早期药物流产后随访:随机对照试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0
Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad
{"title":"早期药物流产后随访:随机对照试验的研究方案。","authors":"Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mate Whenua-follow-up after early medical abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle R Wise, E Jane MacDonald, Alison Knowles, Sally Talbot, Stephanie Shankar, Brittany Gibbons, Bev Lawton, Varsha Parag, Ashleigh O'Mara Baker, Sophia Amjad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09016-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期药物流产(EMA)安全有效;一个不常见但关键的不良后果是持续的活产妊娠。EMA后的最佳随访方法是一个关键的研究空白。很少有试验将血液或尿液妊娠检查与超声波扫描进行比较,也没有试验将这些检查相互比较。目的是评价EMA后两种随访方法的随访完整性——低敏感性尿妊娠试验自评和系列血清βhCG血检。次要目的是评估自我评估随访是否安全,患者和临床医生是否可以接受。方法:这是一项在新西兰进行的多中心随机对照试验。符合条件的妇女和患有EMA的孕妇将随机进行自我评估或血液检查随访。主要结果是“随访失败”。为了检测“失访”率从基线的15%下降到7.5%,在90%的功率和0.05的双侧1型误差下,所需的样本量为736名参与者,比例为1:1。讨论:如果自我评估减少随访损失,具有额外的临床益处,并且安全,具有成本效益,并且为女性和临床医生所接受,我们预计全球EMA随访实践将发生变化。我们认为自我评估将作为EMA后以患者为中心的一揽子护理的一部分受到欢迎。试验注册:该试验于2023年8月21日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)前瞻性注册,注册号为ACTRN12623000890639;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mate Whenua-follow-up after early medical abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Mate Whenua-follow-up after early medical abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial adverse outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow-up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scans, and no trial compares these tests to each other. The aim is to evaluate the completeness of follow-up of two methods of follow-up after EMA- self-assessment with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test result or serial serum βhCG blood tests. Secondary aims will evaluate whether self-assessment follow-up is safe and acceptable to patients and clinicians.

Methods: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial in New Zealand. Eligible women and pregnant people having EMA will be randomised to self-assessment or blood test follow-up. The primary outcome is 'lost to follow-up.' To detect a decrease in 'lost to follow-up' rate from baseline of 15% to 7.5%, with 90% power and a two-sided type 1 error of 0.05, the sample size required is 736 participants, in a 1:1 ratio.

Discussion: If self-assessment reduces lost to follow-up, has additional clinical benefits, and is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to women and clinicians, we anticipate change in EMA follow-up practice around the world. We think self-assessment will be welcomed as part of a patient-centred package of care following EMA.

Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 21 August 2023, registration number ACTRN12623000890639; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=384373.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信