人工智能与传统方法在初次全髋关节置换术术前计划中的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1111/os.70156
Di Xue, Kaiyong Wang, Huan He, Liru Wang, Yupei Dai, Guohang Shen, Yang Chen, Jia Chen, Yiqiang Yang, Zhirong Chen, Xiaoyuan Wang, Chen Zhang, Yajing Su, Xue Lin
{"title":"人工智能与传统方法在初次全髋关节置换术术前计划中的比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Di Xue, Kaiyong Wang, Huan He, Liru Wang, Yupei Dai, Guohang Shen, Yang Chen, Jia Chen, Yiqiang Yang, Zhirong Chen, Xiaoyuan Wang, Chen Zhang, Yajing Su, Xue Lin","doi":"10.1111/os.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the application of artificial intelligence in orthopedics is becoming increasingly widespread, and initial progress has been made particularly in total hip arthroplasty (THA), its use in preoperative planning remains in the exploratory stage. Most existing studies are small-scale observational studies with inconsistent results, making it difficult to establish a unified clinical consensus. Therefore, our study aims to explore the latest research developments and potential unique advantages of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering all publications up to April 23, 2025. To evaluate study quality, we applied the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies. For the statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) were used to assess categorical variables, while mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Depending on the level of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted when substantial heterogeneity was detected (I<sup>2</sup> > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied. Through this process, a total of 518 studies were initially identified, of which 16 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated that, in comparison to traditional methods, artificial intelligence achieved significantly superior outcomes in several key areas: acetabular-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), femoral-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), postoperative leg length discrepancy (MD = -1.02), operative time (MD = -12.18 min), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -50.82 mL), and postoperative Harris hip score (MD = 1.42). Notably, the overall methodological quality of the included studies was generally high. The final results of the study indicate that, compared to traditional preoperative planning, artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA can provide more precise surgical guidance, reduce surgical risks, and improve the overall success rate of the procedure. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024619714.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2823-2834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Methods in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Di Xue, Kaiyong Wang, Huan He, Liru Wang, Yupei Dai, Guohang Shen, Yang Chen, Jia Chen, Yiqiang Yang, Zhirong Chen, Xiaoyuan Wang, Chen Zhang, Yajing Su, Xue Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the application of artificial intelligence in orthopedics is becoming increasingly widespread, and initial progress has been made particularly in total hip arthroplasty (THA), its use in preoperative planning remains in the exploratory stage. Most existing studies are small-scale observational studies with inconsistent results, making it difficult to establish a unified clinical consensus. Therefore, our study aims to explore the latest research developments and potential unique advantages of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering all publications up to April 23, 2025. To evaluate study quality, we applied the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies. For the statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) were used to assess categorical variables, while mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Depending on the level of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted when substantial heterogeneity was detected (I<sup>2</sup> > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied. Through this process, a total of 518 studies were initially identified, of which 16 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated that, in comparison to traditional methods, artificial intelligence achieved significantly superior outcomes in several key areas: acetabular-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), femoral-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), postoperative leg length discrepancy (MD = -1.02), operative time (MD = -12.18 min), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -50.82 mL), and postoperative Harris hip score (MD = 1.42). Notably, the overall methodological quality of the included studies was generally high. The final results of the study indicate that, compared to traditional preoperative planning, artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA can provide more precise surgical guidance, reduce surgical risks, and improve the overall success rate of the procedure. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024619714.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2823-2834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70156\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人工智能在骨科领域的应用越来越广泛,特别是在全髋关节置换术(THA)方面取得了初步进展,但其在术前规划中的应用仍处于探索阶段。现有研究多为小规模观察性研究,结果不一致,难以建立统一的临床共识。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨人工智能在THA术前规划中的最新研究进展和潜在的独特优势。我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library进行了全面的文献检索,涵盖了截至2025年4月23日的所有出版物。为了评估研究质量,我们对随机对照试验使用了修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具,对非随机研究使用了纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)。在统计分析中,使用比值比(OR)来评估分类变量,而计算连续结果的平均差异(MD)。根据异质性水平的不同,当检测到实质性异质性(I2 bb0 50%)时,采用随机效应模型;否则,采用固定效应模型。通过这一过程,共初步确定了518项研究,其中16项符合预先确定的纳入标准。合并分析表明,与传统方法相比,人工智能在髋臼侧匹配精度(OR = 0.24)、股侧匹配精度(OR = 0.24)、术后腿长差异(MD = -1.02)、手术时间(MD = -12.18 min)、术中出血量(MD = -50.82 mL)和术后Harris髋关节评分(MD = 1.42)等几个关键领域取得了显著优势。值得注意的是,纳入研究的总体方法学质量普遍较高。本研究最终结果表明,与传统术前规划相比,人工智能在THA术前规划中可以提供更精确的手术指导,降低手术风险,提高手术整体成功率。试验注册:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024619714。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Methods in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Methods in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Methods in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Methods in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Although the application of artificial intelligence in orthopedics is becoming increasingly widespread, and initial progress has been made particularly in total hip arthroplasty (THA), its use in preoperative planning remains in the exploratory stage. Most existing studies are small-scale observational studies with inconsistent results, making it difficult to establish a unified clinical consensus. Therefore, our study aims to explore the latest research developments and potential unique advantages of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering all publications up to April 23, 2025. To evaluate study quality, we applied the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies. For the statistical analysis, odds ratios (OR) were used to assess categorical variables, while mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Depending on the level of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted when substantial heterogeneity was detected (I2 > 50%); otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied. Through this process, a total of 518 studies were initially identified, of which 16 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated that, in comparison to traditional methods, artificial intelligence achieved significantly superior outcomes in several key areas: acetabular-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), femoral-side matching accuracy (OR = 0.24), postoperative leg length discrepancy (MD = -1.02), operative time (MD = -12.18 min), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -50.82 mL), and postoperative Harris hip score (MD = 1.42). Notably, the overall methodological quality of the included studies was generally high. The final results of the study indicate that, compared to traditional preoperative planning, artificial intelligence in preoperative planning for THA can provide more precise surgical guidance, reduce surgical risks, and improve the overall success rate of the procedure. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024619714.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信