Zhiwu Zhang, Shuning Liu, Jiashen Shao, Hai Meng, Jisheng Lin, Qi Fei
{"title":"实施经皮椎体成形术围手术期优化策略:临床应用和结果评估。","authors":"Zhiwu Zhang, Shuning Liu, Jiashen Shao, Hai Meng, Jisheng Lin, Qi Fei","doi":"10.1111/os.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), yet accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing complications remain critical clinical challenges that require urgent resolution. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of an optimized perioperative management strategy based on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in patients undergoing PVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2022 to April 2024, a total of 301 patients with OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively enrolled in the retrospective cohort study. Using May 2023 as the implementation time point for the optimized perioperative management strategy in our department, all subjects were divided into the traditional group (155 cases) and the optimized strategy (ERAS) group (146 cases). The two groups were analyzed for visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain at various time points before and after surgery, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at preoperative and 3 months postoperatively, postoperative first ambulation time, total length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative LOS, postoperative rehydration volume, and postoperative complications. Group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, while categorical variables were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Fisher's exact tests. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the traditional group, patients in the ERAS group exhibited significantly lower VAS pain scores at 2 and 4 h postoperatively, earlier postoperative first ambulation time, shorter total and postoperative LOS, and reduced postoperative intravenous rehydration volume (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative VAS scores, VAS scores at 24 h postoperatively and on the day of discharge, as well as in ODI scores both preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, the complication rates were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with OVCF, performing PVP under the optimized perioperative management strategy facilitates early pain relief, reduces the average LOS, shortens the postoperative first ambulation time, and significantly improves perioperative clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing an Optimized Perioperative Strategy for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: Clinical Application and Outcome Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiwu Zhang, Shuning Liu, Jiashen Shao, Hai Meng, Jisheng Lin, Qi Fei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), yet accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing complications remain critical clinical challenges that require urgent resolution. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of an optimized perioperative management strategy based on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in patients undergoing PVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2022 to April 2024, a total of 301 patients with OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively enrolled in the retrospective cohort study. Using May 2023 as the implementation time point for the optimized perioperative management strategy in our department, all subjects were divided into the traditional group (155 cases) and the optimized strategy (ERAS) group (146 cases). The two groups were analyzed for visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain at various time points before and after surgery, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at preoperative and 3 months postoperatively, postoperative first ambulation time, total length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative LOS, postoperative rehydration volume, and postoperative complications. Group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, while categorical variables were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Fisher's exact tests. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the traditional group, patients in the ERAS group exhibited significantly lower VAS pain scores at 2 and 4 h postoperatively, earlier postoperative first ambulation time, shorter total and postoperative LOS, and reduced postoperative intravenous rehydration volume (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative VAS scores, VAS scores at 24 h postoperatively and on the day of discharge, as well as in ODI scores both preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, the complication rates were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with OVCF, performing PVP under the optimized perioperative management strategy facilitates early pain relief, reduces the average LOS, shortens the postoperative first ambulation time, and significantly improves perioperative clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:经皮椎体成形术(PVP)是一种广泛应用于治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的微创手术,但加速术后恢复和减少并发症仍然是迫切需要解决的关键临床挑战。本研究旨在评估基于ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)概念的PVP患者围手术期管理策略的临床效果。方法:从2022年5月至2024年4月,对301例接受PVP治疗的OVCF患者进行回顾性队列研究。以2023年5月为我科围手术期优化管理策略实施时间点,将所有患者分为传统组(155例)和优化策略(ERAS)组(146例)。分析两组患者术前、术后各时间点腰痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术前、术后3个月Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、术后首次下床时间、总住院时间(LOS)、术后LOS、术后补液量、术后并发症。连续变量的组间比较采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,分类变量的组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。p值结果:与传统组相比,ERAS组患者术后2 h和4 h VAS疼痛评分明显降低,术后首次下床时间更早,总LOS和术后LOS更短,术后静脉补液量减少(p 0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:OVCF患者在优化的围手术期管理策略下行PVP有利于早期疼痛缓解,降低平均LOS,缩短术后首次下床时间,显著改善围手术期临床效果。
Implementing an Optimized Perioperative Strategy for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: Clinical Application and Outcome Evaluation.
Objective: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), yet accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing complications remain critical clinical challenges that require urgent resolution. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of an optimized perioperative management strategy based on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in patients undergoing PVP.
Methods: From May 2022 to April 2024, a total of 301 patients with OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively enrolled in the retrospective cohort study. Using May 2023 as the implementation time point for the optimized perioperative management strategy in our department, all subjects were divided into the traditional group (155 cases) and the optimized strategy (ERAS) group (146 cases). The two groups were analyzed for visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain at various time points before and after surgery, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at preoperative and 3 months postoperatively, postoperative first ambulation time, total length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative LOS, postoperative rehydration volume, and postoperative complications. Group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, while categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests or Fisher's exact tests. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Compared to the traditional group, patients in the ERAS group exhibited significantly lower VAS pain scores at 2 and 4 h postoperatively, earlier postoperative first ambulation time, shorter total and postoperative LOS, and reduced postoperative intravenous rehydration volume (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in preoperative VAS scores, VAS scores at 24 h postoperatively and on the day of discharge, as well as in ODI scores both preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, the complication rates were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: For patients with OVCF, performing PVP under the optimized perioperative management strategy facilitates early pain relief, reduces the average LOS, shortens the postoperative first ambulation time, and significantly improves perioperative clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery.
The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.