对罕见骨病中活动障碍的影响和测量进行系统的文献综述。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2025-08-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X251369963
Inês Alves, Ingunn Westerheim, Edward C Hsiao, Jaymin Upadhyay, Luca Sangiorgi, Alexander Artyomenko, Kim Croskery, Juliet Johns, Emma Warnants, Gabor Barton
{"title":"对罕见骨病中活动障碍的影响和测量进行系统的文献综述。","authors":"Inês Alves, Ingunn Westerheim, Edward C Hsiao, Jaymin Upadhyay, Luca Sangiorgi, Alexander Artyomenko, Kim Croskery, Juliet Johns, Emma Warnants, Gabor Barton","doi":"10.1177/1759720X251369963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although rare bone diseases (RBDs) present mobility challenges, there is little consolidated evidence on evaluated mobility measurement tools or how mobility impairments impact daily activities and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Objectives and design: </strong>This systematic literature review investigated: (1) the impacts of mobility impairment on daily activities/QoL; (2) the suitability/comprehensiveness of tools measuring mobility.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>MEDLINE/Embase databases (January 19, 2022) and Google (October 19, 2022) were searched for articles published between 2011 and 2022; conference proceedings from 2020 to 2021 were hand-searched. Included articles reported on how mobility impairments impact daily activities/QoL, or the use of tools for measuring mobility, in RBDs. A narrative analysis using descriptive statistics was conducted. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using The Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Quality Assessment Criteria and National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 113 articles, investigating 39 RBDs (sample sizes: <i>N</i> = 1-959). Mobility impairments, commonly joint function/gait disturbances, negatively impacted daily activities (<i>n</i> = 47 cohorts; frequently walking (27/47; 57.4%)) and QoL (<i>n</i> = 36 cohorts; commonly pain (30/36; 83.3%; Objective 1). There were 34 functional assessments, 22 questionnaires, and 5 technologies described. Only nine functional assessments/questionnaires were reported to have good validity/reliability/responsiveness for an RBD (not reported for technologies); none comprehensively captured daily living/QoL impacts of mobility impairment. The quality of studies was moderate, though many were case studies/series, which are at inherent risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few tools comprehensively captured mobility impairments and associated impacts on daily activities/QoL. Consistent reporting of tools' validity/reliability/responsiveness would support clinicians in selecting methods for use across RBD populations. Used remotely, wearables could support understanding of real-world mobility challenges. Since searches were conducted, additional technologies (e.g., remote gait analysis) have been tested in RBDs, although validation is required.</p><p><strong>Protocol prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022311513. Sponsored by Ipsen.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"1759720X251369963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review of the impact and measurement of mobility impairment in rare bone diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Inês Alves, Ingunn Westerheim, Edward C Hsiao, Jaymin Upadhyay, Luca Sangiorgi, Alexander Artyomenko, Kim Croskery, Juliet Johns, Emma Warnants, Gabor Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1759720X251369963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although rare bone diseases (RBDs) present mobility challenges, there is little consolidated evidence on evaluated mobility measurement tools or how mobility impairments impact daily activities and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Objectives and design: </strong>This systematic literature review investigated: (1) the impacts of mobility impairment on daily activities/QoL; (2) the suitability/comprehensiveness of tools measuring mobility.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>MEDLINE/Embase databases (January 19, 2022) and Google (October 19, 2022) were searched for articles published between 2011 and 2022; conference proceedings from 2020 to 2021 were hand-searched. Included articles reported on how mobility impairments impact daily activities/QoL, or the use of tools for measuring mobility, in RBDs. A narrative analysis using descriptive statistics was conducted. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using The Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Quality Assessment Criteria and National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inclusion criteria were met by 113 articles, investigating 39 RBDs (sample sizes: <i>N</i> = 1-959). Mobility impairments, commonly joint function/gait disturbances, negatively impacted daily activities (<i>n</i> = 47 cohorts; frequently walking (27/47; 57.4%)) and QoL (<i>n</i> = 36 cohorts; commonly pain (30/36; 83.3%; Objective 1). There were 34 functional assessments, 22 questionnaires, and 5 technologies described. Only nine functional assessments/questionnaires were reported to have good validity/reliability/responsiveness for an RBD (not reported for technologies); none comprehensively captured daily living/QoL impacts of mobility impairment. The quality of studies was moderate, though many were case studies/series, which are at inherent risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Few tools comprehensively captured mobility impairments and associated impacts on daily activities/QoL. Consistent reporting of tools' validity/reliability/responsiveness would support clinicians in selecting methods for use across RBD populations. Used remotely, wearables could support understanding of real-world mobility challenges. Since searches were conducted, additional technologies (e.g., remote gait analysis) have been tested in RBDs, although validation is required.</p><p><strong>Protocol prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022311513. Sponsored by Ipsen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1759720X251369963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X251369963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X251369963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管罕见骨病(rbd)存在活动能力方面的挑战,但很少有关于评估活动能力测量工具或活动能力障碍如何影响日常活动和生活质量(QoL)的综合证据。目的与设计:本系统文献综述研究:(1)行动障碍对日常活动/生活质量的影响;(2)流动性测量工具的适宜性/全面性。数据来源和方法:检索2011 - 2022年间发表的文章,检索MEDLINE/Embase数据库(2022年1月19日)和谷歌数据库(2022年10月19日);手工检索2020年至2021年的会议记录。收录了关于活动障碍如何影响rbd患者的日常活动/生活质量,或使用测量活动能力的工具的文章。采用描述性统计进行叙事分析。使用阿尔伯塔传统基金会医学研究质量评估标准和国家卫生研究所案例系列研究质量评估工具评估研究的偏倚风险。结果:113篇文章符合纳入标准,调查了39个rbd(样本量:N = 1-959)。活动障碍,常见的关节功能/步态障碍,对日常活动(n = 47队列;频繁行走(27/47;57.4%))和生活质量(n = 36队列;常见疼痛(30/36;83.3%;目的1)产生负面影响。共有34项功能评估、22份问卷和5项技术被描述。据报道,只有9个功能评估/问卷对RBD具有良好的效度/可靠性/响应性(未报告技术);没有一项全面反映了行动障碍对日常生活/生活质量的影响。研究的质量是中等的,尽管许多是案例研究/系列研究,存在固有的偏倚风险。结论:很少有工具能全面捕捉到行动障碍及其对日常活动/生活质量的相关影响。一致报告工具的有效性/可靠性/响应性将支持临床医生选择在RBD人群中使用的方法。远程使用时,可穿戴设备可以帮助理解现实世界的移动挑战。由于进行了搜索,已经在rbd中测试了其他技术(例如远程步态分析),尽管需要验证。协议普洛斯佩罗注册:CRD42022311513。由Ipsen赞助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic literature review of the impact and measurement of mobility impairment in rare bone diseases.

