有过敏体质史的人群对COVID-19疫苗过敏风险的评价

Q3 Medicine
Dhruve Soni, Sunita C Shukla, Nithya J Gogtay, Sukant Pandit, Milind Y Nadkar
{"title":"有过敏体质史的人群对COVID-19疫苗过敏风险的评价","authors":"Dhruve Soni, Sunita C Shukla, Nithya J Gogtay, Sukant Pandit, Milind Y Nadkar","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and rationale: </strong>Vaccination has formed the mainstay for mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine-induced allergic reactions, though rare, have made it difficult to ensure complete coverage of COVID-19 vaccination. Initial guideline issued by the Government of India contraindicated vaccination in those with food or drug allergies. Allergic reactions largely result from excipients such as polysorbate 80 (P-80) (present in COVISHIELD™) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [present in the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines]. The present study was carried out with the objective of allergy testing in those with a history of allergic diathesis to generate objective evidence to the extent of true allergies to COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, written informed consent was obtained for this prospective, open-label study in 100 participants. Allergic response assessment in participants with a history of any allergies, yet unvaccinated to COVID-19, or have taken the first dose and were due for second dose, or had taken the second dose and were due for the precautionary dose, was done by skin prick test (SPT) followed by intradermal testing (IDT) injection with COVISHIELD™ vaccine, P-80, and PEG individually. Based on the result of the skin test (either positive or negative), participants were given advice regarding vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 enrolled participants, <i>n</i> = 75 had taken both doses of any COVID-19 vaccine, <i>n</i> = 15 had taken only the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine, and <i>n</i> = 10 were yet unvaccinated. There was no [0/92 (0%) and 0/98 (0%)] positive test with PEG and P-80, respectively. Only 02/98 (2.04%) returned a positive test with full strength (1:1) COVISHIELD™ vaccine IDT but not with SPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates a low risk of allergy to PEG, P-80, and COVISHIELD™. Where feasible, allergy testing and counseling can be offered to unvaccinated or partially vaccinated individuals with a history of allergic diathesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 7","pages":"44-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation for the Risk of Allergy to COVID-19 Vaccines in People with History of Allergy Diathesis.\",\"authors\":\"Dhruve Soni, Sunita C Shukla, Nithya J Gogtay, Sukant Pandit, Milind Y Nadkar\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.73.1041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and rationale: </strong>Vaccination has formed the mainstay for mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine-induced allergic reactions, though rare, have made it difficult to ensure complete coverage of COVID-19 vaccination. Initial guideline issued by the Government of India contraindicated vaccination in those with food or drug allergies. Allergic reactions largely result from excipients such as polysorbate 80 (P-80) (present in COVISHIELD™) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [present in the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines]. The present study was carried out with the objective of allergy testing in those with a history of allergic diathesis to generate objective evidence to the extent of true allergies to COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, written informed consent was obtained for this prospective, open-label study in 100 participants. Allergic response assessment in participants with a history of any allergies, yet unvaccinated to COVID-19, or have taken the first dose and were due for second dose, or had taken the second dose and were due for the precautionary dose, was done by skin prick test (SPT) followed by intradermal testing (IDT) injection with COVISHIELD™ vaccine, P-80, and PEG individually. Based on the result of the skin test (either positive or negative), participants were given advice regarding vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 enrolled participants, <i>n</i> = 75 had taken both doses of any COVID-19 vaccine, <i>n</i> = 15 had taken only the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine, and <i>n</i> = 10 were yet unvaccinated. There was no [0/92 (0%) and 0/98 (0%)] positive test with PEG and P-80, respectively. Only 02/98 (2.04%) returned a positive test with full strength (1:1) COVISHIELD™ vaccine IDT but not with SPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates a low risk of allergy to PEG, P-80, and COVISHIELD™. Where feasible, allergy testing and counseling can be offered to unvaccinated or partially vaccinated individuals with a history of allergic diathesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"44-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和理由:疫苗接种已成为缓解COVID-19大流行的主要手段。疫苗引起的过敏反应虽然罕见,但仍难以确保COVID-19疫苗的完全覆盖。印度政府发布的初步指南禁止对食物或药物过敏的人接种疫苗。过敏反应主要由辅料引起,如聚山梨酸80 (P-80)(存在于COVISHIELD™中)和聚乙二醇(PEG)[存在于信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗中]。本研究的目的是对有过敏素质史的人群进行过敏测试,以获得对COVID-19疫苗真正过敏程度的客观证据。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会批准后,获得了100名参与者的前瞻性开放标签研究的书面知情同意书。对有任何过敏史、未接种COVID-19疫苗、已接种第一剂并应接种第二剂、或已接种第二剂并应接种预防剂的受试者进行过敏反应评估,通过皮肤点刺试验(SPT),然后分别注射COVISHIELD™疫苗、P-80和PEG进行皮内试验(IDT)。根据皮肤试验的结果(阳性或阴性),向参与者提供有关接种疫苗的建议。结果:在100名纳入的参与者中,n = 75人接种了任何一剂COVID-19疫苗,n = 15人只接种了任何一剂COVID-19疫苗,n = 10人尚未接种疫苗。PEG和P-80分别无[0/92(0%)和0/98(0%)]阳性。只有02/98(2.04%)的COVISHIELD™全强度(1:1)疫苗IDT阳性,而SPT阴性。结论:本研究表明PEG、P-80和COVISHIELD™的过敏风险较低。在可行的情况下,可以向有过敏素质史的未接种疫苗或部分接种疫苗的个体提供过敏测试和咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation for the Risk of Allergy to COVID-19 Vaccines in People with History of Allergy Diathesis.

Background and rationale: Vaccination has formed the mainstay for mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine-induced allergic reactions, though rare, have made it difficult to ensure complete coverage of COVID-19 vaccination. Initial guideline issued by the Government of India contraindicated vaccination in those with food or drug allergies. Allergic reactions largely result from excipients such as polysorbate 80 (P-80) (present in COVISHIELD™) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [present in the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines]. The present study was carried out with the objective of allergy testing in those with a history of allergic diathesis to generate objective evidence to the extent of true allergies to COVID-19 vaccination.

Materials and methods: After approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, written informed consent was obtained for this prospective, open-label study in 100 participants. Allergic response assessment in participants with a history of any allergies, yet unvaccinated to COVID-19, or have taken the first dose and were due for second dose, or had taken the second dose and were due for the precautionary dose, was done by skin prick test (SPT) followed by intradermal testing (IDT) injection with COVISHIELD™ vaccine, P-80, and PEG individually. Based on the result of the skin test (either positive or negative), participants were given advice regarding vaccination.

Results: Of the 100 enrolled participants, n = 75 had taken both doses of any COVID-19 vaccine, n = 15 had taken only the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine, and n = 10 were yet unvaccinated. There was no [0/92 (0%) and 0/98 (0%)] positive test with PEG and P-80, respectively. Only 02/98 (2.04%) returned a positive test with full strength (1:1) COVISHIELD™ vaccine IDT but not with SPT.

Conclusion: This study indicates a low risk of allergy to PEG, P-80, and COVISHIELD™. Where feasible, allergy testing and counseling can be offered to unvaccinated or partially vaccinated individuals with a history of allergic diathesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信