重度抑郁症II期平台试验的设计考虑。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michaela Maria Freitag, Dario Zocholl, Elias Laurin Meyer, Stefan M Gold, Marta Bofill Roig, Heidi De Smedt, Martin Posch, Franz König
{"title":"重度抑郁症II期平台试验的设计考虑。","authors":"Michaela Maria Freitag, Dario Zocholl, Elias Laurin Meyer, Stefan M Gold, Marta Bofill Roig, Heidi De Smedt, Martin Posch, Franz König","doi":"10.1002/pst.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability globally. Despite its prevalence, approximately one-third of patients do not benefit sufficiently from available treatments, and few new drugs have been developed recently. Consequently, more efficient methods are needed to evaluate a broader range of treatment options quickly. Platform trials offer a promising solution, as they allow for the assessment of multiple investigational treatments simultaneously by sharing control groups and by reducing both trial activation and patient recruitment times. The objective of this simulation study was to support the design and optimisation of a phase II superiority platform trial for MDD, considering the disease-specific characteristics. In particular, we assessed the efficiency of platform trials compared to traditional two-arm trials by investigating key design elements, including allocation and randomisation strategies, as well as per-treatment arm sample sizes and interim futility analyses. Through extensive simulations, we refined these design components and evaluated their impact on trial performance. The results demonstrated that platform trials not only enhance efficiency but also achieve higher statistical power in evaluating individual treatments compared to conventional trials. The efficiency of platform trials is particularly prominent when interim futility analyses are performed to eliminate treatments that have either no or a negligible treatment effect early. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into the design of platform trials in the superiority setting and underscores their potential to accelerate therapy development in MDD and other therapeutic areas, providing a flexible and powerful alternative to traditional trial designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 5","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design Considerations for a Phase II Platform Trial in Major Depressive Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Maria Freitag, Dario Zocholl, Elias Laurin Meyer, Stefan M Gold, Marta Bofill Roig, Heidi De Smedt, Martin Posch, Franz König\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pst.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability globally. Despite its prevalence, approximately one-third of patients do not benefit sufficiently from available treatments, and few new drugs have been developed recently. Consequently, more efficient methods are needed to evaluate a broader range of treatment options quickly. Platform trials offer a promising solution, as they allow for the assessment of multiple investigational treatments simultaneously by sharing control groups and by reducing both trial activation and patient recruitment times. The objective of this simulation study was to support the design and optimisation of a phase II superiority platform trial for MDD, considering the disease-specific characteristics. In particular, we assessed the efficiency of platform trials compared to traditional two-arm trials by investigating key design elements, including allocation and randomisation strategies, as well as per-treatment arm sample sizes and interim futility analyses. Through extensive simulations, we refined these design components and evaluated their impact on trial performance. The results demonstrated that platform trials not only enhance efficiency but also achieve higher statistical power in evaluating individual treatments compared to conventional trials. The efficiency of platform trials is particularly prominent when interim futility analyses are performed to eliminate treatments that have either no or a negligible treatment effect early. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into the design of platform trials in the superiority setting and underscores their potential to accelerate therapy development in MDD and other therapeutic areas, providing a flexible and powerful alternative to traditional trial designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"e70025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球致残的主要原因之一。尽管它很流行,但大约三分之一的患者没有从现有的治疗中充分受益,而且最近开发的新药很少。因此,需要更有效的方法来快速评估更广泛的治疗方案。平台试验提供了一个很有前景的解决方案,因为通过共享对照组,减少试验启动和患者招募时间,平台试验允许同时评估多种研究性治疗。该模拟研究的目的是支持MDD II期优势平台试验的设计和优化,考虑到疾病的特异性特征。特别是,我们通过调查关键设计元素,包括分配和随机化策略,以及每次治疗组样本量和中期无效分析,评估了平台试验与传统双臂试验相比的效率。通过广泛的模拟,我们改进了这些设计组件,并评估了它们对试验性能的影响。结果表明,与常规试验相比,平台试验不仅提高了效率,而且在评估个体治疗方面具有更高的统计能力。当进行中期无效分析以消除早期没有治疗效果或治疗效果可以忽略不计的治疗时,平台试验的效率尤为突出。总的来说,这项工作为优势环境下的平台试验设计提供了有价值的见解,并强调了它们加速重度抑郁症和其他治疗领域治疗发展的潜力,提供了传统试验设计的灵活而强大的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design Considerations for a Phase II Platform Trial in Major Depressive Disorder.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability globally. Despite its prevalence, approximately one-third of patients do not benefit sufficiently from available treatments, and few new drugs have been developed recently. Consequently, more efficient methods are needed to evaluate a broader range of treatment options quickly. Platform trials offer a promising solution, as they allow for the assessment of multiple investigational treatments simultaneously by sharing control groups and by reducing both trial activation and patient recruitment times. The objective of this simulation study was to support the design and optimisation of a phase II superiority platform trial for MDD, considering the disease-specific characteristics. In particular, we assessed the efficiency of platform trials compared to traditional two-arm trials by investigating key design elements, including allocation and randomisation strategies, as well as per-treatment arm sample sizes and interim futility analyses. Through extensive simulations, we refined these design components and evaluated their impact on trial performance. The results demonstrated that platform trials not only enhance efficiency but also achieve higher statistical power in evaluating individual treatments compared to conventional trials. The efficiency of platform trials is particularly prominent when interim futility analyses are performed to eliminate treatments that have either no or a negligible treatment effect early. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into the design of platform trials in the superiority setting and underscores their potential to accelerate therapy development in MDD and other therapeutic areas, providing a flexible and powerful alternative to traditional trial designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信