依达拉奉治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的疗效和安全性:它是安全的,但不能阻止进展。

Q3 Medicine
Salil Gupta, Sunny Tomar, Rahul Soni, Ravi Anadure, Manoj Somashekhar, Anuj Singhal
{"title":"依达拉奉治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的疗效和安全性:它是安全的,但不能阻止进展。","authors":"Salil Gupta, Sunny Tomar, Rahul Soni, Ravi Anadure, Manoj Somashekhar, Anuj Singhal","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Edaravone is recommended for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on a study showing an effect on a defined subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To document the effect of edaravone in a cohort of ALS patients from India to find out if, after starting edaravone, there is a plateau period or significant slowing from baseline to compare results with existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective observational study with no control arm (due to ethical reasons). ALS patients >18 years of age, not requiring respiratory support or tube feeding, were included. All patients were given edaravone infusion in addition to standard of care and oral riluzole 50 mg twice daily. This consisted of giving the drug in monthly cycles over 6 months. The first cycle consisted of daily infusion of the drug for 14 days followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. From cycle 2 to cycle 6, the patients received the drug for the first 10 days of the month followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. The primary outcome was a significant change in Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were monthly change in ALSFRS-R scores when compared with the previous month and baseline, change in the first 3 months compared to the change in the next 3 months, adverse drug effects, and number of deaths. The study was registered with the Indian Council of Medical Research Clinical Trial Registry of India with the trial number CTRI/2019/11/021838. Paired <i>t</i>-test was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients received the drug along with riluzole. Twenty-three patients completed all six monthly infusions. Two died (3 months), two developed adverse reactions (3 months) and did not want further infusions (one had breathing difficulty and the other had hypotension during infusion). Two withdrew consent due to perceived poor effectiveness of the drug. The mean ALSFRS-R at baseline was 35.17 [standard deviation (SD) 8.01; range 20-46]. The primary outcome showed a significant decline in the mean last available ALSFRS-R score 6 months by -4.9 (SD 1.21) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). For the secondary outcome measure, mean monthly ALSFRS-R score was calculated before each infusion after excluding dropouts. There was a significant monthly decline in ALSFRS-R score: -0.93 (SD 0.58), -1.0 (-0.52), -0.90 (SD 0.71), -0.87 (SD 0.61), -0.82 (SD 0.57), -0.95 (SD 0.63), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was also a progressive monthly decline when compared to baseline. The rate of decline in the first 3 months was the same as in the remaining 3 months: -2.5 (SD 0.73) vs -2.6 (SD 0.98) (<i>p</i> = 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Edaravone infusion does not stop or significantly slow progression of disease from baseline but is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 7","pages":"68-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Edaravone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: It is Safe but Does Not Stop Progression.\",\"authors\":\"Salil Gupta, Sunny Tomar, Rahul Soni, Ravi Anadure, Manoj Somashekhar, Anuj Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.73.1044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Edaravone is recommended for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on a study showing an effect on a defined subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To document the effect of edaravone in a cohort of ALS patients from India to find out if, after starting edaravone, there is a plateau period or significant slowing from baseline to compare results with existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective observational study with no control arm (due to ethical reasons). ALS patients >18 years of age, not requiring respiratory support or tube feeding, were included. All patients were given edaravone infusion in addition to standard of care and oral riluzole 50 mg twice daily. This consisted of giving the drug in monthly cycles over 6 months. The first cycle consisted of daily infusion of the drug for 14 days followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. From cycle 2 to cycle 6, the patients received the drug for the first 10 days of the month followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. The primary outcome was a significant change in Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were monthly change in ALSFRS-R scores when compared with the previous month and baseline, change in the first 3 months compared to the change in the next 3 months, adverse drug effects, and number of deaths. The study was registered with the Indian Council of Medical Research Clinical Trial Registry of India with the trial number CTRI/2019/11/021838. Paired <i>t</i>-test was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients received the drug along with riluzole. Twenty-three patients completed all six monthly infusions. Two died (3 months), two developed adverse reactions (3 months) and did not want further infusions (one had breathing difficulty and the other had hypotension during infusion). Two withdrew consent due to perceived poor effectiveness of the drug. The mean ALSFRS-R at baseline was 35.17 [standard deviation (SD) 8.01; range 20-46]. The primary outcome showed a significant decline in the mean last available ALSFRS-R score 6 months by -4.9 (SD 1.21) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). For the secondary outcome measure, mean monthly ALSFRS-R score was calculated before each infusion after excluding dropouts. There was a significant monthly decline in ALSFRS-R score: -0.93 (SD 0.58), -1.0 (-0.52), -0.90 (SD 0.71), -0.87 (SD 0.61), -0.82 (SD 0.57), -0.95 (SD 0.63), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was also a progressive monthly decline when compared to baseline. The rate of decline in the first 3 months was the same as in the remaining 3 months: -2.5 (SD 0.73) vs -2.6 (SD 0.98) (<i>p</i> = 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Edaravone infusion does not stop or significantly slow progression of disease from baseline but is safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"68-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据一项研究显示,依达拉奉对特定患者的影响,推荐用于肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)。目的:记录依达拉奉在印度ALS患者队列中的作用,以了解在开始使用依达拉奉后,是否存在平台期或从基线开始显着减慢,以便与现有文献进行比较。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性观察性研究,没有对照组(由于伦理原因)。纳入年龄为18岁、不需要呼吸支持或管饲的ALS患者。所有患者在标准护理和口服利鲁唑50 mg每日两次的基础上给予依达拉奉输注。这包括在6个月内按月给药。第一个周期包括每天输注药物14天,然后在该月的剩余时间内不给药。从第2周期到第6周期,患者在该月的前10天接受药物治疗,然后在该月的剩余时间内不用药。主要结局是6个月时修订肌萎缩性侧索硬化症功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)评分较基线有显著变化。次要结局是ALSFRS-R评分与前一个月和基线比较的月度变化,前3个月与后3个月比较的变化,药物不良反应和死亡人数。该研究已在印度医学研究委员会临床试验登记处注册,试验编号为CTRI/2019/11/021838。采用配对t检验进行统计分析。结果:30例患者与利鲁唑合用。23名患者完成了所有6个月的输注。2例死亡(3个月),2例出现不良反应(3个月),不需要进一步输注(1例出现呼吸困难,1例在输注期间出现低血压)。其中两人因认为药物效果不佳而撤回了同意。基线时平均ALSFRS-R为35.17[标准差(SD) 8.01;范围20-46]。主要结局显示,6个月后ALSFRS-R平均评分显著下降-4.9 (SD 1.21) (p < 0.01)。对于次要结局指标,在排除退出患者后,在每次输注前计算平均每月ALSFRS-R评分。ALSFRS-R评分逐月显著下降,分别为-0.93 (SD 0.58)、-1.0 (SD 0.52)、-0.90 (SD 0.71)、-0.87 (SD 0.61)、-0.82 (SD 0.57)、-0.95 (SD 0.63) (p < 0.001)。与基线相比,每月也有渐进下降。前3个月的下降率与其余3个月相同:-2.5 (SD 0.73) vs -2.6 (SD 0.98) (p = 0.3)。结论:依达拉奉输注不能阻止或显著减缓疾病的进展,但是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Edaravone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: It is Safe but Does Not Stop Progression.