Background: Although rare bone diseases (RBDs) present mobility challenges, there is little consolidated evidence on evaluated mobility measurement tools or how mobility impairments impact daily activities and quality of life (QoL).

Objectives and design: This systematic literature review investigated: (1) the impacts of mobility impairment on daily activities/QoL; (2) the suitability/comprehensiveness of tools measuring mobility.

Data sources and methods: MEDLINE/Embase databases (January 19, 2022) and Google (October 19, 2022) were searched for articles published between 2011 and 2022; conference proceedings from 2020 to 2021 were hand-searched. Included articles reported on how mobility impairments impact daily activities/QoL, or the use of tools for measuring mobility, in RBDs. A narrative analysis using descriptive statistics was conducted. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using The Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Quality Assessment Criteria and National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 113 articles, investigating 39 RBDs (sample sizes: N = 1-959). Mobility impairments, commonly joint function/gait disturbances, negatively impacted daily activities (n = 47 cohorts; frequently walking (27/47; 57.4%)) and QoL (n = 36 cohorts; commonly pain (30/36; 83.3%; Objective 1). There were 34 functional assessments, 22 questionnaires, and 5 technologies described. Only nine functional assessments/questionnaires were reported to have good validity/reliability/responsiveness for an RBD (not reported for technologies); none comprehensively captured daily living/QoL impacts of mobility impairment. The quality of studies was moderate, though many were case studies/series, which are at inherent risk of bias.

Conclusion: Few tools comprehensively captured mobility impairments and associated impacts on daily activities/QoL. Consistent reporting of tools' validity/reliability/responsiveness would support clinicians in selecting methods for use across RBD populations. Used remotely, wearables could support understanding of real-world mobility challenges. Since searches were conducted, additional technologies (e.g., remote gait analysis) have been tested in RBDs, although validation is required.

Protocol prospero registration: CRD42022311513. Sponsored by Ipsen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信