Renan Gonçalves Leonel da Silva, Amanda Curi, Larry Au, Cristian Capotescu, Gil Eyal
{"title":"全球卫生中的争议性疾病和替代专业知识网络:巴西的后covid综合征。","authors":"Renan Gonçalves Leonel da Silva, Amanda Curi, Larry Au, Cristian Capotescu, Gil Eyal","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contested illnesses such as long COVID or post-COVID syndrome create heightened uncertainty for patients as they navigate diagnosis and treatment. To lessen this uncertainty, patients in the United States and Europe have relied on patient activism and patient-led research to seek recognition from medical, scientific and political institutions. However, patients in other countries rely on different sets of strategies. Drawing on a survey (n = 144) and interviews (n = 32) of patients with post-COVID syndrome recruited via social media in Brazil, we found common experiences of psychologisation and dismissal of patient experiences. To combat this dismissal, some patients turned to each other online. However, patient groups showed a preference for advice from credentialled experts rather than asserting the embodied expertise of patients. Similarly, in the construction of alternative expertise networks, patients continued to rely on credentialled experts in the private healthcare system and from foreign and nonstate experts. We discuss how these alternative expertise networks may diminish the possibility of collective mobilisation and how those who are more socioeconomically disadvantaged and under-represented in our study will likely endure additional challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"47 7","pages":"e70079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contested Illness and Alternative Expertise Networks in Global Health: Post-COVID Syndrome in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Renan Gonçalves Leonel da Silva, Amanda Curi, Larry Au, Cristian Capotescu, Gil Eyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9566.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contested illnesses such as long COVID or post-COVID syndrome create heightened uncertainty for patients as they navigate diagnosis and treatment. To lessen this uncertainty, patients in the United States and Europe have relied on patient activism and patient-led research to seek recognition from medical, scientific and political institutions. However, patients in other countries rely on different sets of strategies. Drawing on a survey (n = 144) and interviews (n = 32) of patients with post-COVID syndrome recruited via social media in Brazil, we found common experiences of psychologisation and dismissal of patient experiences. To combat this dismissal, some patients turned to each other online. However, patient groups showed a preference for advice from credentialled experts rather than asserting the embodied expertise of patients. Similarly, in the construction of alternative expertise networks, patients continued to rely on credentialled experts in the private healthcare system and from foreign and nonstate experts. We discuss how these alternative expertise networks may diminish the possibility of collective mobilisation and how those who are more socioeconomically disadvantaged and under-represented in our study will likely endure additional challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of health & illness\",\"volume\":\"47 7\",\"pages\":\"e70079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of health & illness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contested Illness and Alternative Expertise Networks in Global Health: Post-COVID Syndrome in Brazil.
Contested illnesses such as long COVID or post-COVID syndrome create heightened uncertainty for patients as they navigate diagnosis and treatment. To lessen this uncertainty, patients in the United States and Europe have relied on patient activism and patient-led research to seek recognition from medical, scientific and political institutions. However, patients in other countries rely on different sets of strategies. Drawing on a survey (n = 144) and interviews (n = 32) of patients with post-COVID syndrome recruited via social media in Brazil, we found common experiences of psychologisation and dismissal of patient experiences. To combat this dismissal, some patients turned to each other online. However, patient groups showed a preference for advice from credentialled experts rather than asserting the embodied expertise of patients. Similarly, in the construction of alternative expertise networks, patients continued to rely on credentialled experts in the private healthcare system and from foreign and nonstate experts. We discuss how these alternative expertise networks may diminish the possibility of collective mobilisation and how those who are more socioeconomically disadvantaged and under-represented in our study will likely endure additional challenges.
期刊介绍:
Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.