{"title":"美国和加拿大兽医学校尸体和终端动物使用的公共记录综述。","authors":"Robin M Chadwin, Crystal L Heath, Ryan W Merkley","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterinary students, interns, and residents have often been taught medical and surgical skills using cadavers or terminal surgeries. However, the number of animals used by veterinary schools, their sources, and the types of procedures taught have never been quantified. In this study, active Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols in which animals were euthanized prior to, during, or following training exercises were requested from public veterinary schools in the United States and Canada between December 2022 and April 2024. Protocols were evaluated for the number and species of animals requested, animal source, and types of procedures taught. Additionally, we identified seven justifications for using animals provided by principal investigators (PIs) and evaluated how closely they adhered to ethical guidelines set forth by the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges. A total of 26 veterinary schools provided 120 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols meeting the study criteria. Equines (24/26 schools), cows (20/26), and small ruminants (19/26) were the most commonly requested species by school, although poultry were requested in the highest numbers (8,558). Sources included client donations, commercial vendors, and university-owned animals. The most common justifications for using animals in teaching were that alternatives do not provide an equal learning experience (87/120 protocols) and that live animals are needed for students to learn nonsurgical (71/120) and surgical (65/120) procedures. There was considerable variation in how closely aligned animal use practices were to AAVMC recommendations. Limitations include probable undercounting of cadavers and the inability to verify the numbers of animals used versus requested for use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20240092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Public Records Review of Cadaver and Terminal Animal Use in US and Canadian Veterinary Schools.\",\"authors\":\"Robin M Chadwin, Crystal L Heath, Ryan W Merkley\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2024-0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Veterinary students, interns, and residents have often been taught medical and surgical skills using cadavers or terminal surgeries. However, the number of animals used by veterinary schools, their sources, and the types of procedures taught have never been quantified. In this study, active Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols in which animals were euthanized prior to, during, or following training exercises were requested from public veterinary schools in the United States and Canada between December 2022 and April 2024. Protocols were evaluated for the number and species of animals requested, animal source, and types of procedures taught. Additionally, we identified seven justifications for using animals provided by principal investigators (PIs) and evaluated how closely they adhered to ethical guidelines set forth by the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges. A total of 26 veterinary schools provided 120 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols meeting the study criteria. Equines (24/26 schools), cows (20/26), and small ruminants (19/26) were the most commonly requested species by school, although poultry were requested in the highest numbers (8,558). Sources included client donations, commercial vendors, and university-owned animals. The most common justifications for using animals in teaching were that alternatives do not provide an equal learning experience (87/120 protocols) and that live animals are needed for students to learn nonsurgical (71/120) and surgical (65/120) procedures. There was considerable variation in how closely aligned animal use practices were to AAVMC recommendations. Limitations include probable undercounting of cadavers and the inability to verify the numbers of animals used versus requested for use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20240092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
兽医专业的学生、实习生和住院医师经常学习使用尸体或晚期手术的医学和外科技能。然而,兽医学校使用的动物数量、来源和所教授的程序类型从未被量化。在这项研究中,在2022年12月至2024年4月期间,美国和加拿大的公立兽医学校要求积极的机构动物护理和使用委员会协议,在训练演习之前,期间或之后对动物实施安乐死。对实验方案进行评估,包括所要求动物的数量和种类、动物来源和所教授的程序类型。此外,我们确定了主要研究者(pi)使用动物的七个理由,并评估了他们遵守美国兽医学院协会(American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges)制定的道德准则的程度。共有26所兽医学校提供了120个符合研究标准的机构动物护理和使用委员会协议。马(24/26组)、牛(20/26组)和小反刍动物(19/26组)是各学校最常见的请求种,但请求数量最多的是家禽(8,558组)。来源包括客户捐赠、商业供应商和大学拥有的动物。在教学中使用动物的最常见理由是替代方案不能提供平等的学习体验(87/120协议),并且学生需要活体动物来学习非手术(71/120)和手术(65/120)程序。动物使用实践与AAVMC建议的一致程度存在相当大的差异。限制包括可能少算尸体,以及无法核实使用的动物数量与要求使用的动物数量。
A Public Records Review of Cadaver and Terminal Animal Use in US and Canadian Veterinary Schools.
Veterinary students, interns, and residents have often been taught medical and surgical skills using cadavers or terminal surgeries. However, the number of animals used by veterinary schools, their sources, and the types of procedures taught have never been quantified. In this study, active Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols in which animals were euthanized prior to, during, or following training exercises were requested from public veterinary schools in the United States and Canada between December 2022 and April 2024. Protocols were evaluated for the number and species of animals requested, animal source, and types of procedures taught. Additionally, we identified seven justifications for using animals provided by principal investigators (PIs) and evaluated how closely they adhered to ethical guidelines set forth by the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges. A total of 26 veterinary schools provided 120 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols meeting the study criteria. Equines (24/26 schools), cows (20/26), and small ruminants (19/26) were the most commonly requested species by school, although poultry were requested in the highest numbers (8,558). Sources included client donations, commercial vendors, and university-owned animals. The most common justifications for using animals in teaching were that alternatives do not provide an equal learning experience (87/120 protocols) and that live animals are needed for students to learn nonsurgical (71/120) and surgical (65/120) procedures. There was considerable variation in how closely aligned animal use practices were to AAVMC recommendations. Limitations include probable undercounting of cadavers and the inability to verify the numbers of animals used versus requested for use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society.
The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.