Christian Dumps, Stefanie Nothofer, Manfred Weiss, Wolfgang Hoelz, Rainer J Litz, Robert Bocher, Felicitas Kies, Richard Funk, Axel Rüdiger Heller, Philipp Simon
{"title":"斜矢入路治疗腰丛神经阻滞与Chayen技术的比较。","authors":"Christian Dumps, Stefanie Nothofer, Manfred Weiss, Wolfgang Hoelz, Rainer J Litz, Robert Bocher, Felicitas Kies, Richard Funk, Axel Rüdiger Heller, Philipp Simon","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S527808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Substantial understanding of anatomic landmarks remains mandatory for regional anesthesia procedures of the lower limbs, even in times of ultrasound-guided techniques. Theoretically, applying a diagonal vector (DIVE) from the posterior superior iliac spine towards the spinous process of lumbar vertebra 3 leads to a higher error tolerance and closer nerve approximation when compared to Chayen's approach. The purpose of this study was to compare both techniques regarding clinical applicability, accuracy and risk profile.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Lumbar plexus block was performed bilaterally according to Chayen's technique and the DIVE method in embalmed bodies donated to science. The posterior medial half of the psoas major muscle was predefined as the puncture target area. Essential anatomical landmarks were labelled, photographed and a computer-aided analysis of the images was conducted. Both approaches were compared regarding the puncture success rate, spatial nerve approximation and complications such as vessel or kidney punctures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both techniques were applied bilaterally on 34 embalmed bodies (50% male, mean age ± standard deviation 82 ± 8 years, height 167 ± 10cm) and led to similar success rates of a psoas muscle hit (Chayen vs DIVE 86.3% vs 82.8%). DIVE punctures were more often localized in the medial third of the psoas (p<0.001), whereas the risk for vessel or kidney punctures was similar (p=0.473; p=0.367, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Punctures according to the DIVE method resulted in a higher puncture accuracy compared to Chayen's technique with comparable practicability and risk profile. When using the DIVE Block, a window for a successful puncture can be expected between a quarter and a third of the PSIS- L3SP distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"18 ","pages":"67-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagonal Vector (DIVE) Approach for Lumbar Plexus Block - A Comparison with Chayen's Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Dumps, Stefanie Nothofer, Manfred Weiss, Wolfgang Hoelz, Rainer J Litz, Robert Bocher, Felicitas Kies, Richard Funk, Axel Rüdiger Heller, Philipp Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S527808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Substantial understanding of anatomic landmarks remains mandatory for regional anesthesia procedures of the lower limbs, even in times of ultrasound-guided techniques. Theoretically, applying a diagonal vector (DIVE) from the posterior superior iliac spine towards the spinous process of lumbar vertebra 3 leads to a higher error tolerance and closer nerve approximation when compared to Chayen's approach. The purpose of this study was to compare both techniques regarding clinical applicability, accuracy and risk profile.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Lumbar plexus block was performed bilaterally according to Chayen's technique and the DIVE method in embalmed bodies donated to science. The posterior medial half of the psoas major muscle was predefined as the puncture target area. Essential anatomical landmarks were labelled, photographed and a computer-aided analysis of the images was conducted. Both approaches were compared regarding the puncture success rate, spatial nerve approximation and complications such as vessel or kidney punctures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both techniques were applied bilaterally on 34 embalmed bodies (50% male, mean age ± standard deviation 82 ± 8 years, height 167 ± 10cm) and led to similar success rates of a psoas muscle hit (Chayen vs DIVE 86.3% vs 82.8%). DIVE punctures were more often localized in the medial third of the psoas (p<0.001), whereas the risk for vessel or kidney punctures was similar (p=0.473; p=0.367, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Punctures according to the DIVE method resulted in a higher puncture accuracy compared to Chayen's technique with comparable practicability and risk profile. When using the DIVE Block, a window for a successful puncture can be expected between a quarter and a third of the PSIS- L3SP distance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"67-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S527808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S527808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:对解剖标志的充分了解仍然是下肢区域麻醉手术的必要条件,即使在超声引导技术的时代。从理论上讲,与Chayen入路相比,从髂后上棘向腰椎棘突3应用斜向矢量(DIVE)可获得更高的容错性和更接近的神经近似。本研究的目的是比较两种技术在临床适用性、准确性和风险方面的差异。患者和方法:采用Chayen技术和DIVE方法对捐赠给科学研究的防腐尸体进行双侧腰丛神经阻滞。腰大肌后内侧半部预先确定为穿刺靶区。必要的解剖标志被标记,拍摄和计算机辅助分析的图像进行。比较两种入路的穿刺成功率、空间神经逼近及血管或肾脏穿刺等并发症。结果:两种技术分别应用于34具防腐尸体(50%为男性,平均年龄±标准差82±8岁,身高167±10cm),腰肌撞击成功率相似(Chayen vs DIVE分别为86.3% vs 82.8%)。DIVE穿刺更常定位于腰肌内侧三分之一(结论:与Chayen技术相比,DIVE穿刺方法具有更高的穿刺准确性,具有相当的实用性和风险。当使用DIVE Block时,预期成功穿刺的窗口在PSIS- L3SP距离的四分之一到三分之一之间。
The Diagonal Vector (DIVE) Approach for Lumbar Plexus Block - A Comparison with Chayen's Technique.
Purpose: Substantial understanding of anatomic landmarks remains mandatory for regional anesthesia procedures of the lower limbs, even in times of ultrasound-guided techniques. Theoretically, applying a diagonal vector (DIVE) from the posterior superior iliac spine towards the spinous process of lumbar vertebra 3 leads to a higher error tolerance and closer nerve approximation when compared to Chayen's approach. The purpose of this study was to compare both techniques regarding clinical applicability, accuracy and risk profile.
Patients and methods: Lumbar plexus block was performed bilaterally according to Chayen's technique and the DIVE method in embalmed bodies donated to science. The posterior medial half of the psoas major muscle was predefined as the puncture target area. Essential anatomical landmarks were labelled, photographed and a computer-aided analysis of the images was conducted. Both approaches were compared regarding the puncture success rate, spatial nerve approximation and complications such as vessel or kidney punctures.
Results: Both techniques were applied bilaterally on 34 embalmed bodies (50% male, mean age ± standard deviation 82 ± 8 years, height 167 ± 10cm) and led to similar success rates of a psoas muscle hit (Chayen vs DIVE 86.3% vs 82.8%). DIVE punctures were more often localized in the medial third of the psoas (p<0.001), whereas the risk for vessel or kidney punctures was similar (p=0.473; p=0.367, respectively).
Conclusion: Punctures according to the DIVE method resulted in a higher puncture accuracy compared to Chayen's technique with comparable practicability and risk profile. When using the DIVE Block, a window for a successful puncture can be expected between a quarter and a third of the PSIS- L3SP distance.