatic resection for PDAC are rare, constituting a specific subset of patients that remains poorly understood. This study aims to identify the clinic-pathological, molecular, and therapeutic factors for predicting long-term survival (LTS). A systematic review and random-effect meta-analysis were conducted. Inclusion criteria were PDAC histology, resected patients, studies reporting risk factors, and comparing two groups. The primary endpoint was to evaluate predictive factors for LTS in patients with PDAC who underwent surgery. Results were reported with the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model using Risk Ratio (RR) or Mean Difference (MD). Meta-regression analysis was used to clarify heterogeneity. Nineteen studies, involving a total of 5412 patients, were included: 1097 (20,3%) in group LTS and 4334 (79,7%) in group STS (short-term survivors). These factors were associated to LTS: small size (RR 1.53, 95% IC 1.14; 2.05); T1-T2 stage (RR 1.07, 95% IC 1.03; 1.11); N0 (RR 1.82, 95% IC 1.60; 2.09); AJCC Stage I (RR 2.28 95% IC 1.87; 2.79); low-grade G1-2 (RR 1.21, 95% IC 1.09; 1.34); R0 resection (RR 1.11, 95% IC 1.08; 1.13); low levels of CEA (MD - 4.41, 95% IC - 6.23; - 2.59) and Ca 19.9 (MD - 66.4, 95% IC: - 71.9; - 60.9); absence of perineural invasion (RR 0.93, 95% IC: 0.90; 0.96), lymph-vascular invasion (RR 0.87, 95% IC: 0.83; 0.91), venous invasion (RR 0.63, 95% IC: 0.48; 0.83) and perioperative transfusions (RR 0.56, 95% IC: 0.40; 0.79). Several factors are associated with an LTS. They can be considered reliable indicators for predicting tumor progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive factors for long-term survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that underwent surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo D'Ambra, Claudio Ricci, Carlo Ingaldi, Laura Alberici, Riccardo Casadei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02382-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Long-term survivors after pancreatic resection for PDAC are rare, constituting a specific subset of patients that remains poorly understood. This study aims to identify the clinic-pathological, molecular, and therapeutic factors for predicting long-term survival (LTS). A systematic review and random-effect meta-analysis were conducted. Inclusion criteria were PDAC histology, resected patients, studies reporting risk factors, and comparing two groups. The primary endpoint was to evaluate predictive factors for LTS in patients with PDAC who underwent surgery. Results were reported with the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model using Risk Ratio (RR) or Mean Difference (MD). Meta-regression analysis was used to clarify heterogeneity. Nineteen studies, involving a total of 5412 patients, were included: 1097 (20,3%) in group LTS and 4334 (79,7%) in group STS (short-term survivors). These factors were associated to LTS: small size (RR 1.53, 95% IC 1.14; 2.05); T1-T2 stage (RR 1.07, 95% IC 1.03; 1.11); N0 (RR 1.82, 95% IC 1.60; 2.09); AJCC Stage I (RR 2.28 95% IC 1.87; 2.79); low-grade G1-2 (RR 1.21, 95% IC 1.09; 1.34); R0 resection (RR 1.11, 95% IC 1.08; 1.13); low levels of CEA (MD - 4.41, 95% IC - 6.23; - 2.59) and Ca 19.9 (MD - 66.4, 95% IC: - 71.9; - 60.9); absence of perineural invasion (RR 0.93, 95% IC: 0.90; 0.96), lymph-vascular invasion (RR 0.87, 95% IC: 0.83; 0.91), venous invasion (RR 0.63, 95% IC: 0.48; 0.83) and perioperative transfusions (RR 0.56, 95% IC: 0.40; 0.79). Several factors are associated with an LTS. They can be considered reliable indicators for predicting tumor progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02382-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02382-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
胰腺切除术后PDAC的长期幸存者是罕见的,构成了一个特定的亚群患者仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在确定预测长期生存(LTS)的临床病理、分子和治疗因素。进行了系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析。纳入标准为PDAC组织学、切除患者、报告危险因素的研究以及两组比较。主要终点是评估手术后PDAC患者LTS的预测因素。结果采用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型,采用风险比(RR)或平均差(MD)。meta回归分析用于澄清异质性。19项研究共纳入5412例患者:LTS组1097例(20.3%),STS组4334例(79.7%)(短期幸存者)。这些因素与LTS相关:体积小(RR 1.53, 95% IC 1.14; 2.05);T1-T2期(RR 1.07, 95% IC 1.03; 1.11);N0 (rr 1.82, 95% IC 1.60; 2.09);AJCC I期(RR 2.28 95% IC 1.87; 2.79);低分级G1-2 (RR 1.21, 95% IC 1.09; 1.34);R0切除(RR 1.11, 95% IC 1.08; 1.13);低水平的CEA (MD - 4.41, 95% IC - 6.23, - 2.59)和19.9 Ca (MD - 66.4, 95% IC: - 71.9, - 60.9);无神经周围浸润(RR 0.93, 95% IC: 0.90; 0.96)、淋巴血管浸润(RR 0.87, 95% IC: 0.83; 0.91)、静脉浸润(RR 0.63, 95% IC: 0.48; 0.83)、围手术期输血(RR 0.56, 95% IC: 0.40; 0.79)。有几个因素与LTS有关。它们可以被认为是预测肿瘤进展的可靠指标。
Predictive factors for long-term survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that underwent surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature.
Long-term survivors after pancreatic resection for PDAC are rare, constituting a specific subset of patients that remains poorly understood. This study aims to identify the clinic-pathological, molecular, and therapeutic factors for predicting long-term survival (LTS). A systematic review and random-effect meta-analysis were conducted. Inclusion criteria were PDAC histology, resected patients, studies reporting risk factors, and comparing two groups. The primary endpoint was to evaluate predictive factors for LTS in patients with PDAC who underwent surgery. Results were reported with the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model using Risk Ratio (RR) or Mean Difference (MD). Meta-regression analysis was used to clarify heterogeneity. Nineteen studies, involving a total of 5412 patients, were included: 1097 (20,3%) in group LTS and 4334 (79,7%) in group STS (short-term survivors). These factors were associated to LTS: small size (RR 1.53, 95% IC 1.14; 2.05); T1-T2 stage (RR 1.07, 95% IC 1.03; 1.11); N0 (RR 1.82, 95% IC 1.60; 2.09); AJCC Stage I (RR 2.28 95% IC 1.87; 2.79); low-grade G1-2 (RR 1.21, 95% IC 1.09; 1.34); R0 resection (RR 1.11, 95% IC 1.08; 1.13); low levels of CEA (MD - 4.41, 95% IC - 6.23; - 2.59) and Ca 19.9 (MD - 66.4, 95% IC: - 71.9; - 60.9); absence of perineural invasion (RR 0.93, 95% IC: 0.90; 0.96), lymph-vascular invasion (RR 0.87, 95% IC: 0.83; 0.91), venous invasion (RR 0.63, 95% IC: 0.48; 0.83) and perioperative transfusions (RR 0.56, 95% IC: 0.40; 0.79). Several factors are associated with an LTS. They can be considered reliable indicators for predicting tumor progression.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.