我们错过了谁?:描述代表性不足人口的原则方法。

IF 3 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Harsh Parikh, Rachael K Ross, Elizabeth Stuart, Kara E Rudolph
{"title":"我们错过了谁?:描述代表性不足人口的原则方法。","authors":"Harsh Parikh, Rachael K Ross, Elizabeth Stuart, Kara E Rudolph","doi":"10.1080/01621459.2025.2495319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the cornerstone for understanding causal effects, yet extending inferences to target populations presents challenges due to effect heterogeneity and underrepresentation. Our paper addresses the critical issue of identifying and characterizing underrepresented subgroups in RCTs, proposing a novel framework for refining target populations to improve generalizability. We introduce an optimization-based approach, Rashomon Set of Optimal Trees (ROOT), to characterize underrepresented groups. ROOT optimizes the target subpopulation distribution by minimizing the variance of the target average treatment effect estimate, ensuring more precise treatment effect estimations. Notably, ROOT generates interpretable characteristics of the underrepresented population, aiding researchers in effective communication. Our approach demonstrates improved precision and interpretability compared to alternatives, as illustrated with synthetic data experiments. We apply our methodology to extend inferences from the Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies (START) trial - investigating the effectiveness of medication for opioid use disorder - to the real-world population represented by the Treatment Episode Dataset: Admissions (TEDS-A). By refining target populations using ROOT, our framework offers a systematic approach to enhance decision-making accuracy and inform future trials in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Who Are We Missing?</i>: A Principled Approach to Characterizing the Underrepresented Population.\",\"authors\":\"Harsh Parikh, Rachael K Ross, Elizabeth Stuart, Kara E Rudolph\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01621459.2025.2495319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the cornerstone for understanding causal effects, yet extending inferences to target populations presents challenges due to effect heterogeneity and underrepresentation. Our paper addresses the critical issue of identifying and characterizing underrepresented subgroups in RCTs, proposing a novel framework for refining target populations to improve generalizability. We introduce an optimization-based approach, Rashomon Set of Optimal Trees (ROOT), to characterize underrepresented groups. ROOT optimizes the target subpopulation distribution by minimizing the variance of the target average treatment effect estimate, ensuring more precise treatment effect estimations. Notably, ROOT generates interpretable characteristics of the underrepresented population, aiding researchers in effective communication. Our approach demonstrates improved precision and interpretability compared to alternatives, as illustrated with synthetic data experiments. We apply our methodology to extend inferences from the Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies (START) trial - investigating the effectiveness of medication for opioid use disorder - to the real-world population represented by the Treatment Episode Dataset: Admissions (TEDS-A). By refining target populations using ROOT, our framework offers a systematic approach to enhance decision-making accuracy and inform future trials in diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Statistical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12393784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Statistical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2025.2495319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2025.2495319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机对照试验(RCTs)是理解因果效应的基础,但由于效果异质性和代表性不足,将推论扩展到目标人群存在挑战。我们的论文解决了在随机对照试验中识别和描述代表性不足的亚群的关键问题,提出了一个新的框架来完善目标人群以提高普遍性。我们引入了一种基于优化的方法,罗生门最优树集(ROOT),以表征代表性不足的群体。ROOT通过最小化目标平均治疗效果估计的方差来优化目标亚群分布,确保更精确的治疗效果估计。值得注意的是,ROOT生成了代表性不足的人口的可解释特征,帮助研究人员进行有效的沟通。与其他方法相比,我们的方法证明了精度和可解释性的提高,如合成数据实验所示。我们应用我们的方法将从激动剂替代疗法开始治疗(START)试验(调查阿片类药物使用障碍药物的有效性)的推论扩展到由治疗集数据集:入院(TEDS-A)代表的现实世界人群。通过使用ROOT优化目标人群,我们的框架提供了系统的方法来提高决策准确性,并为未来在不同人群中的试验提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Are We Missing?: A Principled Approach to Characterizing the Underrepresented Population.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the cornerstone for understanding causal effects, yet extending inferences to target populations presents challenges due to effect heterogeneity and underrepresentation. Our paper addresses the critical issue of identifying and characterizing underrepresented subgroups in RCTs, proposing a novel framework for refining target populations to improve generalizability. We introduce an optimization-based approach, Rashomon Set of Optimal Trees (ROOT), to characterize underrepresented groups. ROOT optimizes the target subpopulation distribution by minimizing the variance of the target average treatment effect estimate, ensuring more precise treatment effect estimations. Notably, ROOT generates interpretable characteristics of the underrepresented population, aiding researchers in effective communication. Our approach demonstrates improved precision and interpretability compared to alternatives, as illustrated with synthetic data experiments. We apply our methodology to extend inferences from the Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies (START) trial - investigating the effectiveness of medication for opioid use disorder - to the real-world population represented by the Treatment Episode Dataset: Admissions (TEDS-A). By refining target populations using ROOT, our framework offers a systematic approach to enhance decision-making accuracy and inform future trials in diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
168
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Established in 1888 and published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, the Journal of the American Statistical Association ( JASA ) has long been considered the premier journal of statistical science. Articles focus on statistical applications, theory, and methods in economic, social, physical, engineering, and health sciences. Important books contributing to statistical advancement are reviewed in JASA . JASA is indexed in Current Index to Statistics and MathSci Online and reviewed in Mathematical Reviews. JASA is abstracted by Access Company and is indexed and abstracted in the SRM Database of Social Research Methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信