Ligasure Impact™减少腹部成形术后并发症:比较研究的荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Salvatore Giordano, Veera Korhonen, Andre' Salval, Pietro G di Summa, Carlo Maria Oranges
{"title":"Ligasure Impact™减少腹部成形术后并发症:比较研究的荟萃分析。","authors":"Salvatore Giordano, Veera Korhonen, Andre' Salval, Pietro G di Summa, Carlo Maria Oranges","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe optimal dissection technique for flap elevation in abdominoplasty remains debated, particularly in high-risk patients after massive weight loss. The LigaSure Impact™ (LS) vessel-sealing system (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an advanced energy device used across surgical disciplines to reduce morbidity. This meta-analysis compares LS with conventional techniques to assess its effectiveness in abdominoplasty.MethodA systematic literature search identified relevant studies comparing LS with standard methods. Primary outcome was the overall postoperative complications' rate; secondary outcomes included specific wound complications, operative time, and hospital stay.StatisticsA random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for categorical outcomes; mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 3 studies totaling 205 patients. LS significantly reduced overall complication rates compared to controls (RD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hematoma and wound dehiscence incidences were significantly lower (<i>P</i> = 0.03 and <i>P</i> = 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were observed for seroma, infection, or fat/flap necrosis. LS use was also associated with reduced re-operation rates and shorter hospital stays, though operative time was comparable.DiscussionLS may improve surgical outcomes in post-weight-loss abdominoplasty patients by reducing complications and hospitalization. However, the limited number of studies and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation.ConclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that LS may offer potential benefits in abdominoplasty; however, current findings should be interpreted with caution because of limited quality and heterogeneity of available studies. Further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251374484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ligasure Impact™ to Reduce Complications After Abdominoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Giordano, Veera Korhonen, Andre' Salval, Pietro G di Summa, Carlo Maria Oranges\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251374484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe optimal dissection technique for flap elevation in abdominoplasty remains debated, particularly in high-risk patients after massive weight loss. The LigaSure Impact™ (LS) vessel-sealing system (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an advanced energy device used across surgical disciplines to reduce morbidity. This meta-analysis compares LS with conventional techniques to assess its effectiveness in abdominoplasty.MethodA systematic literature search identified relevant studies comparing LS with standard methods. Primary outcome was the overall postoperative complications' rate; secondary outcomes included specific wound complications, operative time, and hospital stay.StatisticsA random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for categorical outcomes; mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 3 studies totaling 205 patients. LS significantly reduced overall complication rates compared to controls (RD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hematoma and wound dehiscence incidences were significantly lower (<i>P</i> = 0.03 and <i>P</i> = 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were observed for seroma, infection, or fat/flap necrosis. LS use was also associated with reduced re-operation rates and shorter hospital stays, though operative time was comparable.DiscussionLS may improve surgical outcomes in post-weight-loss abdominoplasty patients by reducing complications and hospitalization. However, the limited number of studies and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation.ConclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that LS may offer potential benefits in abdominoplasty; however, current findings should be interpreted with caution because of limited quality and heterogeneity of available studies. Further research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251374484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374484\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腹成形术中皮瓣提升的最佳解剖技术仍存在争议,特别是在体重大幅减轻的高危患者中。LigaSure Impact™(LS)血管密封系统(美敦力,都柏林,爱尔兰)是一种先进的能量设备,用于外科学科,以降低发病率。本荟萃分析比较LS与传统技术,以评估其在腹部成形术中的有效性。方法系统检索相关文献,将LS与标准方法进行比较。主要观察指标为术后总并发症发生率;次要结局包括特定伤口并发症、手术时间和住院时间。统计学采用随机效应模型进行合并分析。计算分类结果的风险差异(RD)和95%置信区间(CI);连续结果的平均差异(MD)。采用I2统计量评估异质性。结果共纳入3项研究,共计205例患者。与对照组相比,LS显著降低了总并发症发生率(RD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.60 ~ -0.32, P < 0.001)。血肿、创面裂开发生率显著低于对照组(P = 0.03、P = 0.01)。血清肿、感染或脂肪/皮瓣坏死无显著差异。LS的使用也与减少再手术率和缩短住院时间有关,尽管手术时间是可比的。ls可以通过减少并发症和住院治疗来改善减重后腹部成形术患者的手术效果。然而,研究数量有限,样本量小,需要谨慎解释。结论初步证据表明,LS可能在腹部成形术中具有潜在的益处;然而,由于现有研究的质量有限和异质性,目前的研究结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ligasure Impact™ to Reduce Complications After Abdominoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

BackgroundThe optimal dissection technique for flap elevation in abdominoplasty remains debated, particularly in high-risk patients after massive weight loss. The LigaSure Impact™ (LS) vessel-sealing system (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an advanced energy device used across surgical disciplines to reduce morbidity. This meta-analysis compares LS with conventional techniques to assess its effectiveness in abdominoplasty.MethodA systematic literature search identified relevant studies comparing LS with standard methods. Primary outcome was the overall postoperative complications' rate; secondary outcomes included specific wound complications, operative time, and hospital stay.StatisticsA random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for categorical outcomes; mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 3 studies totaling 205 patients. LS significantly reduced overall complication rates compared to controls (RD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.32, P < 0.001). Hematoma and wound dehiscence incidences were significantly lower (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were observed for seroma, infection, or fat/flap necrosis. LS use was also associated with reduced re-operation rates and shorter hospital stays, though operative time was comparable.DiscussionLS may improve surgical outcomes in post-weight-loss abdominoplasty patients by reducing complications and hospitalization. However, the limited number of studies and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation.ConclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that LS may offer potential benefits in abdominoplasty; however, current findings should be interpreted with caution because of limited quality and heterogeneity of available studies. Further research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信