{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者房颤和其他心律失常的系统和机会性筛查：一项前瞻性、单中心、横断面研究","authors":"Tachawut Tiensuntisook, Voravut Rungpradubvong, Naruepat Sangpornsuk, Mananchaya Thapanasuta, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul, Somchai Prechawat, Nattapong Jaimchariyatam","doi":"10.1177/20406223251348336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at high risk for atrial fibrillation (AF), but data on the benefits of early AF screening in this population, including the prevalence of AF detected through such screening, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the prevalence of AF in OSA patients using three screening methods and aims to identify the most effective approach, as well as the potential benefits of early AF detection in this population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed AF prevalence using three screening methods: opportunistic screening via pulse taking during a routine visit, systematic screening with a handheld electrocardiogram (EKG), and EKG during polysomnography. The analysis also included the proportion of patients with positive screenings who were indicated for anticoagulation and the prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 OSA patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46 years and a mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 1. The prevalence of AF was 1.5%, 2.5%, and 2.0% when detected by pulse taking, handheld EKG, and EKG during polysomnography, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.933). All patients with positive screenings were indicated for oral anticoagulant therapy. The prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias was higher than in the general population, and detecting arrhythmias during sleep appeared to be more effective than detecting them while awake, particularly for atrial tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of AF in OSA patients ranged from 1.5% to 2.5%, with the highest rate observed in handheld EKG systematic screening, though the difference was not statistically significant. Non-AF arrhythmias were also more common than in the general population, highlighting the need for broader arrhythmia surveillance. Further large-scale studies in higher-risk OSA populations are needed to confirm the benefits of systematic AF screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":22960,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406223251348336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic and opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Tachawut Tiensuntisook, Voravut Rungpradubvong, Naruepat Sangpornsuk, Mananchaya Thapanasuta, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul, Somchai Prechawat, Nattapong Jaimchariyatam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406223251348336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at high risk for atrial fibrillation (AF), but data on the benefits of early AF screening in this population, including the prevalence of AF detected through such screening, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the prevalence of AF in OSA patients using three screening methods and aims to identify the most effective approach, as well as the potential benefits of early AF detection in this population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed AF prevalence using three screening methods: opportunistic screening via pulse taking during a routine visit, systematic screening with a handheld electrocardiogram (EKG), and EKG during polysomnography. The analysis also included the proportion of patients with positive screenings who were indicated for anticoagulation and the prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 OSA patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46 years and a mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 1. The prevalence of AF was 1.5%, 2.5%, and 2.0% when detected by pulse taking, handheld EKG, and EKG during polysomnography, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.933). All patients with positive screenings were indicated for oral anticoagulant therapy. The prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias was higher than in the general population, and detecting arrhythmias during sleep appeared to be more effective than detecting them while awake, particularly for atrial tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of AF in OSA patients ranged from 1.5% to 2.5%, with the highest rate observed in handheld EKG systematic screening, though the difference was not statistically significant. Non-AF arrhythmias were also more common than in the general population, highlighting the need for broader arrhythmia surveillance. Further large-scale studies in higher-risk OSA populations are needed to confirm the benefits of systematic AF screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20406223251348336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223251348336\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223251348336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic and opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.
Background: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be at high risk for atrial fibrillation (AF), but data on the benefits of early AF screening in this population, including the prevalence of AF detected through such screening, remain limited.
Objectives: This study evaluates the prevalence of AF in OSA patients using three screening methods and aims to identify the most effective approach, as well as the potential benefits of early AF detection in this population.
Methods: This study assessed AF prevalence using three screening methods: opportunistic screening via pulse taking during a routine visit, systematic screening with a handheld electrocardiogram (EKG), and EKG during polysomnography. The analysis also included the proportion of patients with positive screenings who were indicated for anticoagulation and the prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias.
Results: A total of 201 OSA patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46 years and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1. The prevalence of AF was 1.5%, 2.5%, and 2.0% when detected by pulse taking, handheld EKG, and EKG during polysomnography, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.933). All patients with positive screenings were indicated for oral anticoagulant therapy. The prevalence of other non-AF arrhythmias was higher than in the general population, and detecting arrhythmias during sleep appeared to be more effective than detecting them while awake, particularly for atrial tachycardia.
Conclusion: The prevalence of AF in OSA patients ranged from 1.5% to 2.5%, with the highest rate observed in handheld EKG systematic screening, though the difference was not statistically significant. Non-AF arrhythmias were also more common than in the general population, highlighting the need for broader arrhythmia surveillance. Further large-scale studies in higher-risk OSA populations are needed to confirm the benefits of systematic AF screening.
期刊介绍：
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease publishes the highest quality peer-reviewed research, reviews and scholarly comment in the drug treatment of all chronic diseases. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers involved in the medical treatment of chronic disease, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
