{"title":"三级保健中心新诊断高血压患者的白大褂高血压及其预测因子","authors":"Muzafar Naik, Junaid Altaf, Tariq Bhat, Azra Tariq, Khalid Mushtaq","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) is best achieved by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as it helps differentiate sustained hypertension (SH) from white coat hypertension (WCH).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To diagnose SH and WCH in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>All newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) ≥140/90 mm Hg, attending the medical outpatient department and not on any antihypertensive treatment, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of ABPM in newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects by comparing OBPM with ABPM readings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 196 newly diagnosed HTN patients over a period of 18 months. All hypertensive patients were subjected to ABPM. Patients with persistent HTN on ABPM were labeled as SH, whereas those with normal blood pressure on ABPM were labeled as WCH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SH was diagnosed in 143 out of 196 (73%) patients. WCH was detected in 53 patients (27%). Patients with SH had a significant family history of HTN compared to patients with WCH (82.5 vs 45.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.00), higher office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to WCH (96.56 ± 4.63 vs 94.13 ± 3.23, <i>p</i> = 0.000), and significant nondipping pattern compared to WCH (37.1 vs 18.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABPM should be performed in all newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially if they have no family history of HTN and DBP is <95 mm Hg, to rule out WCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 7","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White Coat Hypertension and Its Predictors in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Center.\",\"authors\":\"Muzafar Naik, Junaid Altaf, Tariq Bhat, Azra Tariq, Khalid Mushtaq\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.73.1037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) is best achieved by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as it helps differentiate sustained hypertension (SH) from white coat hypertension (WCH).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To diagnose SH and WCH in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>All newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) ≥140/90 mm Hg, attending the medical outpatient department and not on any antihypertensive treatment, were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of ABPM in newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects by comparing OBPM with ABPM readings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 196 newly diagnosed HTN patients over a period of 18 months. All hypertensive patients were subjected to ABPM. Patients with persistent HTN on ABPM were labeled as SH, whereas those with normal blood pressure on ABPM were labeled as WCH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SH was diagnosed in 143 out of 196 (73%) patients. WCH was detected in 53 patients (27%). Patients with SH had a significant family history of HTN compared to patients with WCH (82.5 vs 45.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.00), higher office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to WCH (96.56 ± 4.63 vs 94.13 ± 3.23, <i>p</i> = 0.000), and significant nondipping pattern compared to WCH (37.1 vs 18.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ABPM should be performed in all newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially if they have no family history of HTN and DBP is <95 mm Hg, to rule out WCH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"25-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:高血压(HTN)的诊断最好通过动态血压监测(ABPM)来实现,因为它有助于区分持续性高血压(SH)和白大衣高血压(WCH)。目的:探讨新诊断高血压患者SH和WCH的诊断。材料:所有新诊断的办公室血压测量值(OBPM)≥140/90 mm Hg,在医学门诊就诊且未接受任何降压治疗的高血压患者纳入研究。目的:通过比较OBPM与ABPM读数,评价ABPM在新诊断高血压患者中的临床应用价值。方法:本描述性横断面研究对196例新诊断的HTN患者进行了为期18个月的研究。所有高血压患者均行ABPM。在ABPM上持续HTN的患者被标记为SH,而在ABPM上血压正常的患者被标记为WCH。结果:196例患者中有143例(73%)被诊断为SH。53例(27%)患者检出WCH。与WCH患者相比,SH患者有明显的HTN家族史(82.5% vs 45.3%, p = 0.00),与WCH患者相比,舒张压(DBP)较高(96.56±4.63 vs 94.13±3.23,p = 0.000),与WCH患者相比,SH患者有明显的非下沉模式(37.1 vs 18.9%, p = 0.015)。结论:所有新诊断的高血压患者都应进行ABPM检查,特别是无hdn家族史和舒张压存在的患者
White Coat Hypertension and Its Predictors in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Center.
Background: The diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) is best achieved by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) as it helps differentiate sustained hypertension (SH) from white coat hypertension (WCH).
Aim: To diagnose SH and WCH in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.
Materials: All newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) ≥140/90 mm Hg, attending the medical outpatient department and not on any antihypertensive treatment, were included in the study.
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of ABPM in newly diagnosed hypertensive subjects by comparing OBPM with ABPM readings.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 196 newly diagnosed HTN patients over a period of 18 months. All hypertensive patients were subjected to ABPM. Patients with persistent HTN on ABPM were labeled as SH, whereas those with normal blood pressure on ABPM were labeled as WCH.
Results: SH was diagnosed in 143 out of 196 (73%) patients. WCH was detected in 53 patients (27%). Patients with SH had a significant family history of HTN compared to patients with WCH (82.5 vs 45.3%, p = 0.00), higher office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) compared to WCH (96.56 ± 4.63 vs 94.13 ± 3.23, p = 0.000), and significant nondipping pattern compared to WCH (37.1 vs 18.9%, p = 0.015).
Conclusion: ABPM should be performed in all newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially if they have no family history of HTN and DBP is <95 mm Hg, to rule out WCH.