在现代毒理学中导航复杂性:组学在短期体内研究中的作用。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Constance A Mitchell, Leah Wehmas, David Rouquie, Florian Caiment, Richard A Currie, Christine E Crute
{"title":"在现代毒理学中导航复杂性:组学在短期体内研究中的作用。","authors":"Constance A Mitchell, Leah Wehmas, David Rouquie, Florian Caiment, Richard A Currie, Christine E Crute","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicology is shifting toward predictive, mechanism-based approaches that support quicker, more human-relevant risk assessments and reduce reliance on animal testing. Central to this shift are short-term in vivo studies enriched with omics endpoints which provide early molecular indicators of toxicity. These data enable the derivation of molecular points of departures (mPODs) and other biologically anchored metrics that can inform potency ranking, hazard identification, and risk assessment. This commentary summarizes insights from the 2025 Society of Toxicology (SOT) session of the same name and highlights the importance of aligning technical advances with regulatory needs. Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) is a safety evaluation approach that incorporates emerging tools such as in vitro methods, computational models, and omics data to inform decision-making for human health or the environment, while aiming to reduce dependence on traditional animal testing. NGRA frameworks, while potentially generic in principle, must be tailored to the specific regulatory requirements and exposure contexts of different product sectors, including pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, agrochemicals, and cosmetics. Short-term mechanistic animal studies serve as a bridge between traditional long-term animal testing and new approach methodologies (NAMs). From a technical standpoint, the generation, analysis, and interpretation of omics data have matured considerably, bringing regulatory acceptance within reach. Remaining challenges include standardizing bioinformatics pipelines, building confidence through validation against apical endpoints, and expanding training. Addressing these gaps through collaborative science and flexible regulatory frameworks will be key to realizing the full potential of omics-enabled hazard profiles to support NGRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Complexity in Modern Toxicology: The Role of Omics in Short-Term In Vivo Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Constance A Mitchell, Leah Wehmas, David Rouquie, Florian Caiment, Richard A Currie, Christine E Crute\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Toxicology is shifting toward predictive, mechanism-based approaches that support quicker, more human-relevant risk assessments and reduce reliance on animal testing. Central to this shift are short-term in vivo studies enriched with omics endpoints which provide early molecular indicators of toxicity. These data enable the derivation of molecular points of departures (mPODs) and other biologically anchored metrics that can inform potency ranking, hazard identification, and risk assessment. This commentary summarizes insights from the 2025 Society of Toxicology (SOT) session of the same name and highlights the importance of aligning technical advances with regulatory needs. Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) is a safety evaluation approach that incorporates emerging tools such as in vitro methods, computational models, and omics data to inform decision-making for human health or the environment, while aiming to reduce dependence on traditional animal testing. NGRA frameworks, while potentially generic in principle, must be tailored to the specific regulatory requirements and exposure contexts of different product sectors, including pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, agrochemicals, and cosmetics. Short-term mechanistic animal studies serve as a bridge between traditional long-term animal testing and new approach methodologies (NAMs). From a technical standpoint, the generation, analysis, and interpretation of omics data have matured considerably, bringing regulatory acceptance within reach. Remaining challenges include standardizing bioinformatics pipelines, building confidence through validation against apical endpoints, and expanding training. Addressing these gaps through collaborative science and flexible regulatory frameworks will be key to realizing the full potential of omics-enabled hazard profiles to support NGRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毒理学正在转向预测性、基于机制的方法,以支持更快、更与人类相关的风险评估,并减少对动物试验的依赖。这种转变的核心是短期体内研究,这些研究丰富了组学终点,提供了毒性的早期分子指标。这些数据可以推导出分子离点(mPODs)和其他生物锚定指标,从而为效力排序、危害识别和风险评估提供信息。本评论总结了2025年毒理学学会(SOT)同名会议的见解,并强调了将技术进步与监管需求相结合的重要性。下一代风险评估(NGRA)是一种安全评估方法,它结合了诸如体外方法、计算模型和组学数据等新兴工具,为人类健康或环境的决策提供信息,同时旨在减少对传统动物试验的依赖。NGRA框架虽然在原则上可能是通用的,但必须针对不同产品部门(包括药品、工业化学品、农用化学品和化妆品)的具体监管要求和暴露环境进行调整。短期机械动物实验是传统的长期动物实验和新方法方法之间的桥梁。从技术角度来看,组学数据的生成、分析和解释已经相当成熟,使监管机构可以接受。剩下的挑战包括标准化生物信息学管道,通过对顶点的验证建立信心,以及扩大培训。通过协作科学和灵活的监管框架来解决这些差距,将是实现基因组学支持NGRA的危害概况的全部潜力的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Complexity in Modern Toxicology: The Role of Omics in Short-Term In Vivo Studies.

Toxicology is shifting toward predictive, mechanism-based approaches that support quicker, more human-relevant risk assessments and reduce reliance on animal testing. Central to this shift are short-term in vivo studies enriched with omics endpoints which provide early molecular indicators of toxicity. These data enable the derivation of molecular points of departures (mPODs) and other biologically anchored metrics that can inform potency ranking, hazard identification, and risk assessment. This commentary summarizes insights from the 2025 Society of Toxicology (SOT) session of the same name and highlights the importance of aligning technical advances with regulatory needs. Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) is a safety evaluation approach that incorporates emerging tools such as in vitro methods, computational models, and omics data to inform decision-making for human health or the environment, while aiming to reduce dependence on traditional animal testing. NGRA frameworks, while potentially generic in principle, must be tailored to the specific regulatory requirements and exposure contexts of different product sectors, including pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, agrochemicals, and cosmetics. Short-term mechanistic animal studies serve as a bridge between traditional long-term animal testing and new approach methodologies (NAMs). From a technical standpoint, the generation, analysis, and interpretation of omics data have matured considerably, bringing regulatory acceptance within reach. Remaining challenges include standardizing bioinformatics pipelines, building confidence through validation against apical endpoints, and expanding training. Addressing these gaps through collaborative science and flexible regulatory frameworks will be key to realizing the full potential of omics-enabled hazard profiles to support NGRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信