在腹疝修补中,初次筋膜闭合可降低复发率和补片膨出:PROSECO随机临床试验。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Mikael Lindmark,Jael Tall,Bahman Darkahi,Johanna Österberg,Karin Strigård,Anders Thorell,Ulf Gunnarsson
{"title":"在腹疝修补中,初次筋膜闭合可降低复发率和补片膨出:PROSECO随机临床试验。","authors":"Mikael Lindmark,Jael Tall,Bahman Darkahi,Johanna Österberg,Karin Strigård,Anders Thorell,Ulf Gunnarsson","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nLaparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a bridging technique has shown high rates of hernia site complications. Primary fascial closure before mesh placement has been utilized to address this. This randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicentre controlled trial investigated whether primary fascial closure reduces hernia site complications.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAdults undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for a midline hernia were randomized to primary fascial closure or bridging. Clinical assessment and the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire were completed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. CT scans were performed pre- and 12 months post-surgery. It was hypothesized that non-resorbable suture closure would reduce complication rates from 30% to 13% at 12 months, requiring 180 patients for 80% power and 95% significance.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOne hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized (97 closure, 95 bridging), with 173 (90%) completing 1-year follow-up. At 12 months, overall hernia site complication rates showed no significant difference clinically (18% versus 20%, P = 0.85) or on CT (25% versus 28%, P = 0.50). However, recurrence and mesh bulging were significantly lower with fascial closure (4% versus 20%, P = 0.006). This group also reported significantly less pain at 12 months.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAlthough there was no difference in the primary endpoint, fascial closure resulted in significantly lower rates of recurrence and mesh bulging, along with reduced postoperative pain. These findings suggest that primary fascial closure should be recommended alongside intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair in midline hernias.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nThe trial was registered at the ISRCTN at the start of the trial (ISRCTN51495042).","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mikael Lindmark,Jael Tall,Bahman Darkahi,Johanna Österberg,Karin Strigård,Anders Thorell,Ulf Gunnarsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znaf169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nLaparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a bridging technique has shown high rates of hernia site complications. Primary fascial closure before mesh placement has been utilized to address this. This randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicentre controlled trial investigated whether primary fascial closure reduces hernia site complications.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAdults undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for a midline hernia were randomized to primary fascial closure or bridging. Clinical assessment and the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire were completed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. CT scans were performed pre- and 12 months post-surgery. It was hypothesized that non-resorbable suture closure would reduce complication rates from 30% to 13% at 12 months, requiring 180 patients for 80% power and 95% significance.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOne hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized (97 closure, 95 bridging), with 173 (90%) completing 1-year follow-up. At 12 months, overall hernia site complication rates showed no significant difference clinically (18% versus 20%, P = 0.85) or on CT (25% versus 28%, P = 0.50). However, recurrence and mesh bulging were significantly lower with fascial closure (4% versus 20%, P = 0.006). This group also reported significantly less pain at 12 months.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nAlthough there was no difference in the primary endpoint, fascial closure resulted in significantly lower rates of recurrence and mesh bulging, along with reduced postoperative pain. These findings suggest that primary fascial closure should be recommended alongside intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair in midline hernias.\\r\\n\\r\\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\\r\\nThe trial was registered at the ISRCTN at the start of the trial (ISRCTN51495042).\",\"PeriodicalId\":136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf169\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用桥接技术的腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术显示出疝气部位并发症的高发生率。在补片放置前进行初级筋膜闭合已被用来解决这个问题。这项随机、平行、双盲、多中心对照试验调查了初级筋膜闭合是否能减少疝部位并发症。方法接受腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补中线疝的成人患者随机分为初级筋膜闭合组和桥接组。术前、术后3个月和12个月分别完成临床评估和腹疝疼痛问卷。术前和术后12个月分别进行CT扫描。假设不可吸收缝线闭合可将12个月的并发症发生率从30%降低到13%,需要180例患者达到80%的疗效和95%的显著性。结果随机抽取192例患者(闭合97例,桥接95例),其中173例(90%)完成1年随访。在12个月时,总的疝部位并发症发生率在临床(18%对20%,P = 0.85)或CT(25%对28%,P = 0.50)上无显著差异。然而,筋膜闭合后复发率和补片膨出率明显降低(4%比20%,P = 0.006)。该组在12个月时疼痛也明显减轻。结论虽然主要终点没有差异,但筋膜闭合导致复发率和补片膨出率明显降低,术后疼痛减轻。这些结果表明,在中线疝中,应推荐初级筋膜闭合和腹腔内补片修复。试验注册在试验开始时在ISRCTN注册(ISRCTN51495042)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a bridging technique has shown high rates of hernia site complications. Primary fascial closure before mesh placement has been utilized to address this. This randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicentre controlled trial investigated whether primary fascial closure reduces hernia site complications. METHODS Adults undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for a midline hernia were randomized to primary fascial closure or bridging. Clinical assessment and the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire were completed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. CT scans were performed pre- and 12 months post-surgery. It was hypothesized that non-resorbable suture closure would reduce complication rates from 30% to 13% at 12 months, requiring 180 patients for 80% power and 95% significance. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized (97 closure, 95 bridging), with 173 (90%) completing 1-year follow-up. At 12 months, overall hernia site complication rates showed no significant difference clinically (18% versus 20%, P = 0.85) or on CT (25% versus 28%, P = 0.50). However, recurrence and mesh bulging were significantly lower with fascial closure (4% versus 20%, P = 0.006). This group also reported significantly less pain at 12 months. CONCLUSION Although there was no difference in the primary endpoint, fascial closure resulted in significantly lower rates of recurrence and mesh bulging, along with reduced postoperative pain. These findings suggest that primary fascial closure should be recommended alongside intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair in midline hernias. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered at the ISRCTN at the start of the trial (ISRCTN51495042).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信