磁控生长棒(MCGRs)治疗早发性脊柱侧凸的内部机制失效:对植入物回收分析研究的系统回顾。

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Riaz Mohammed, Pranav Shah, Bnar Massraf, Sashin Ahuja
{"title":"磁控生长棒(MCGRs)治疗早发性脊柱侧凸的内部机制失效:对植入物回收分析研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Riaz Mohammed, Pranav Shah, Bnar Massraf, Sashin Ahuja","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01171-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are used to treat early-onset scoliosis when nonsurgical options fail, controlling curve progression and allowing for continued spinal growth. Recent reports of unplanned reoperations and mechanical failure of MCGRs have led to further research. This is a systematic review on the retrieval analysis of explanted MCGR rods. Understanding the failure mechanisms will shed light on the survivorship and complications associated with the implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline and EMBASE database search was performed, looking at all variations in the terms \"magnetic controlled growing rods\" and the terms \"retrieval/explant/metallosis\" All published retrieval analysis studies of MCGR were included, and all clinical outcome studies, biomechanical testing studies, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Data were collected regarding the source, year, and aim of the study; number of patients and rods analysed; duration of implantation; and main findings and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies (454 rods) reported metallosis due to O-ring damage (67%), internal mechanism failure of locking pins (45%) and rod fracture (7%) in all MCGR generations. Actuator locking pin fractures reported in 174 rods (38.3%) continue to persist despite newer implant iterations. The pin fracture rates decreased from 52% in MAGEC 1.3 to 15% in MAGEC X.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC. This systematic review provides Level III evidence on failure mechanisms in MCGR, as the results were obtained from Level III studies. The levels of evidence for all relevant references can be found in the reference section.</p><p><strong>Level ii: </strong>[1-4].</p><p><strong>Level iii: </strong>[5-34].</p><p><strong>Level iv: </strong>[35-44].</p><p><strong>Level v: </strong>[45-50].</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal mechanism failure of magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) for early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review of implant retrieval analysis studies.\",\"authors\":\"Riaz Mohammed, Pranav Shah, Bnar Massraf, Sashin Ahuja\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01171-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are used to treat early-onset scoliosis when nonsurgical options fail, controlling curve progression and allowing for continued spinal growth. Recent reports of unplanned reoperations and mechanical failure of MCGRs have led to further research. This is a systematic review on the retrieval analysis of explanted MCGR rods. Understanding the failure mechanisms will shed light on the survivorship and complications associated with the implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Medline and EMBASE database search was performed, looking at all variations in the terms \\\"magnetic controlled growing rods\\\" and the terms \\\"retrieval/explant/metallosis\\\" All published retrieval analysis studies of MCGR were included, and all clinical outcome studies, biomechanical testing studies, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Data were collected regarding the source, year, and aim of the study; number of patients and rods analysed; duration of implantation; and main findings and conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies (454 rods) reported metallosis due to O-ring damage (67%), internal mechanism failure of locking pins (45%) and rod fracture (7%) in all MCGR generations. Actuator locking pin fractures reported in 174 rods (38.3%) continue to persist despite newer implant iterations. The pin fracture rates decreased from 52% in MAGEC 1.3 to 15% in MAGEC X.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong>MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC. This systematic review provides Level III evidence on failure mechanisms in MCGR, as the results were obtained from Level III studies. The levels of evidence for all relevant references can be found in the reference section.</p><p><strong>Level ii: </strong>[1-4].</p><p><strong>Level iii: </strong>[5-34].</p><p><strong>Level iv: </strong>[35-44].</p><p><strong>Level v: </strong>[45-50].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01171-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01171-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:磁控生长棒(MCGRs)用于治疗非手术治疗失败的早发性脊柱侧凸,控制弯曲进展并允许脊柱继续生长。最近关于mcgr意外再操作和机械故障的报道导致了进一步的研究。本文是对MCGR棒外植体检索分析的系统综述。了解失败机制将有助于了解与植入物相关的生存和并发症。方法:在Medline和EMBASE数据库中进行检索,查看“磁控生长棒”和“检索/外植体/金属治疗”这两个术语的所有变化,包括所有已发表的MCGR检索分析研究,排除所有临床结果研究、生物力学测试研究、综述文章和病例报告。收集有关研究来源、年份和目的的数据;分析患者数和棒数;植入时间;主要发现和结论。结果:在所有MCGR世代中,9项研究(454根杆)报告了o型圈损伤(67%)、锁定销内部机构失效(45%)和杆断裂(7%)导致的金属中毒。据报道,174例(38.3%)的执行器锁定销骨折持续存在,尽管更新了植入物。MAGEC的骨折率从1.3组的52%下降到MAGEC x组的15%。结论:MCGR失败是多因素的,金属中毒是值得关注的,因为患者的长期影响未知。早期识别和修改现有的原位杆是至关重要的,同时在未来的MAGEC迭代中继续努力减少机械故障。证据水平:MCGR失败是多因素的,由于对患者的长期影响未知,金属中毒值得关注。早期识别和修改现有的原位杆是至关重要的,同时在未来的MAGEC迭代中继续努力减少机械故障。本系统综述提供了MCGR失败机制的III级证据,因为结果来自III级研究。所有相关参考文献的证据水平可以在参考文献部分找到。二级:[1-4]。等级iii:[5-34]。四级:[35-44]。v级:[45-50]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal mechanism failure of magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) for early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review of implant retrieval analysis studies.

Purpose: Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are used to treat early-onset scoliosis when nonsurgical options fail, controlling curve progression and allowing for continued spinal growth. Recent reports of unplanned reoperations and mechanical failure of MCGRs have led to further research. This is a systematic review on the retrieval analysis of explanted MCGR rods. Understanding the failure mechanisms will shed light on the survivorship and complications associated with the implant.

Methods: A Medline and EMBASE database search was performed, looking at all variations in the terms "magnetic controlled growing rods" and the terms "retrieval/explant/metallosis" All published retrieval analysis studies of MCGR were included, and all clinical outcome studies, biomechanical testing studies, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Data were collected regarding the source, year, and aim of the study; number of patients and rods analysed; duration of implantation; and main findings and conclusions.

Results: Nine studies (454 rods) reported metallosis due to O-ring damage (67%), internal mechanism failure of locking pins (45%) and rod fracture (7%) in all MCGR generations. Actuator locking pin fractures reported in 174 rods (38.3%) continue to persist despite newer implant iterations. The pin fracture rates decreased from 52% in MAGEC 1.3 to 15% in MAGEC X.

Conclusions: MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC.

Levels of evidence: MCGR failure is multifactorial, and metallosis is of significant concern because of the unknown long-term effects in patients. Early recognition and revision of existing rods in situ is essential, along with continued efforts to reduce mechanical failure in future iterations of MAGEC. This systematic review provides Level III evidence on failure mechanisms in MCGR, as the results were obtained from Level III studies. The levels of evidence for all relevant references can be found in the reference section.

Level ii: [1-4].

Level iii: [5-34].

Level iv: [35-44].

Level v: [45-50].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信