{"title":"微创结直肠癌手术微创剖腹探查与经直肠自然口标本提取:随机对照试验研究方案(MINITR-NOSE试验,TCAR2514方案)","authors":"Ai-Lun Lo, Yu-Jen Hsu, Yih-Jong Chern, Ching-Chung Cheng, Bor-Kang Jong, Zhen-Hao Yu, Li-Yang Chan, Jeng-Fu You","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09039-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has improved colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment by reducing recovery time, pain, and infection risk compared to traditional open surgery, though a mini laparotomy is still needed for specimen removal. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) offers a promising alternative by using natural body openings for extraction, potentially minimizing complications further, yet requires more evidence to confirm its safety and effectiveness over conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled trial at Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital includes CRC patients meeting specific eligibility criteria, randomly assigned to undergo either NOSE or conventional MIS. Primary outcomes focus on postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a marker of inflammation, with secondary outcomes evaluating short-term complications, recovery, readmission, and long-term survival. Both groups will receive routine perioperative care following modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, with postoperative pain and complications systematically recorded and graded.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study seeks to determine whether the NOSE approach offers advantages over conventional MIS by reducing inflammation and complications, potentially improving patient recovery and outcomes. If effective, NOSE may present a less invasive alternative for CRC resection, contributing to advancements in colorectal surgical oncology.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05740267. Registered on March 1, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mini-laparotomy versus transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MINITR-NOSE trial, TCAR2514 protocol).\",\"authors\":\"Ai-Lun Lo, Yu-Jen Hsu, Yih-Jong Chern, Ching-Chung Cheng, Bor-Kang Jong, Zhen-Hao Yu, Li-Yang Chan, Jeng-Fu You\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09039-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has improved colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment by reducing recovery time, pain, and infection risk compared to traditional open surgery, though a mini laparotomy is still needed for specimen removal. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) offers a promising alternative by using natural body openings for extraction, potentially minimizing complications further, yet requires more evidence to confirm its safety and effectiveness over conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled trial at Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital includes CRC patients meeting specific eligibility criteria, randomly assigned to undergo either NOSE or conventional MIS. Primary outcomes focus on postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a marker of inflammation, with secondary outcomes evaluating short-term complications, recovery, readmission, and long-term survival. Both groups will receive routine perioperative care following modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, with postoperative pain and complications systematically recorded and graded.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study seeks to determine whether the NOSE approach offers advantages over conventional MIS by reducing inflammation and complications, potentially improving patient recovery and outcomes. If effective, NOSE may present a less invasive alternative for CRC resection, contributing to advancements in colorectal surgical oncology.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05740267. Registered on March 1, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09039-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09039-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与传统的开放手术相比,微创手术(MIS)通过减少恢复时间、疼痛和感染风险,改善了结直肠癌(CRC)的治疗,尽管仍然需要进行小型剖腹手术来切除标本。自然孔口标本提取(NOSE)是一种很有前途的替代方法,它使用自然的身体开口进行提取,可能会进一步减少并发症,但需要更多的证据来证实其安全性和有效性优于传统方法。方法:在林口市长工纪念医院进行的单中心随机对照试验纳入符合特定资格标准的结直肠癌患者,随机分配接受鼻内镜或常规MIS。主要结局关注术后c反应蛋白(CRP)水平作为炎症标志物,次要结局评估短期并发症、恢复、再入院和长期生存。两组均按照改良后的ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)方案接受常规围手术期护理,对术后疼痛和并发症进行系统记录和分级。讨论:本研究旨在确定NOSE方法是否通过减少炎症和并发症,潜在地改善患者的康复和预后,而优于传统MIS。如果鼻鼻手术有效,鼻鼻手术可能为结直肠癌切除术提供一种侵入性较小的替代方法,有助于结直肠外科肿瘤学的进步。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05740267。于2023年3月1日注册。
Mini-laparotomy versus transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MINITR-NOSE trial, TCAR2514 protocol).
Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has improved colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment by reducing recovery time, pain, and infection risk compared to traditional open surgery, though a mini laparotomy is still needed for specimen removal. Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) offers a promising alternative by using natural body openings for extraction, potentially minimizing complications further, yet requires more evidence to confirm its safety and effectiveness over conventional methods.
Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial at Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital includes CRC patients meeting specific eligibility criteria, randomly assigned to undergo either NOSE or conventional MIS. Primary outcomes focus on postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as a marker of inflammation, with secondary outcomes evaluating short-term complications, recovery, readmission, and long-term survival. Both groups will receive routine perioperative care following modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, with postoperative pain and complications systematically recorded and graded.
Discussion: This study seeks to determine whether the NOSE approach offers advantages over conventional MIS by reducing inflammation and complications, potentially improving patient recovery and outcomes. If effective, NOSE may present a less invasive alternative for CRC resection, contributing to advancements in colorectal surgical oncology.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05740267. Registered on March 1, 2023.
期刊介绍:
Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.