Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad
{"title":"早期药物流产后随访:随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mate Whenua-follow-up after early medical abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mate Whenua-follow-up after early medical abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.
Methods: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.
Discussion: If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.
Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.
期刊介绍:
Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.