Background: Edaravone is recommended for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on a study showing an effect on a defined subset of patients.

Aim: To document the effect of edaravone in a cohort of ALS patients from India to find out if, after starting edaravone, there is a plateau period or significant slowing from baseline to compare results with existing literature.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective observational study with no control arm (due to ethical reasons). ALS patients >18 years of age, not requiring respiratory support or tube feeding, were included. All patients were given edaravone infusion in addition to standard of care and oral riluzole 50 mg twice daily. This consisted of giving the drug in monthly cycles over 6 months. The first cycle consisted of daily infusion of the drug for 14 days followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. From cycle 2 to cycle 6, the patients received the drug for the first 10 days of the month followed by a drug-free interval for the remaining part of the month. The primary outcome was a significant change in Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were monthly change in ALSFRS-R scores when compared with the previous month and baseline, change in the first 3 months compared to the change in the next 3 months, adverse drug effects, and number of deaths. The study was registered with the Indian Council of Medical Research Clinical Trial Registry of India with the trial number CTRI/2019/11/021838. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Thirty patients received the drug along with riluzole. Twenty-three patients completed all six monthly infusions. Two died (3 months), two developed adverse reactions (3 months) and did not want further infusions (one had breathing difficulty and the other had hypotension during infusion). Two withdrew consent due to perceived poor effectiveness of the drug. The mean ALSFRS-R at baseline was 35.17 [standard deviation (SD) 8.01; range 20-46]. The primary outcome showed a significant decline in the mean last available ALSFRS-R score 6 months by -4.9 (SD 1.21) (p < 0.01). For the secondary outcome measure, mean monthly ALSFRS-R score was calculated before each infusion after excluding dropouts. There was a significant monthly decline in ALSFRS-R score: -0.93 (SD 0.58), -1.0 (-0.52), -0.90 (SD 0.71), -0.87 (SD 0.61), -0.82 (SD 0.57), -0.95 (SD 0.63), respectively (p < 0.001). There was also a progressive monthly decline when compared to baseline. The rate of decline in the first 3 months was the same as in the remaining 3 months: -2.5 (SD 0.73) vs -2.6 (SD 0.98) (p = 0.3).

Conclusion: Edaravone infusion does not stop or significantly slow progression of disease from baseline but is safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信