职业认同形成的基石:在医学教育中发展一种语言来表达要求、提供反馈和建立标准。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Katarina Kågedal, Tilda Jalakas, Emil Öberg, Anna-Karin Alvunger, Karin Thörne, Pieter C Barnhoorn, Éva Tamás
{"title":"职业认同形成的基石:在医学教育中发展一种语言来表达要求、提供反馈和建立标准。","authors":"Katarina Kågedal, Tilda Jalakas, Emil Öberg, Anna-Karin Alvunger, Karin Thörne, Pieter C Barnhoorn, Éva Tamás","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What was the educational challenge?: </strong>Due to the complexity of professionalism, medical education worldwide has implemented support and assessment tools based on unprofessional behavior to help students with professional identity formation (PIF). Despite attempts to conceptualize professionalism, providing a framework for faculty members and students is still challenging.</p><p><strong>What was the solution?: </strong>To provide a simple yet clear framework to support and assess clinical and preclinical settings, we used four domains for PIF: Involvement, Integrity, Interaction, and Introspection. These domains, originally used to describe unprofessional behavior, were redefined with positive attributes to form a new framework.</p><p><strong>How was the solution implemented?: </strong>By focusing on professional qualities to promote desirable traits for PIF, rather than deficiencies. The framework was introduced in clinical rotations for formative and summative assessment, used in reflection groups and written reflections, and later applied in preclinical tutorial groups.</p><p><strong>What lessons were learned that are relevant to a wider global audience?: </strong>The framework of cornerstones supports constructive feedback and coaching, is resource-light, requires no technology, and is adaptable to various educational environments.</p><p><strong>What are the next steps?: </strong>The framework can be adapted to other health professions and cultures. A longitudinal study is planned to assess its long-term impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cornerstones of professional identity formation: Developing a language to express requirements, provide feedback, and establish standards in medical education.\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Kågedal, Tilda Jalakas, Emil Öberg, Anna-Karin Alvunger, Karin Thörne, Pieter C Barnhoorn, Éva Tamás\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>What was the educational challenge?: </strong>Due to the complexity of professionalism, medical education worldwide has implemented support and assessment tools based on unprofessional behavior to help students with professional identity formation (PIF). Despite attempts to conceptualize professionalism, providing a framework for faculty members and students is still challenging.</p><p><strong>What was the solution?: </strong>To provide a simple yet clear framework to support and assess clinical and preclinical settings, we used four domains for PIF: Involvement, Integrity, Interaction, and Introspection. These domains, originally used to describe unprofessional behavior, were redefined with positive attributes to form a new framework.</p><p><strong>How was the solution implemented?: </strong>By focusing on professional qualities to promote desirable traits for PIF, rather than deficiencies. The framework was introduced in clinical rotations for formative and summative assessment, used in reflection groups and written reflections, and later applied in preclinical tutorial groups.</p><p><strong>What lessons were learned that are relevant to a wider global audience?: </strong>The framework of cornerstones supports constructive feedback and coaching, is resource-light, requires no technology, and is adaptable to various educational environments.</p><p><strong>What are the next steps?: </strong>The framework can be adapted to other health professions and cultures. A longitudinal study is planned to assess its long-term impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育方面的挑战是什么?由于专业的复杂性,世界各地的医学教育项目已经实施了一些新的基于不专业行为的支持和评估工具,以帮助学生形成他们的专业身份。尽管多次尝试将专业主义概念化,但为教师和学生提供一个框架仍然具有挑战性。解决办法是什么?为了提供一个简单而清晰的框架来支持和评估临床和临床前环境,我们使用了四个领域来形成职业认同:参与、完整性、互动和内省。这些领域以前被建议用来描述不专业的行为。在创建新的职业认同形成(PIF)框架时,每个领域都由非职业行为的特征转化为专业特征。解决方案是如何实现的?通过描述专业素质而不是非专业素质,我们打算将重点转移到PIF所需的特征上。基础框架最初是作为临床轮转的形成性和总结性评估引入的,用于反思小组的前馈,以及临床轮转期间讨论经验的相关书面反思,然后也用于医学生的临床前辅导小组。吸取了哪些与更广泛的全球受众相关的教训?该框架使教师能够提供建设性的、具体的反馈,并指导学生发展他们未来的职业。该框架对资源不敏感,可以在各种环境中无技术或系统障碍地实施,因此易于在临床前和临床环境中实施。下一步是什么?基石框架可以很容易地适应其他卫生专业人员和文化背景。这四个领域及其分母是通用的,并不局限于医学学生的PIF。计划进行一项纵向研究,以评估其对专业发展的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cornerstones of professional identity formation: Developing a language to express requirements, provide feedback, and establish standards in medical education.

What was the educational challenge?: Due to the complexity of professionalism, medical education worldwide has implemented support and assessment tools based on unprofessional behavior to help students with professional identity formation (PIF). Despite attempts to conceptualize professionalism, providing a framework for faculty members and students is still challenging.

What was the solution?: To provide a simple yet clear framework to support and assess clinical and preclinical settings, we used four domains for PIF: Involvement, Integrity, Interaction, and Introspection. These domains, originally used to describe unprofessional behavior, were redefined with positive attributes to form a new framework.

How was the solution implemented?: By focusing on professional qualities to promote desirable traits for PIF, rather than deficiencies. The framework was introduced in clinical rotations for formative and summative assessment, used in reflection groups and written reflections, and later applied in preclinical tutorial groups.

What lessons were learned that are relevant to a wider global audience?: The framework of cornerstones supports constructive feedback and coaching, is resource-light, requires no technology, and is adaptable to various educational environments.

What are the next steps?: The framework can be adapted to other health professions and cultures. A longitudinal study is planned to assess its long-term impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信