妊娠和先天性畸形的处方药:一项基于人群的安全性筛选研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anne Broe, Anton Pottegård, Trine Munk-Olsen, Jesper Hallas, Mette Bliddal, Irene Petersen, Per Damkier
{"title":"妊娠和先天性畸形的处方药:一项基于人群的安全性筛选研究。","authors":"Anne Broe, Anton Pottegård, Trine Munk-Olsen, Jesper Hallas, Mette Bliddal, Irene Petersen, Per Damkier","doi":"10.1002/pds.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Counseling women who are either pregnant or contemplating pregnancy on their use of prescribed drugs remains a major clinical challenge. Since the thalidomide tragedy in the 1960s, the use of drugs during pregnancy has been subject to widespread concern due to the potential for unwanted effects on the unborn child, notably major congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the risk of major congenital malformations following first trimester exposure to all marketed prescription drugs in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a population-based cohort study utilizing national health registries in Denmark. We studied all singleton livebirths in Denmark between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017, and we linked data from the National Danish Prescription Register, Birth Register, Patient Register, and Cause of Death Register. Using logistic regression analysis, we compared exposed liveborn to unexposed liveborn children while controlling for important confounders. The main outcome measure was major congenital malformations, and the secondary outcomes included organ-specific major congenital malformations as defined by EUROCAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 drugs with at least 5 livebirths with major congenital malformations, 31 were associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations compared to unexposed livebirths (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] ≥ 2.0). Compared to livebirths of women who discontinued treatment prior to pregnancy, 17 drugs with an increased risk (aOR ≥ 2.0) were identified. Among 115 drugs prescribed to ≥ 1000 women during the first trimester, only insulins had aORs ≥ 2.0 for overall major congenital malformations. There were > 100 drugs with no increased risk of major congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a complete nationwide dataset, > 100 null-associations between first-trimester drug exposure and overall major congenital malformations were documented. This provides important insights and reassurance to support pregnant women and inform shared decision making. We confirm previously known teratogenic drugs and other potential teratogenic drugs, clopidogrel and liraglutide, were identified. These latter associations should be addressed in future studies using disease-specific confounder control.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription Drugs in Pregnancy and Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Safety Screening Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Broe, Anton Pottegård, Trine Munk-Olsen, Jesper Hallas, Mette Bliddal, Irene Petersen, Per Damkier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Counseling women who are either pregnant or contemplating pregnancy on their use of prescribed drugs remains a major clinical challenge. Since the thalidomide tragedy in the 1960s, the use of drugs during pregnancy has been subject to widespread concern due to the potential for unwanted effects on the unborn child, notably major congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the risk of major congenital malformations following first trimester exposure to all marketed prescription drugs in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a population-based cohort study utilizing national health registries in Denmark. We studied all singleton livebirths in Denmark between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017, and we linked data from the National Danish Prescription Register, Birth Register, Patient Register, and Cause of Death Register. Using logistic regression analysis, we compared exposed liveborn to unexposed liveborn children while controlling for important confounders. The main outcome measure was major congenital malformations, and the secondary outcomes included organ-specific major congenital malformations as defined by EUROCAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 drugs with at least 5 livebirths with major congenital malformations, 31 were associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations compared to unexposed livebirths (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] ≥ 2.0). Compared to livebirths of women who discontinued treatment prior to pregnancy, 17 drugs with an increased risk (aOR ≥ 2.0) were identified. Among 115 drugs prescribed to ≥ 1000 women during the first trimester, only insulins had aORs ≥ 2.0 for overall major congenital malformations. There were > 100 drugs with no increased risk of major congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a complete nationwide dataset, > 100 null-associations between first-trimester drug exposure and overall major congenital malformations were documented. This provides important insights and reassurance to support pregnant women and inform shared decision making. We confirm previously known teratogenic drugs and other potential teratogenic drugs, clopidogrel and liraglutide, were identified. These latter associations should be addressed in future studies using disease-specific confounder control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"e70211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对怀孕或考虑怀孕的妇女使用处方药进行咨询仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。自20世纪60年代沙利度胺悲剧以来,怀孕期间使用药物一直受到广泛关注,因为它可能对未出生的孩子产生意想不到的影响,特别是严重的先天性畸形。目的:研究丹麦所有上市处方药在孕早期暴露后发生重大先天性畸形的风险。研究设计:这是一项基于人群的队列研究,利用丹麦的国家健康登记处。我们研究了2004年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间丹麦所有的单胎活产,并将丹麦国家处方登记册、出生登记册、患者登记册和死因登记册的数据联系起来。使用逻辑回归分析,我们在控制重要混杂因素的情况下,比较了暴露的活产儿和未暴露的活产儿。主要结局指标为主要先天性畸形,次要结局包括由EUROCAT定义的器官特异性主要先天性畸形。结果:在326种药物中,至少有5例存在严重先天性畸形的活产婴儿,与未暴露的活产婴儿相比,31种药物与严重先天性畸形的风险增加相关(校正优势比[aOR]≥2.0)。与怀孕前停止治疗的妇女的活产相比,确定了17种风险增加的药物(aOR≥2.0)。在妊娠早期给≥1000名妇女开过的115种药物中,只有胰岛素的总体重大先天性畸形aORs≥2.0。有100种药物没有增加重大先天性畸形的风险。结论:使用一个完整的全国数据集,记录了妊娠早期药物暴露与总体主要先天性畸形之间的100个零关联。这为支持孕妇和共同决策提供了重要的见解和保证。我们确认先前已知的致畸药物和其他潜在的致畸药物,氯吡格雷和利拉鲁肽,被确定。后一种关联应在未来使用疾病特异性混杂因素控制的研究中加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prescription Drugs in Pregnancy and Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Safety Screening Study.

Prescription Drugs in Pregnancy and Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Safety Screening Study.

Prescription Drugs in Pregnancy and Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Safety Screening Study.

Background: Counseling women who are either pregnant or contemplating pregnancy on their use of prescribed drugs remains a major clinical challenge. Since the thalidomide tragedy in the 1960s, the use of drugs during pregnancy has been subject to widespread concern due to the potential for unwanted effects on the unborn child, notably major congenital malformations.

Objective: To examine the risk of major congenital malformations following first trimester exposure to all marketed prescription drugs in Denmark.

Study design: This was a population-based cohort study utilizing national health registries in Denmark. We studied all singleton livebirths in Denmark between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017, and we linked data from the National Danish Prescription Register, Birth Register, Patient Register, and Cause of Death Register. Using logistic regression analysis, we compared exposed liveborn to unexposed liveborn children while controlling for important confounders. The main outcome measure was major congenital malformations, and the secondary outcomes included organ-specific major congenital malformations as defined by EUROCAT.

Results: Of 326 drugs with at least 5 livebirths with major congenital malformations, 31 were associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations compared to unexposed livebirths (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] ≥ 2.0). Compared to livebirths of women who discontinued treatment prior to pregnancy, 17 drugs with an increased risk (aOR ≥ 2.0) were identified. Among 115 drugs prescribed to ≥ 1000 women during the first trimester, only insulins had aORs ≥ 2.0 for overall major congenital malformations. There were > 100 drugs with no increased risk of major congenital malformations.

Conclusions: Using a complete nationwide dataset, > 100 null-associations between first-trimester drug exposure and overall major congenital malformations were documented. This provides important insights and reassurance to support pregnant women and inform shared decision making. We confirm previously known teratogenic drugs and other potential teratogenic drugs, clopidogrel and liraglutide, were identified. These latter associations should be addressed in future studies using disease-specific confounder control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信