钙化腰椎间盘突出症矢状位分型及经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术的治疗分析。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1111/os.70152
Kai Zhang, Yingchuang Tang, Hanwen Li, Peng Peng, Xingbang Ruan, Xiangyan Zhen, Bin Meng, Huilin Yang, Junxin Zhang, Haiqing Mao, Kangwu Chen
{"title":"钙化腰椎间盘突出症矢状位分型及经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术的治疗分析。","authors":"Kai Zhang, Yingchuang Tang, Hanwen Li, Peng Peng, Xingbang Ruan, Xiangyan Zhen, Bin Meng, Huilin Yang, Junxin Zhang, Haiqing Mao, Kangwu Chen","doi":"10.1111/os.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcified lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) is one specific type of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, there are no uniform classification standards for different calcification degrees of herniated lumbar disc tissue. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has been proved to exhibit great efficacy in treating LDH, but whether it can achieve satisfactory results in treating CLDH with different calcification remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 271 patients who suffered from single CLDH (97 patients) or NCLDH (non-calcified lumbar disc herniation) who received PEID surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 in our hospital participated in this retrospective study. Moreover, CLDH was divided into four grades based on preoperative sagittal CT images, including 34 Grade I, 22 Grade II, 19 Grade III, and 22 Grade IV. Operative time was evaluated between the two groups. In addition, VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scale score were applied to assess the efficacy of PEID in treating CLDH with different calcification degrees by Student's t tests or χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients successfully underwent PEID surgery. According to the analysis, the operative time in the CLDH group was significantly longer than that in NCLDH group. Preoperative and postoperative VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores have no significant differences between the CLDH and NCLDH groups. Furthermore, postoperative modified MacNab scale scores and complication rates were almost the same in the two groups. However, there were some differences in terms of VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scores during LDH patients with different degrees of calcification. CLDH was divided into four grades in our study, and the analysis displayed that VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores after operation in the Grade IV CLDH group were both obviously higher than those in the control group. Moreover, the modified MacNab scale showed that excellent or good rates in the Grade IV CLDH group (73%) were lowest, and they were significantly lower than those in the control group (91%). The other statistical indexes such as recurrence and complication rates showed no significant difference in CLDH with different degrees of calcification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLDH was innovatively divided into four grades in our study. PEID is an effective and safe surgical method for treating CLDH; it can achieve a satisfactory outcome. However, it should be considered carefully in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with severe calcification (Grade IV).</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2887-2894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Zhang, Yingchuang Tang, Hanwen Li, Peng Peng, Xingbang Ruan, Xiangyan Zhen, Bin Meng, Huilin Yang, Junxin Zhang, Haiqing Mao, Kangwu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcified lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) is one specific type of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, there are no uniform classification standards for different calcification degrees of herniated lumbar disc tissue. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has been proved to exhibit great efficacy in treating LDH, but whether it can achieve satisfactory results in treating CLDH with different calcification remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 271 patients who suffered from single CLDH (97 patients) or NCLDH (non-calcified lumbar disc herniation) who received PEID surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 in our hospital participated in this retrospective study. Moreover, CLDH was divided into four grades based on preoperative sagittal CT images, including 34 Grade I, 22 Grade II, 19 Grade III, and 22 Grade IV. Operative time was evaluated between the two groups. In addition, VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scale score were applied to assess the efficacy of PEID in treating CLDH with different calcification degrees by Student's t tests or χ<sup>2</sup> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients successfully underwent PEID surgery. According to the analysis, the operative time in the CLDH group was significantly longer than that in NCLDH group. Preoperative and postoperative VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores have no significant differences between the CLDH and NCLDH groups. Furthermore, postoperative modified MacNab scale scores and complication rates were almost the same in the two groups. However, there were some differences in terms of VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scores during LDH patients with different degrees of calcification. CLDH was divided into four grades in our study, and the analysis displayed that VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores after operation in the Grade IV CLDH group were both obviously higher than those in the control group. Moreover, the modified MacNab scale showed that excellent or good rates in the Grade IV CLDH group (73%) were lowest, and they were significantly lower than those in the control group (91%). The other statistical indexes such as recurrence and complication rates showed no significant difference in CLDH with different degrees of calcification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLDH was innovatively divided into four grades in our study. PEID is an effective and safe surgical method for treating CLDH; it can achieve a satisfactory outcome. However, it should be considered carefully in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with severe calcification (Grade IV).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2887-2894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钙化腰椎间盘突出症(CLDH)是腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的一种特殊类型。目前对于腰椎间盘突出组织钙化程度的不同,尚无统一的分类标准。经皮内窥镜椎间椎间盘切除术(Percutaneous interlaminar disectomy, PEID)已被证实对LDH有很好的疗效,但对于不同钙化程度的CLDH是否能取得满意的效果尚不清楚。方法:选取我院2016年1月至2018年12月行PEID手术的单发CLDH(97例)或非钙化腰椎间盘突出症(NCLDH)患者271例进行回顾性研究。根据术前矢状位CT图像将CLDH分为4个级别,其中ⅰ级34例,ⅱ级22例,ⅲ级19例,ⅳ级22例。评估两组间的手术时间。采用VAS(腿部疼痛)评分、ODI评分、MacNab评分,采用Student’st检验或χ2检验评价PEID治疗不同钙化程度CLDH的疗效。结果:所有患者均成功行PEID手术。经分析,CLDH组的手术时间明显长于NCLDH组。CLDH组和NCLDH组术前、术后VAS(腿部疼痛)和ODI评分无显著差异。此外,两组术后改良MacNab评分和并发症发生率几乎相同。然而,不同钙化程度的LDH患者在VAS(腿部疼痛)、ODI和MacNab评分方面存在一定差异。我们的研究将CLDH分为4个等级,分析显示,ⅳ级CLDH组术后VAS(腿部疼痛)和ODI评分均明显高于对照组。此外,改良MacNab量表显示,ⅳ级CLDH组的优良率(73%)最低,显著低于对照组(91%)。不同钙化程度的CLDH复发率、并发症发生率等其他统计指标差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究创新性地将CLDH分为四个等级。PEID是治疗CLDH有效、安全的手术方法;它可以达到令人满意的结果。然而,在治疗伴有严重钙化的腰椎间盘突出症时应慎重考虑(IV级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

