在尸体张力性气胸模型中,开窗导管优于无开窗针状开胸导管。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Adam J Kruse, Jennifer Achay, Emily Epley, Jeffrey Swenson, Brian Ferguson, Jeffrey E Rollman, Erik DeSoucy, Shannon N Thompson, David Wampler
{"title":"在尸体张力性气胸模型中,开窗导管优于无开窗针状开胸导管。","authors":"Adam J Kruse, Jennifer Achay, Emily Epley, Jeffrey Swenson, Brian Ferguson, Jeffrey E Rollman, Erik DeSoucy, Shannon N Thompson, David Wampler","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2549726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tension pneumothorax (tPTX) is the third leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Needle thoracostomy (NT) is the standard prehospital treatment; however, the optimal catheter characteristics are unknown. This study compares the efficacy of NT using 3.25-inch 14ga and 3.25-inch 10ga, non-fenestrated and fenestrated catheters in a tPTX model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a non-randomized, non-blinded study using fresh, unembalmed, never frozen, human cadavers. Tension pneumothorax was induced by air insufflation to 15 mmHg through a 10ga pleural catheter. The tPTX was then released through the test devices (14ga non-fenestrated, 14ga fenestrated, 10ga non-fenestrated, 10ga fenestrated) placed at either the 5th intercostal space (ICS) anterior-axillary line or 2nd ICS mid-clavicular line. The change in intrathoracic pressure and the time to lowest pressure were recorded. The primary end point was the successful relief of tPTX which was defined as a decrease in pleural pressure to <4 mmHg. The needle thoracostomy catheter was capped, tPTX was reestablished, and the process was repeated for the remaining three locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol was performed on twelve cadavers with two NT procedures performed on each side of the chest. Non-fenestrated catheters were successful in 7/16 (44%) attempts while fenestrated catheters were successful in 27/32 (84%) attempts, <i>p</i> < 0.01. Median time to minimum pressure was 33.0 s (IQR 19.1, 46.3) seconds for non-fenestrated and 30.9 s (IQR 19.8, 37.8) seconds for fenestrated catheters, <i>p</i> = 0.96. The median time to minimum pressure was 36.0 s (IQR 26.1, 44.8) for 14ga catheters and 21.2 s (IQR 10.9, 35.5) for 10ga catheters, <i>p</i> = 0.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fenestrated NT catheters were superior to non-fenestrated catheters in the management of tPTX in this cadaver model. There is reasonable expectation of similar performance in real-world use. The selection of 14ga versus 10ga catheters is less important than inclusion of fenestrations for rapid relief of tension physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fenestrated Catheters are Superior to Non-Fenestrated Needle Thoracostomy Catheters in a Cadaveric Tension Pneumothorax Model.\",\"authors\":\"Adam J Kruse, Jennifer Achay, Emily Epley, Jeffrey Swenson, Brian Ferguson, Jeffrey E Rollman, Erik DeSoucy, Shannon N Thompson, David Wampler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2549726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tension pneumothorax (tPTX) is the third leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Needle thoracostomy (NT) is the standard prehospital treatment; however, the optimal catheter characteristics are unknown. This study compares the efficacy of NT using 3.25-inch 14ga and 3.25-inch 10ga, non-fenestrated and fenestrated catheters in a tPTX model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a non-randomized, non-blinded study using fresh, unembalmed, never frozen, human cadavers. Tension pneumothorax was induced by air insufflation to 15 mmHg through a 10ga pleural catheter. The tPTX was then released through the test devices (14ga non-fenestrated, 14ga fenestrated, 10ga non-fenestrated, 10ga fenestrated) placed at either the 5th intercostal space (ICS) anterior-axillary line or 2nd ICS mid-clavicular line. The change in intrathoracic pressure and the time to lowest pressure were recorded. The primary end point was the successful relief of tPTX which was defined as a decrease in pleural pressure to <4 mmHg. The needle thoracostomy catheter was capped, tPTX was reestablished, and the process was repeated for the remaining three locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protocol was performed on twelve cadavers with two NT procedures performed on each side of the chest. Non-fenestrated catheters were successful in 7/16 (44%) attempts while fenestrated catheters were successful in 27/32 (84%) attempts, <i>p</i> < 0.01. Median time to minimum pressure was 33.0 s (IQR 19.1, 46.3) seconds for non-fenestrated and 30.9 s (IQR 19.8, 37.8) seconds for fenestrated catheters, <i>p</i> = 0.96. The median time to minimum pressure was 36.0 s (IQR 26.1, 44.8) for 14ga catheters and 21.2 s (IQR 10.9, 35.5) for 10ga catheters, <i>p</i> = 0.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fenestrated NT catheters were superior to non-fenestrated catheters in the management of tPTX in this cadaver model. There is reasonable expectation of similar performance in real-world use. The selection of 14ga versus 10ga catheters is less important than inclusion of fenestrations for rapid relief of tension physiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2549726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2549726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:张力性气胸(tPTX)是战场上可预防死亡的第三大原因。针刺开胸术(NT)是标准的院前治疗;然而,最佳的导管特性是未知的。本研究比较了在tPTX模型中使用3.25英寸14ga和3.25英寸10ga、非开窗和开窗导管的NT的疗效。方法:这是一项非随机、非盲法研究,使用新鲜、未防腐、未冷冻的人类尸体。张力性气胸通过10ga胸膜导管注入空气至15mmhg。然后通过放置在第5肋间隙(ICS)腋窝前线或第2 ICS锁骨中线的测试装置(14ga无孔,14ga有孔,10ga无孔,10ga有孔)释放tPTX。记录胸内压变化及降至最低压所需时间。主要终点是tPTX的成功缓解,其定义为胸膜压力的降低。结果:该方案在12具尸体上进行,每侧胸部进行两次NT手术。非开窗置管成功率为7/16(44%),开窗置管成功率为27/32 (84%),p < 0.01。无开窗置管达到最小压力的中位时间为33.0秒(IQR为19.1,46.3)秒,开窗置管为30.9秒(IQR为19.8,37.8)秒,p = 0.96。14ga导管达到最小压力的中位时间为36.0秒(IQR 26.1, 44.8)秒,10ga导管为21.2秒(IQR 10.9, 35.5)秒,p = 0.01。结论:在该尸体模型中,开孔NT导管治疗tPTX优于非开孔NT导管。在实际使用中有类似性能的合理期望。为了快速缓解紧张生理,14ga和10ga导管的选择没有包括开窗那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fenestrated Catheters are Superior to Non-Fenestrated Needle Thoracostomy Catheters in a Cadaveric Tension Pneumothorax Model.

