中正中核刺激对LGS患者头皮间期脑电负荷的影响。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Adithya Sivaraju, James Poe, Hal Blumenfeld, Arthur Cukiert
{"title":"中正中核刺激对LGS患者头皮间期脑电负荷的影响。","authors":"Adithya Sivaraju, James Poe, Hal Blumenfeld, Arthur Cukiert","doi":"10.1159/000548242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian (CM) thalamic nucleus is a potential therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a severe and drug-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. While long-term seizure outcomes with CM-DBS have been described, its acute electrophysiological effects and predictive value remain uncertain. We examined whether short-term changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) following CM-DBS relate to seizure outcomes at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with LGS underwent CM-DBS implantation. About 1 month post-surgery, each patient had a 1-h scalp EEG. After a 10-min baseline, stimulation began at 1 V for 5 min, increasing in 1 V increments to 5 V or until paresthesias occurred. IEDs were detected automatically (Persyst v14c) and verified by an expert reviewer. Patients were followed for 1 year, with clinical response defined as ≥50% seizure reduction, i.e., responder. Correlations between acute IED change and seizure outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of 10 patients showed reduced IED burden during acute stimulation (31%-100%). At 1 year, 8 were responders and 2 nonresponders. Overall, acute IED reduction did not correlate with seizure outcome (Spearman's ρ = 0.3, p = 0.35). A ≥50% reduction in IED burden was seen in 7 of 7 responders versus 1 of 3 nonresponders, suggesting a nonsignificant trend toward predictive value (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute CM-DBS reduced IED burden in most patients with LGS but did not significantly predict long-term seizure outcomes. A trend toward greater IED reduction in responders suggests possible biomarker potential, though findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Limitations include small sample size, high responder rate, and short EEG duration. Larger studies with extended monitoring are needed to clarify the clinical utility of acute EEG changes as predictors of CM-DBS efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Centromedian Nucleus Stimulation on Interictal Scalp EEG Burden in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Adithya Sivaraju, James Poe, Hal Blumenfeld, Arthur Cukiert\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian (CM) thalamic nucleus is a potential therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a severe and drug-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. While long-term seizure outcomes with CM-DBS have been described, its acute electrophysiological effects and predictive value remain uncertain. We examined whether short-term changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) following CM-DBS relate to seizure outcomes at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with LGS underwent CM-DBS implantation. About 1 month post-surgery, each patient had a 1-h scalp EEG. After a 10-min baseline, stimulation began at 1 V for 5 min, increasing in 1 V increments to 5 V or until paresthesias occurred. IEDs were detected automatically (Persyst v14c) and verified by an expert reviewer. Patients were followed for 1 year, with clinical response defined as ≥50% seizure reduction, i.e., responder. Correlations between acute IED change and seizure outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of 10 patients showed reduced IED burden during acute stimulation (31%-100%). At 1 year, 8 were responders and 2 nonresponders. Overall, acute IED reduction did not correlate with seizure outcome (Spearman's ρ = 0.3, p = 0.35). A ≥50% reduction in IED burden was seen in 7 of 7 responders versus 1 of 3 nonresponders, suggesting a nonsignificant trend toward predictive value (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute CM-DBS reduced IED burden in most patients with LGS but did not significantly predict long-term seizure outcomes. A trend toward greater IED reduction in responders suggests possible biomarker potential, though findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Limitations include small sample size, high responder rate, and short EEG duration. Larger studies with extended monitoring are needed to clarify the clinical utility of acute EEG changes as predictors of CM-DBS efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深部脑刺激(DBS)针对丘脑中位核(CM)是lenox - gastaut综合征患者的一种新兴治疗选择。10例LGS伴CM-DBS患者术后约1个月进行1小时头皮脑电图。10分钟基线脑电图后,开始以1V刺激5分钟,以1V增量增加至5V或直到感觉异常发生。间隔放电(IED)由自动检测(Persyst v14c)识别,然后由专家阅读器筛选。除一名患者外,所有患者的IED负担均有所减轻(31%至100%)。8例患者有反应(癫痫发作频率至少减少50%),2例无反应。总体而言,IED负担的改善与一年内癫痫发作减少率无关(p=0.35, spearman秩相关系数为0.3)。IED负担减少50% (7/7 vs 1/3, p=0.06)似乎表明了识别应答者的趋势,但并不显著。这项研究有几个局限性。小样本量和高应答率限制了通用性,脑电图记录的持续时间短可能无法完全捕捉到间隔期活动随时间的波动。因此,我们的发现应该被视为初步的和假设生成。需要更大规模的脑电图采样研究来验证急性脑电图变化作为LGS预测生物标志物的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Centromedian Nucleus Stimulation on Interictal Scalp EEG Burden in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian (CM) thalamic nucleus is a potential therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a severe and drug-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. While long-term seizure outcomes with CM-DBS have been described, its acute electrophysiological effects and predictive value remain uncertain. We examined whether short-term changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) following CM-DBS relate to seizure outcomes at 1 year.

Methods: Ten patients with LGS underwent CM-DBS implantation. About 1 month post-surgery, each patient had a 1-h scalp EEG. After a 10-min baseline, stimulation began at 1 V for 5 min, increasing in 1 V increments to 5 V or until paresthesias occurred. IEDs were detected automatically (Persyst v14c) and verified by an expert reviewer. Patients were followed for 1 year, with clinical response defined as ≥50% seizure reduction, i.e., responder. Correlations between acute IED change and seizure outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation.

Results: Nine of 10 patients showed reduced IED burden during acute stimulation (31%-100%). At 1 year, 8 were responders and 2 nonresponders. Overall, acute IED reduction did not correlate with seizure outcome (Spearman's ρ = 0.3, p = 0.35). A ≥50% reduction in IED burden was seen in 7 of 7 responders versus 1 of 3 nonresponders, suggesting a nonsignificant trend toward predictive value (p = 0.06).

Conclusion: Acute CM-DBS reduced IED burden in most patients with LGS but did not significantly predict long-term seizure outcomes. A trend toward greater IED reduction in responders suggests possible biomarker potential, though findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Limitations include small sample size, high responder rate, and short EEG duration. Larger studies with extended monitoring are needed to clarify the clinical utility of acute EEG changes as predictors of CM-DBS efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信