Background: Calcified lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) is one specific type of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, there are no uniform classification standards for different calcification degrees of herniated lumbar disc tissue. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has been proved to exhibit great efficacy in treating LDH, but whether it can achieve satisfactory results in treating CLDH with different calcification remains unclear.

Methods: A total of 271 patients who suffered from single CLDH (97 patients) or NCLDH (non-calcified lumbar disc herniation) who received PEID surgery between January 2016 and December 2018 in our hospital participated in this retrospective study. Moreover, CLDH was divided into four grades based on preoperative sagittal CT images, including 34 Grade I, 22 Grade II, 19 Grade III, and 22 Grade IV. Operative time was evaluated between the two groups. In addition, VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scale score were applied to assess the efficacy of PEID in treating CLDH with different calcification degrees by Student's t tests or χ2 test.

Results: All the patients successfully underwent PEID surgery. According to the analysis, the operative time in the CLDH group was significantly longer than that in NCLDH group. Preoperative and postoperative VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores have no significant differences between the CLDH and NCLDH groups. Furthermore, postoperative modified MacNab scale scores and complication rates were almost the same in the two groups. However, there were some differences in terms of VAS (leg pain), ODI, and MacNab scores during LDH patients with different degrees of calcification. CLDH was divided into four grades in our study, and the analysis displayed that VAS (leg pain) and ODI scores after operation in the Grade IV CLDH group were both obviously higher than those in the control group. Moreover, the modified MacNab scale showed that excellent or good rates in the Grade IV CLDH group (73%) were lowest, and they were significantly lower than those in the control group (91%). The other statistical indexes such as recurrence and complication rates showed no significant difference in CLDH with different degrees of calcification.

Conclusion: CLDH was innovatively divided into four grades in our study. PEID is an effective and safe surgical method for treating CLDH; it can achieve a satisfactory outcome. However, it should be considered carefully in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with severe calcification (Grade IV).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信