实时反馈设备对医护人员袋-阀-面罩通气性能的影响。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Julian Lasik, Tomasz Kłosiewicz, Mateusz Puślecki
{"title":"实时反馈设备对医护人员袋-阀-面罩通气性能的影响。","authors":"Julian Lasik, Tomasz Kłosiewicz, Mateusz Puślecki","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2552354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilation using a self-expanding bag and face mask poses important challenges, even for experienced healthcare professionals. Several devices have been developed and introduced to the market with the aim of improving the quality of bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a real-time ventilation feedback device (VFD) influences ventilation quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited one hundred paramedics to perform manual ventilation on a high-fidelity manikin using a BVM, first without and subsequently with the VFD. Participants received a brief instruction on the use of VFDs. Each ventilation session lasted four minutes and was performed twice under both conditions. Ventilation parameters, including tidal volume and ventilation rate, were recorded using the SimMan manikin and LLEAP software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in ventilation parameters were observed between the two conditions. Ventilation without the VFD was associated with a higher mean tidal volume (390.1 mL vs. 373.9 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher mean ventilation rate (8.9 breaths per minute [bpm] vs. 8.1 bpm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Minute ventilation was also significantly greater without the VFD (3504.0 mL vs. 3118.8 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Despite these differences, the use of the VFD led to a slight improvement in compliance with European Resuscitation Council (ERC) ventilation guidelines, increasing the rate of correct ventilations from 1% to 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the use of the VFD was associated with reductions in tidal volume and ventilation rate, it resulted in a modest improvement in adherence to ERC ventilation guidelines. The clinical impact of this device remains unclear. Future studies can focus on novel/innovative ways to enhance compliance with established ventilatory parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Real-Time Feedback Devices on Paramedic Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Lasik, Tomasz Kłosiewicz, Mateusz Puślecki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2552354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilation using a self-expanding bag and face mask poses important challenges, even for experienced healthcare professionals. Several devices have been developed and introduced to the market with the aim of improving the quality of bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a real-time ventilation feedback device (VFD) influences ventilation quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited one hundred paramedics to perform manual ventilation on a high-fidelity manikin using a BVM, first without and subsequently with the VFD. Participants received a brief instruction on the use of VFDs. Each ventilation session lasted four minutes and was performed twice under both conditions. Ventilation parameters, including tidal volume and ventilation rate, were recorded using the SimMan manikin and LLEAP software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in ventilation parameters were observed between the two conditions. Ventilation without the VFD was associated with a higher mean tidal volume (390.1 mL vs. 373.9 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher mean ventilation rate (8.9 breaths per minute [bpm] vs. 8.1 bpm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Minute ventilation was also significantly greater without the VFD (3504.0 mL vs. 3118.8 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Despite these differences, the use of the VFD led to a slight improvement in compliance with European Resuscitation Council (ERC) ventilation guidelines, increasing the rate of correct ventilations from 1% to 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the use of the VFD was associated with reductions in tidal volume and ventilation rate, it resulted in a modest improvement in adherence to ERC ventilation guidelines. The clinical impact of this device remains unclear. Future studies can focus on novel/innovative ways to enhance compliance with established ventilatory parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2552354\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2552354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:即使对经验丰富的医疗保健专业人员来说,使用自动膨胀袋和口罩进行通风也是一项重大挑战。为了提高袋-阀-面罩(BVM)通风的质量,已经开发了几种设备并推向市场。本研究的目的是评估实时通风反馈装置(VFD)的使用是否会影响通风质量。方法:本研究招募了100名护理人员,使用BVM对高保真假人进行手动通气,首先不使用VFD,随后使用VFD。与会者收到了关于vfd使用的简短说明。每次通气持续4分钟,在两种情况下均进行了两次。采用SimMan模型和LLEAP软件记录潮气量、通风量等通气参数。结果:两种情况下通气参数有显著差异。无VFD通气与较高的平均潮气量(390.1 mL对373.9 mL, p < 0.001)和较高的平均通气率(8.9次/分钟[bpm]对8.1次/分钟,p < 0.001)相关。无VFD时的分钟通气量也显著增加(3504.0 mL vs. 3118.8 mL, p < 0.001)。尽管存在这些差异,但VFD的使用使符合欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)通气指南的情况略有改善,将正确通气率从1%提高到3%。结论:虽然VFD的使用与潮气量和通气率的降低有关,但它对ERC通气指南的依从性有一定的改善。该装置的临床效果尚不清楚。未来的研究可以集中在新颖/创新的方法来提高对既定通气参数的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Real-Time Feedback Devices on Paramedic Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation Performance.

Objectives: Ventilation using a self-expanding bag and face mask poses important challenges, even for experienced healthcare professionals. Several devices have been developed and introduced to the market with the aim of improving the quality of bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a real-time ventilation feedback device (VFD) influences ventilation quality.

Methods: This study recruited one hundred paramedics to perform manual ventilation on a high-fidelity manikin using a BVM, first without and subsequently with the VFD. Participants received a brief instruction on the use of VFDs. Each ventilation session lasted four minutes and was performed twice under both conditions. Ventilation parameters, including tidal volume and ventilation rate, were recorded using the SimMan manikin and LLEAP software.

Results: Significant differences in ventilation parameters were observed between the two conditions. Ventilation without the VFD was associated with a higher mean tidal volume (390.1 mL vs. 373.9 mL, p < 0.001) and a higher mean ventilation rate (8.9 breaths per minute [bpm] vs. 8.1 bpm, p < 0.001). Minute ventilation was also significantly greater without the VFD (3504.0 mL vs. 3118.8 mL, p < 0.001). Despite these differences, the use of the VFD led to a slight improvement in compliance with European Resuscitation Council (ERC) ventilation guidelines, increasing the rate of correct ventilations from 1% to 3%.

Conclusions: While the use of the VFD was associated with reductions in tidal volume and ventilation rate, it resulted in a modest improvement in adherence to ERC ventilation guidelines. The clinical impact of this device remains unclear. Future studies can focus on novel/innovative ways to enhance compliance with established ventilatory parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信