即时护理和诊断经颅多普勒在儿科急症护理中的临床应用:范围综述。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Virginie Plante, Nicole O'Brien, Simon MacDonald, Laurence Tabone, Camille Jutras, Eric Dornoff, Catherine Boulet, Kerri LaRovere
{"title":"即时护理和诊断经颅多普勒在儿科急症护理中的临床应用:范围综述。","authors":"Virginie Plante, Nicole O'Brien, Simon MacDonald, Laurence Tabone, Camille Jutras, Eric Dornoff, Catherine Boulet, Kerri LaRovere","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02341-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is increasingly used in pediatric acute care with emerging point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) applications. However, no standardized definition distinguishes POCUS TCD from diagnostic/consultative TCD. This scoping review aims to (1) examine how the terminology \"POCUS TCD\" is used in pediatric literature, (2) describe physiologic indications driving TCD use in pediatric acute care settings, and (3) compare contexts of performance and operational characteristics across these indications. A comprehensive scoping review was conducted following published guidelines. Databases were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies addressing TCD use in children (≤ 18 years) in emergency departments, inpatient services, or intensive care units. Full-text eligibility and data extraction were performed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Of 4,066 screened studies, 660 full texts were assessed, and 307 studies met eligibility criteria (258 original studies and 49 reviews, guidelines, or surveys). The term \"POCUS TCD\" was mentioned in only 3% of original studies and 26% of included reviews and guidelines, which were mostly published after 2018. Eleven physiologic indications for TCD use were identified, and specific subtypes of context of use emerged. TCD operational characteristics varied widely and were often incompletely reported. However, notable differences were observed across physiologic indications, particularly in TCD extent, operator type, and use of point-of-care machines. The terminology \"POCUS TCD\" is infrequently used in current pediatric research, and most studies do not specify the type of TCD performed or intended. Significant differences in the context of performance and operational characteristics across physiologic indications suggest the coexistence of distinct forms of TCD in current clinical practice despite the lack of explicit distinction between POCUS and diagnostic/consultative TCD. Standardizing terminology and improving reporting of operational contexts in future research will be essential to support safe and effective clinical integration of TCD in pediatric critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Applications of Point-of-Care and Diagnostic Transcranial Doppler in the Pediatric Acute Care Setting: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Virginie Plante, Nicole O'Brien, Simon MacDonald, Laurence Tabone, Camille Jutras, Eric Dornoff, Catherine Boulet, Kerri LaRovere\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02341-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is increasingly used in pediatric acute care with emerging point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) applications. However, no standardized definition distinguishes POCUS TCD from diagnostic/consultative TCD. This scoping review aims to (1) examine how the terminology \\\"POCUS TCD\\\" is used in pediatric literature, (2) describe physiologic indications driving TCD use in pediatric acute care settings, and (3) compare contexts of performance and operational characteristics across these indications. A comprehensive scoping review was conducted following published guidelines. Databases were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies addressing TCD use in children (≤ 18 years) in emergency departments, inpatient services, or intensive care units. Full-text eligibility and data extraction were performed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Of 4,066 screened studies, 660 full texts were assessed, and 307 studies met eligibility criteria (258 original studies and 49 reviews, guidelines, or surveys). The term \\\"POCUS TCD\\\" was mentioned in only 3% of original studies and 26% of included reviews and guidelines, which were mostly published after 2018. Eleven physiologic indications for TCD use were identified, and specific subtypes of context of use emerged. TCD operational characteristics varied widely and were often incompletely reported. However, notable differences were observed across physiologic indications, particularly in TCD extent, operator type, and use of point-of-care machines. The terminology \\\"POCUS TCD\\\" is infrequently used in current pediatric research, and most studies do not specify the type of TCD performed or intended. Significant differences in the context of performance and operational characteristics across physiologic indications suggest the coexistence of distinct forms of TCD in current clinical practice despite the lack of explicit distinction between POCUS and diagnostic/consultative TCD. Standardizing terminology and improving reporting of operational contexts in future research will be essential to support safe and effective clinical integration of TCD in pediatric critical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02341-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02341-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅多普勒(TCD)越来越多地用于儿科急性护理与新兴的点护理超声(POCUS)的应用。然而,POCUS TCD与诊断性/咨询性TCD之间没有标准化的定义。本综述旨在(1)研究“POCUS TCD”这一术语在儿科文献中的使用情况,(2)描述驱动TCD在儿科急性护理环境中使用的生理适应症,以及(3)比较这些适应症的表现和操作特征。根据已公布的指导方针进行了全面的范围审查。数据库从成立到2024年6月进行检索,以研究急诊科、住院服务或重症监护病房儿童(≤18岁)TCD的使用情况。全文合格性和数据提取由独立审稿人一式两份进行。在4066项筛选的研究中,评估了660篇全文,307项研究符合资格标准(258项原始研究和49项综述、指南或调查)。“POCUS TCD”一词仅在3%的原始研究和26%的纳入评论和指南中被提及,这些研究大多是在2018年之后发表的。确定了使用TCD的11种生理适应症,并出现了使用背景的特定亚型。TCD的操作特点差别很大,而且经常报告不完整。然而,在生理适应症中观察到显着差异,特别是在TCD程度,操作人员类型和即时护理机器的使用方面。“POCUS TCD”这个术语在目前的儿科研究中很少使用,而且大多数研究都没有具体说明所进行或打算进行的TCD类型。尽管POCUS和诊断性/咨询性TCD之间缺乏明确的区分,但在生理适应症的表现和操作特征方面的显著差异表明,在当前的临床实践中,不同形式的TCD共存。在未来的研究中,标准化术语和改进操作环境的报告对于支持TCD在儿科重症监护中安全有效的临床整合至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Applications of Point-of-Care and Diagnostic Transcranial Doppler in the Pediatric Acute Care Setting: A Scoping Review.

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is increasingly used in pediatric acute care with emerging point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) applications. However, no standardized definition distinguishes POCUS TCD from diagnostic/consultative TCD. This scoping review aims to (1) examine how the terminology "POCUS TCD" is used in pediatric literature, (2) describe physiologic indications driving TCD use in pediatric acute care settings, and (3) compare contexts of performance and operational characteristics across these indications. A comprehensive scoping review was conducted following published guidelines. Databases were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies addressing TCD use in children (≤ 18 years) in emergency departments, inpatient services, or intensive care units. Full-text eligibility and data extraction were performed in duplicate by independent reviewers. Of 4,066 screened studies, 660 full texts were assessed, and 307 studies met eligibility criteria (258 original studies and 49 reviews, guidelines, or surveys). The term "POCUS TCD" was mentioned in only 3% of original studies and 26% of included reviews and guidelines, which were mostly published after 2018. Eleven physiologic indications for TCD use were identified, and specific subtypes of context of use emerged. TCD operational characteristics varied widely and were often incompletely reported. However, notable differences were observed across physiologic indications, particularly in TCD extent, operator type, and use of point-of-care machines. The terminology "POCUS TCD" is infrequently used in current pediatric research, and most studies do not specify the type of TCD performed or intended. Significant differences in the context of performance and operational characteristics across physiologic indications suggest the coexistence of distinct forms of TCD in current clinical practice despite the lack of explicit distinction between POCUS and diagnostic/consultative TCD. Standardizing terminology and improving reporting of operational contexts in future research will be essential to support safe and effective clinical integration of TCD in pediatric critical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信