pH值和裂解时间对DNA损伤检测的影响:中性和碱性彗星试验的比较。

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1093/mutage/geaf019
Ruzica Pribakovic, Julia Bornhorst, Helga Stopper, Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu
{"title":"pH值和裂解时间对DNA损伤检测的影响:中性和碱性彗星试验的比较。","authors":"Ruzica Pribakovic, Julia Bornhorst, Helga Stopper, Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The comet assay is a widely used method for measuring DNA damage and DNA repair. When DNA strand breaks happen, the supercoiling of DNA is relaxed and after alkaline or neutral electrophoresis, depending on the type of performed comet assay, DNA moves towards the anode, forming a comet tail. Thus, with increasing frequency of DNA strand breaks, an increase in the percentage of DNA in the tail is observed. The aim of this study was to compare systematically various steps like lysis, duration of electrophoresis and pH of the electrophoresis solution and their effect on the comet tail with regard to sensitivity for detection and quantification of DNA damage. We treated human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells with known genotoxic substances with a different mode of action and then performed both standard and modified alkaline and neutral comet assays. The Modifications included Fpg- and MspI-modified comet assays. Several aspects of this comparison are investigated for the first time here. The results obtained from these experiments showed a higher %DNA in tail in the alkaline comet assay compared to the neutral comet assay. Additionally, the lysis step was not critical in the alkaline comet assay, whereas it was essential for the neutral comet assay. Results from alkaline Fpg modified comet assay showed higher sensitivity in detecting single strand breaks and the neutral MspI modified comet assay was better in detecting DNA double strand breaks. Overall, our findings provided valuable insight into the differences between alkaline and neutral electrophoresis conditions in the comet assay and indicated that the alkaline comet assay is more sensitive for measuring total DNA damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18889,"journal":{"name":"Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pH and lysis duration on DNA damage detection: a Comparison of neutral and alkaline comet assays.\",\"authors\":\"Ruzica Pribakovic, Julia Bornhorst, Helga Stopper, Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mutage/geaf019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The comet assay is a widely used method for measuring DNA damage and DNA repair. When DNA strand breaks happen, the supercoiling of DNA is relaxed and after alkaline or neutral electrophoresis, depending on the type of performed comet assay, DNA moves towards the anode, forming a comet tail. Thus, with increasing frequency of DNA strand breaks, an increase in the percentage of DNA in the tail is observed. The aim of this study was to compare systematically various steps like lysis, duration of electrophoresis and pH of the electrophoresis solution and their effect on the comet tail with regard to sensitivity for detection and quantification of DNA damage. We treated human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells with known genotoxic substances with a different mode of action and then performed both standard and modified alkaline and neutral comet assays. The Modifications included Fpg- and MspI-modified comet assays. Several aspects of this comparison are investigated for the first time here. The results obtained from these experiments showed a higher %DNA in tail in the alkaline comet assay compared to the neutral comet assay. Additionally, the lysis step was not critical in the alkaline comet assay, whereas it was essential for the neutral comet assay. Results from alkaline Fpg modified comet assay showed higher sensitivity in detecting single strand breaks and the neutral MspI modified comet assay was better in detecting DNA double strand breaks. Overall, our findings provided valuable insight into the differences between alkaline and neutral electrophoresis conditions in the comet assay and indicated that the alkaline comet assay is more sensitive for measuring total DNA damage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaf019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaf019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

彗星试验是一种广泛使用的测量DNA损伤和DNA修复的方法。当DNA链断裂时,DNA的超卷曲被放松,在碱性或中性电泳后,根据所进行的彗星测定的类型,DNA向阳极移动,形成彗星尾巴。因此,随着DNA链断裂频率的增加,观察到尾巴中DNA百分比的增加。本研究的目的是系统地比较不同步骤,如裂解、电泳时间和电泳溶液的pH,以及它们对彗星尾DNA损伤检测和定量灵敏度的影响。我们用已知的基因毒性物质以不同的作用模式处理人淋巴母细胞样TK6细胞,然后进行标准和改良的碱性和中性彗星试验。修改包括Fpg-和mspi -修改的彗星测定。本文首次对这种比较的几个方面进行了研究。从这些实验中得到的结果表明,与中性彗星试验相比,碱性彗星试验的尾部DNA含量更高。此外,裂解步骤在碱性彗星实验中并不重要,而在中性彗星实验中却是必不可少的。结果表明,碱性Fpg修饰彗星法检测DNA单链断裂的灵敏度较高,中性MspI修饰彗星法检测DNA双链断裂的灵敏度较高。总的来说,我们的研究结果为彗星测定中碱性和中性电泳条件的差异提供了有价值的见解,并表明碱性彗星测定对测量总DNA损伤更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of pH and lysis duration on DNA damage detection: a Comparison of neutral and alkaline comet assays.

The comet assay is a widely used method for measuring DNA damage and DNA repair. When DNA strand breaks happen, the supercoiling of DNA is relaxed and after alkaline or neutral electrophoresis, depending on the type of performed comet assay, DNA moves towards the anode, forming a comet tail. Thus, with increasing frequency of DNA strand breaks, an increase in the percentage of DNA in the tail is observed. The aim of this study was to compare systematically various steps like lysis, duration of electrophoresis and pH of the electrophoresis solution and their effect on the comet tail with regard to sensitivity for detection and quantification of DNA damage. We treated human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells with known genotoxic substances with a different mode of action and then performed both standard and modified alkaline and neutral comet assays. The Modifications included Fpg- and MspI-modified comet assays. Several aspects of this comparison are investigated for the first time here. The results obtained from these experiments showed a higher %DNA in tail in the alkaline comet assay compared to the neutral comet assay. Additionally, the lysis step was not critical in the alkaline comet assay, whereas it was essential for the neutral comet assay. Results from alkaline Fpg modified comet assay showed higher sensitivity in detecting single strand breaks and the neutral MspI modified comet assay was better in detecting DNA double strand breaks. Overall, our findings provided valuable insight into the differences between alkaline and neutral electrophoresis conditions in the comet assay and indicated that the alkaline comet assay is more sensitive for measuring total DNA damage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mutagenesis is an international multi-disciplinary journal designed to bring together research aimed at the identification, characterization and elucidation of the mechanisms of action of physical, chemical and biological agents capable of producing genetic change in living organisms and the study of the consequences of such changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信