大学生组织、时间管理和计划策略的超简短小组认知行为技能研讨会的可行性:研究协议。

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Vickie Plourde, Hélène Corriveau, Shirko Ahmadi
{"title":"大学生组织、时间管理和计划策略的超简短小组认知行为技能研讨会的可行性:研究协议。","authors":"Vickie Plourde, Hélène Corriveau, Shirko Ahmadi","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01696-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students with ADHD and executive functioning challenges are at a higher risk of experiencing academic and functional challenges. Group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting organization, time management, and planning skills have shown promise in improving attention and academic functioning. However, attendance and logistic barriers may limit participation in traditional programs. This feasibility study aims to adapt and evaluate the feasibility of delivering ultra-brief, group CBT skills workshops (both in-person and online) to university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized pilot design with a convergent mixed-method approach will be used. From January 2024 to April 2025, 40-60 French-speaking students from Canadian postsecondary institutions that are experiencing attentional or executive challenges (with or without a formal ADHD diagnosis) will be recruited. The intervention consists of three weekly 90-min workshops, with strategies focusing on organization, time management, planning and prioritizing tasks, and managing procrastination. Data will be collected at pre- and post-workshop interventions including recruitment and retention rates, as well as standardized questionnaires assessing treatment perception, acceptability, and satisfaction (primary outcomes), along with ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and functional impairment (secondary outcomes). Individual interviews (baseline evaluation) and focus groups (post-workshop evaluation) will further explore participants' functioning as well as expectations and experiences related to the intervention. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data will undergo qualitative descriptive analysis using rapid assessment procedure (RAP) sheets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will assess the \"feasibility of ultra-brief CBT skills workshops for university students with ADHD and executive functioning difficulties. If effective, it could inform scalable strategies to support academic success and daily functioning. Findings will also inform the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention for future large-scale studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of an ultra-brief group cognitive behavioral skills workshops for organization, time management, and planning strategies in university students: study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Vickie Plourde, Hélène Corriveau, Shirko Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-025-01696-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students with ADHD and executive functioning challenges are at a higher risk of experiencing academic and functional challenges. Group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting organization, time management, and planning skills have shown promise in improving attention and academic functioning. However, attendance and logistic barriers may limit participation in traditional programs. This feasibility study aims to adapt and evaluate the feasibility of delivering ultra-brief, group CBT skills workshops (both in-person and online) to university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-randomized pilot design with a convergent mixed-method approach will be used. From January 2024 to April 2025, 40-60 French-speaking students from Canadian postsecondary institutions that are experiencing attentional or executive challenges (with or without a formal ADHD diagnosis) will be recruited. The intervention consists of three weekly 90-min workshops, with strategies focusing on organization, time management, planning and prioritizing tasks, and managing procrastination. Data will be collected at pre- and post-workshop interventions including recruitment and retention rates, as well as standardized questionnaires assessing treatment perception, acceptability, and satisfaction (primary outcomes), along with ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and functional impairment (secondary outcomes). Individual interviews (baseline evaluation) and focus groups (post-workshop evaluation) will further explore participants' functioning as well as expectations and experiences related to the intervention. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data will undergo qualitative descriptive analysis using rapid assessment procedure (RAP) sheets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will assess the \\\"feasibility of ultra-brief CBT skills workshops for university students with ADHD and executive functioning difficulties. If effective, it could inform scalable strategies to support academic success and daily functioning. Findings will also inform the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention for future large-scale studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01696-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01696-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有ADHD和执行功能障碍的大学生在经历学业和功能障碍方面的风险更高。以组织、时间管理和计划技能为目标的群体认知行为疗法(CBT)在提高注意力和学术功能方面表现出了希望。然而,出勤率和后勤障碍可能会限制传统课程的参与。本可行性研究旨在适应和评估向大学生提供超简短的小组CBT技能研讨会(面对面和在线)的可行性。方法:采用收敛混合方法的非随机试验设计。从2024年1月到2025年4月,将招募40-60名来自加拿大高等教育机构的法语学生,这些学生正在经历注意力或执行能力的挑战(有或没有正式的ADHD诊断)。干预包括每周三次90分钟的研讨会,重点是组织、时间管理、计划和优先处理任务,以及管理拖延症。数据将在研讨会前和研讨会后的干预措施中收集,包括招募和保留率,以及评估治疗感知、可接受性和满意度的标准化问卷(主要结果),以及ADHD症状、执行功能和功能障碍(次要结果)。个别访谈(基线评估)和焦点小组(工作坊后评估)将进一步探讨参与者的功能以及与干预相关的期望和经验。定量数据将使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析,而定性数据将使用快速评估程序(RAP)表进行定性描述性分析。讨论:本研究将评估对患有多动症和执行功能障碍的大学生进行超简短CBT技能讲习班的可行性。如果有效,它可以为支持学业成功和日常运作的可扩展策略提供信息。研究结果还将为未来大规模研究提供这种干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of an ultra-brief group cognitive behavioral skills workshops for organization, time management, and planning strategies in university students: study protocol.

Background: University students with ADHD and executive functioning challenges are at a higher risk of experiencing academic and functional challenges. Group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting organization, time management, and planning skills have shown promise in improving attention and academic functioning. However, attendance and logistic barriers may limit participation in traditional programs. This feasibility study aims to adapt and evaluate the feasibility of delivering ultra-brief, group CBT skills workshops (both in-person and online) to university students.

Methods: A non-randomized pilot design with a convergent mixed-method approach will be used. From January 2024 to April 2025, 40-60 French-speaking students from Canadian postsecondary institutions that are experiencing attentional or executive challenges (with or without a formal ADHD diagnosis) will be recruited. The intervention consists of three weekly 90-min workshops, with strategies focusing on organization, time management, planning and prioritizing tasks, and managing procrastination. Data will be collected at pre- and post-workshop interventions including recruitment and retention rates, as well as standardized questionnaires assessing treatment perception, acceptability, and satisfaction (primary outcomes), along with ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and functional impairment (secondary outcomes). Individual interviews (baseline evaluation) and focus groups (post-workshop evaluation) will further explore participants' functioning as well as expectations and experiences related to the intervention. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whereas qualitative data will undergo qualitative descriptive analysis using rapid assessment procedure (RAP) sheets.

Discussion: This study will assess the "feasibility of ultra-brief CBT skills workshops for university students with ADHD and executive functioning difficulties. If effective, it could inform scalable strategies to support academic success and daily functioning. Findings will also inform the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention for future large-scale studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信