Maria Mylopoulos, Naomi Steenhof, Timothy Mickleborough, Adelle Atkinson, Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis
{"title":"从挣扎到力量:在临床学习中拥抱富有成效的失败。","authors":"Maria Mylopoulos, Naomi Steenhof, Timothy Mickleborough, Adelle Atkinson, Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has become increasingly apparent that healthcare is characterized by a great degree of novelty, ambiguity, and complexity. Traditional approaches to education in the health professions that emphasize the acquisition and assessment of isolated knowledge and skills as the gold standard do not prepare learners to adapt, innovate, and continue to learn throughout their careers. Productive failure, originating in the adaptive expertise literature, is an evidence-based instructional approach that has been shown to prepare students across the continuum of education for future learning. However, while productive failure is frequently used in classrooms, less is known about how to apply this approach in a clinical learning environment where learners are expected to learn while also fulfilling the work expectations of taking care of patients. In this paper, we define productive failure, describe research on how productive failure supports the development of adaptive expertise, and introduce the pedagogical implications of this work for educators, learners, administrators and patients. Drawing on cognitive and socio-culture research, and insights from quality improvement strategies, we will discuss how the clinical learning environment can be leveraged to ensure that learning through struggle is productive and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From struggle to strength: Embracing productive failure in clinical learning.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Mylopoulos, Naomi Steenhof, Timothy Mickleborough, Adelle Atkinson, Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has become increasingly apparent that healthcare is characterized by a great degree of novelty, ambiguity, and complexity. Traditional approaches to education in the health professions that emphasize the acquisition and assessment of isolated knowledge and skills as the gold standard do not prepare learners to adapt, innovate, and continue to learn throughout their careers. Productive failure, originating in the adaptive expertise literature, is an evidence-based instructional approach that has been shown to prepare students across the continuum of education for future learning. However, while productive failure is frequently used in classrooms, less is known about how to apply this approach in a clinical learning environment where learners are expected to learn while also fulfilling the work expectations of taking care of patients. In this paper, we define productive failure, describe research on how productive failure supports the development of adaptive expertise, and introduce the pedagogical implications of this work for educators, learners, administrators and patients. Drawing on cognitive and socio-culture research, and insights from quality improvement strategies, we will discuss how the clinical learning environment can be leveraged to ensure that learning through struggle is productive and safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2550477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From struggle to strength: Embracing productive failure in clinical learning.
It has become increasingly apparent that healthcare is characterized by a great degree of novelty, ambiguity, and complexity. Traditional approaches to education in the health professions that emphasize the acquisition and assessment of isolated knowledge and skills as the gold standard do not prepare learners to adapt, innovate, and continue to learn throughout their careers. Productive failure, originating in the adaptive expertise literature, is an evidence-based instructional approach that has been shown to prepare students across the continuum of education for future learning. However, while productive failure is frequently used in classrooms, less is known about how to apply this approach in a clinical learning environment where learners are expected to learn while also fulfilling the work expectations of taking care of patients. In this paper, we define productive failure, describe research on how productive failure supports the development of adaptive expertise, and introduce the pedagogical implications of this work for educators, learners, administrators and patients. Drawing on cognitive and socio-culture research, and insights from quality improvement strategies, we will discuss how the clinical learning environment can be leveraged to ensure that learning through struggle is productive and safe.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.