Julian Fine, Russel Kahmke, Tammara Watts, Daniel Rocke, Liana Puscas, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Walter T Lee
{"title":"ENLYT®便携式柔性鼻咽镜与标准护理鼻咽镜的比较","authors":"Julian Fine, Russel Kahmke, Tammara Watts, Daniel Rocke, Liana Puscas, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Walter T Lee","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study seeks to compare a newly developed portable flexible nasopharyngoscope (ENLYT<sup>®</sup>) to the standard of care (SOC) flexible nasopharyngoscope.MethodsSubjects were consented to undergo a nasopharyngeal scope exam using ENLYT<sup>®</sup> after SOC nasopharyngoscope examination. Data collection included a physician feedback survey consisting of questions regarding ease of use, video quality and perceived patient pain. Additionally, subjects provided a comparison of discomfort between the two scopes.ResultsThe following results were compiled from nine examiners completing ENLYT<sup>®</sup> exams on 50 patients. The nine examiners consisted of five attendings, three residents, and 1 physician assistant. The attendings performed 31 exams (62%) and the others performed 19 exams (38%). 72% of the exam surveys reported the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or easier to use than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. 88% of exams reported the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> video quality was \"the same\" to \"better\". 94% of exams reported the perceived patient pain with the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or less than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. Subjects reported that 88% of the exams were the same or less discomfort with the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> scope compared to the SOC scope.ConclusionThe portable ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was able to provide comparable exam results when compared to the SOC nasopharyngoscope.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251374480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ENLYT<sup>®</sup>, a Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope, with the Standard of Care Nasopharyngoscope.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Fine, Russel Kahmke, Tammara Watts, Daniel Rocke, Liana Puscas, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Walter T Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251374480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study seeks to compare a newly developed portable flexible nasopharyngoscope (ENLYT<sup>®</sup>) to the standard of care (SOC) flexible nasopharyngoscope.MethodsSubjects were consented to undergo a nasopharyngeal scope exam using ENLYT<sup>®</sup> after SOC nasopharyngoscope examination. Data collection included a physician feedback survey consisting of questions regarding ease of use, video quality and perceived patient pain. Additionally, subjects provided a comparison of discomfort between the two scopes.ResultsThe following results were compiled from nine examiners completing ENLYT<sup>®</sup> exams on 50 patients. The nine examiners consisted of five attendings, three residents, and 1 physician assistant. The attendings performed 31 exams (62%) and the others performed 19 exams (38%). 72% of the exam surveys reported the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or easier to use than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. 88% of exams reported the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> video quality was \\\"the same\\\" to \\\"better\\\". 94% of exams reported the perceived patient pain with the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or less than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. Subjects reported that 88% of the exams were the same or less discomfort with the ENLYT<sup>®</sup> scope compared to the SOC scope.ConclusionThe portable ENLYT<sup>®</sup> flexible nasopharyngoscope was able to provide comparable exam results when compared to the SOC nasopharyngoscope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251374480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of ENLYT®, a Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope, with the Standard of Care Nasopharyngoscope.
ObjectivesThis study seeks to compare a newly developed portable flexible nasopharyngoscope (ENLYT®) to the standard of care (SOC) flexible nasopharyngoscope.MethodsSubjects were consented to undergo a nasopharyngeal scope exam using ENLYT® after SOC nasopharyngoscope examination. Data collection included a physician feedback survey consisting of questions regarding ease of use, video quality and perceived patient pain. Additionally, subjects provided a comparison of discomfort between the two scopes.ResultsThe following results were compiled from nine examiners completing ENLYT® exams on 50 patients. The nine examiners consisted of five attendings, three residents, and 1 physician assistant. The attendings performed 31 exams (62%) and the others performed 19 exams (38%). 72% of the exam surveys reported the ENLYT® flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or easier to use than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. 88% of exams reported the ENLYT® video quality was "the same" to "better". 94% of exams reported the perceived patient pain with the ENLYT® flexible nasopharyngoscope was the same or less than the SOC nasopharyngoscope. Subjects reported that 88% of the exams were the same or less discomfort with the ENLYT® scope compared to the SOC scope.ConclusionThe portable ENLYT® flexible nasopharyngoscope was able to provide comparable exam results when compared to the SOC nasopharyngoscope.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).