Objectives: Tension pneumothorax (tPTX) is the third leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Needle thoracostomy (NT) is the standard prehospital treatment; however, the optimal catheter characteristics are unknown. This study compares the efficacy of NT using 3.25-inch 14ga and 3.25-inch 10ga, non-fenestrated and fenestrated catheters in a tPTX model.

Methods: This was a non-randomized, non-blinded study using fresh, unembalmed, never frozen, human cadavers. Tension pneumothorax was induced by air insufflation to 15 mmHg through a 10ga pleural catheter. The tPTX was then released through the test devices (14ga non-fenestrated, 14ga fenestrated, 10ga non-fenestrated, 10ga fenestrated) placed at either the 5th intercostal space (ICS) anterior-axillary line or 2nd ICS mid-clavicular line. The change in intrathoracic pressure and the time to lowest pressure were recorded. The primary end point was the successful relief of tPTX which was defined as a decrease in pleural pressure to <4 mmHg. The needle thoracostomy catheter was capped, tPTX was reestablished, and the process was repeated for the remaining three locations.

Results: The protocol was performed on twelve cadavers with two NT procedures performed on each side of the chest. Non-fenestrated catheters were successful in 7/16 (44%) attempts while fenestrated catheters were successful in 27/32 (84%) attempts, p < 0.01. Median time to minimum pressure was 33.0 s (IQR 19.1, 46.3) seconds for non-fenestrated and 30.9 s (IQR 19.8, 37.8) seconds for fenestrated catheters, p = 0.96. The median time to minimum pressure was 36.0 s (IQR 26.1, 44.8) for 14ga catheters and 21.2 s (IQR 10.9, 35.5) for 10ga catheters, p = 0.01.

Conclusions: Fenestrated NT catheters were superior to non-fenestrated catheters in the management of tPTX in this cadaver model. There is reasonable expectation of similar performance in real-world use. The selection of 14ga versus 10ga catheters is less important than inclusion of fenestrations for rapid relief of tension physiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信