基于神经网络和集成学习的系统发育树参数估计。

IF 5.7 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Tianjian Qin, Koen J van Benthem, Luis Valente, Rampal S Etienne
{"title":"基于神经网络和集成学习的系统发育树参数估计。","authors":"Tianjian Qin, Koen J van Benthem, Luis Valente, Rampal S Etienne","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Species diversification is characterized by speciation and extinction, the rates of which can, under some assumptions, be estimated from time-calibrated phylogenies. However, maximum likelihood estimation methods (MLE) for inferring rates are limited to simpler models and can show bias, particularly in small phylogenies. Likelihood-free methods to estimate parameters of diversification models using deep learning have started to emerge, but how robust neural network methods are at handling the intricate nature of phylogenetic data remains an open question. Here we present a new ensemble neural network approach to estimate diversification parameters from phylogenetic trees that leverages different classes of neural networks (dense neural network, graph neural network, and long short-term memory recurrent network) and simultaneously learns from graph representations of phylogenies, their branching times and their summary statistics. Our best-performing ensemble neural network (which adjusts the graph neural network result using a recurrent neural network) delivers estimates faster than MLE and shows less sensitivity to tree size for constant-rate and diversity-dependent speciation scenarios. It performs well compared to an existing convolutional network approach. However, like MLE, our approach still fails to recover parameters precisely under a protracted birth-death process. Our analysis suggests that the primary limitation to accurate parameter estimation is the amount of information contained within a phylogeny, as indicated by its size and the strength of effects shaping it. In cases where MLE is unavailable, our neural network method provides a promising alternative for estimating phylogenetic tree parameters. If detectable phylogenetic signals are present, our approach delivers results that are comparable to MLE but without inherent biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parameter Estimation from Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks and Ensemble Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Tianjian Qin, Koen J van Benthem, Luis Valente, Rampal S Etienne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sysbio/syaf060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Species diversification is characterized by speciation and extinction, the rates of which can, under some assumptions, be estimated from time-calibrated phylogenies. However, maximum likelihood estimation methods (MLE) for inferring rates are limited to simpler models and can show bias, particularly in small phylogenies. Likelihood-free methods to estimate parameters of diversification models using deep learning have started to emerge, but how robust neural network methods are at handling the intricate nature of phylogenetic data remains an open question. Here we present a new ensemble neural network approach to estimate diversification parameters from phylogenetic trees that leverages different classes of neural networks (dense neural network, graph neural network, and long short-term memory recurrent network) and simultaneously learns from graph representations of phylogenies, their branching times and their summary statistics. Our best-performing ensemble neural network (which adjusts the graph neural network result using a recurrent neural network) delivers estimates faster than MLE and shows less sensitivity to tree size for constant-rate and diversity-dependent speciation scenarios. It performs well compared to an existing convolutional network approach. However, like MLE, our approach still fails to recover parameters precisely under a protracted birth-death process. Our analysis suggests that the primary limitation to accurate parameter estimation is the amount of information contained within a phylogeny, as indicated by its size and the strength of effects shaping it. In cases where MLE is unavailable, our neural network method provides a promising alternative for estimating phylogenetic tree parameters. If detectable phylogenetic signals are present, our approach delivers results that are comparable to MLE but without inherent biases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种多样化的特征是物种形成和灭绝,在某些假设下,物种形成和灭绝的速率可以根据时间校准的系统发生来估计。然而,用于推断速率的最大似然估计方法(MLE)仅限于更简单的模型,并且可能存在偏差,特别是在小型系统发育中。使用深度学习来估计多样化模型参数的无似然方法已经开始出现,但是神经网络方法在处理系统发育数据的复杂性方面有多强大仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在这里,我们提出了一种新的集成神经网络方法来估计系统发生树的多样化参数,该方法利用不同类别的神经网络(密集神经网络、图神经网络和长短期记忆循环网络),同时从系统发生的图表示、分支时间和汇总统计中学习。我们表现最好的集成神经网络(使用循环神经网络调整图神经网络结果)比MLE提供更快的估计,并且在恒定速率和多样性依赖的物种形成场景中对树大小的敏感性较低。与现有的卷积网络方法相比,它表现良好。然而,与MLE一样,我们的方法仍然无法在长期的出生-死亡过程中精确地恢复参数。我们的分析表明,准确参数估计的主要限制是系统发育中包含的信息量,如其大小和形成它的效应的强度所表明的那样。在MLE不可用的情况下,我们的神经网络方法为估计系统发育树参数提供了一个有希望的替代方法。如果存在可检测的系统发育信号,我们的方法提供的结果与MLE相当,但没有固有的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parameter Estimation from Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks and Ensemble Learning.

Species diversification is characterized by speciation and extinction, the rates of which can, under some assumptions, be estimated from time-calibrated phylogenies. However, maximum likelihood estimation methods (MLE) for inferring rates are limited to simpler models and can show bias, particularly in small phylogenies. Likelihood-free methods to estimate parameters of diversification models using deep learning have started to emerge, but how robust neural network methods are at handling the intricate nature of phylogenetic data remains an open question. Here we present a new ensemble neural network approach to estimate diversification parameters from phylogenetic trees that leverages different classes of neural networks (dense neural network, graph neural network, and long short-term memory recurrent network) and simultaneously learns from graph representations of phylogenies, their branching times and their summary statistics. Our best-performing ensemble neural network (which adjusts the graph neural network result using a recurrent neural network) delivers estimates faster than MLE and shows less sensitivity to tree size for constant-rate and diversity-dependent speciation scenarios. It performs well compared to an existing convolutional network approach. However, like MLE, our approach still fails to recover parameters precisely under a protracted birth-death process. Our analysis suggests that the primary limitation to accurate parameter estimation is the amount of information contained within a phylogeny, as indicated by its size and the strength of effects shaping it. In cases where MLE is unavailable, our neural network method provides a promising alternative for estimating phylogenetic tree parameters. If detectable phylogenetic signals are present, our approach delivers results that are comparable to MLE but without inherent biases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信