Gayatri Jaiswal, Michael Grimes, Patricia Bononi, Nishit Vaghasia, Saira Khan, Kersthine Andre, Ashni Dharia, Jamil Alkhaddo
{"title":"放射前碘扫描在甲状腺癌中的作用。","authors":"Gayatri Jaiswal, Michael Grimes, Patricia Bononi, Nishit Vaghasia, Saira Khan, Kersthine Andre, Ashni Dharia, Jamil Alkhaddo","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvaf128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is an evolving role for radioactive iodine (RAI) in thyroid cancer treatment. Radioactive iodine treatment usually involves a pre-RAI whole-body iodine scan and a posttherapy scan. The clinical utility of pre-RAI therapy scans has been increasingly questioned.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of pre-RAI whole-body iodine scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of differentiated thyroid cancer patients treated with RAI. Using records blinded for pre-RAI scans, 3 endocrinologists developed empiric RAI treatment plans for each patient based on surgical pathology. This was repeated using the unblinded records, and the treatment plans made with and without pre-RAI scan results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 patients met the inclusion criteria: 89 patients (54.3%) were low risk, 61 (37.2%) intermediate risk, and 14 (8.5%) high risk for thyroid cancer recurrence. After blinded review, RAI treatment was recommended for 122 patients (74.3%); 46 were determined to be appropriate for a low-dose RAI, 75 a medium dose, and 1 a high dose. When unblinded, different recommendations were made for only 7 patients (5.7%), with 6 being recommended for a higher RAI dose. In addition, the prescan RAI results prompted recommendations for additional testing, such as neck ultrasounds or computed tomography or postoperative thyroglobulin levels. Pre-RAI scans affected patient care plans in only 7 (5.7%) of the 164 patients in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most patients with thyroid cancer who may need RAI, pre-RAI scans may not affect management, and empiric RAI doses may be a more cost-effective and convenient option.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"9 9","pages":"bvaf128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of Preradioactive Iodine Scans in Thyroid Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Gayatri Jaiswal, Michael Grimes, Patricia Bononi, Nishit Vaghasia, Saira Khan, Kersthine Andre, Ashni Dharia, Jamil Alkhaddo\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jendso/bvaf128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is an evolving role for radioactive iodine (RAI) in thyroid cancer treatment. Radioactive iodine treatment usually involves a pre-RAI whole-body iodine scan and a posttherapy scan. The clinical utility of pre-RAI therapy scans has been increasingly questioned.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of pre-RAI whole-body iodine scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of differentiated thyroid cancer patients treated with RAI. Using records blinded for pre-RAI scans, 3 endocrinologists developed empiric RAI treatment plans for each patient based on surgical pathology. This was repeated using the unblinded records, and the treatment plans made with and without pre-RAI scan results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 patients met the inclusion criteria: 89 patients (54.3%) were low risk, 61 (37.2%) intermediate risk, and 14 (8.5%) high risk for thyroid cancer recurrence. After blinded review, RAI treatment was recommended for 122 patients (74.3%); 46 were determined to be appropriate for a low-dose RAI, 75 a medium dose, and 1 a high dose. When unblinded, different recommendations were made for only 7 patients (5.7%), with 6 being recommended for a higher RAI dose. In addition, the prescan RAI results prompted recommendations for additional testing, such as neck ultrasounds or computed tomography or postoperative thyroglobulin levels. Pre-RAI scans affected patient care plans in only 7 (5.7%) of the 164 patients in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In most patients with thyroid cancer who may need RAI, pre-RAI scans may not affect management, and empiric RAI doses may be a more cost-effective and convenient option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"bvaf128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378553/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Usefulness of Preradioactive Iodine Scans in Thyroid Cancer.
Context: There is an evolving role for radioactive iodine (RAI) in thyroid cancer treatment. Radioactive iodine treatment usually involves a pre-RAI whole-body iodine scan and a posttherapy scan. The clinical utility of pre-RAI therapy scans has been increasingly questioned.
Aim: To evaluate the clinical utility of pre-RAI whole-body iodine scans.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of differentiated thyroid cancer patients treated with RAI. Using records blinded for pre-RAI scans, 3 endocrinologists developed empiric RAI treatment plans for each patient based on surgical pathology. This was repeated using the unblinded records, and the treatment plans made with and without pre-RAI scan results were compared.
Results: A total of 164 patients met the inclusion criteria: 89 patients (54.3%) were low risk, 61 (37.2%) intermediate risk, and 14 (8.5%) high risk for thyroid cancer recurrence. After blinded review, RAI treatment was recommended for 122 patients (74.3%); 46 were determined to be appropriate for a low-dose RAI, 75 a medium dose, and 1 a high dose. When unblinded, different recommendations were made for only 7 patients (5.7%), with 6 being recommended for a higher RAI dose. In addition, the prescan RAI results prompted recommendations for additional testing, such as neck ultrasounds or computed tomography or postoperative thyroglobulin levels. Pre-RAI scans affected patient care plans in only 7 (5.7%) of the 164 patients in the study.
Conclusion: In most patients with thyroid cancer who may need RAI, pre-RAI scans may not affect management, and empiric RAI doses may be a more cost-effective and convenient option.