护理计数的连续性:高级临床医生骨折诊所的患者满意度。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Emi Schwab, Shanika De Silva, Kristin Livingston
{"title":"护理计数的连续性:高级临床医生骨折诊所的患者满意度。","authors":"Emi Schwab, Shanika De Silva, Kristin Livingston","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma centers may utilize fracture clinics primarily staffed by advanced practice clinicians (APC) for management of basic fractures that typically require few visits. It is unclear if provider continuity is important in these brief health care encounters. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between continuity of care and patient satisfaction scores in APC-run urgent/fracture clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective IRB-approved study at a pediatric tertiary-care Level-1 trauma hospital. We reviewed prospectively collected Press Ganey data from 2021 to 2023 for acute injury/fracture patients seen in a pediatric orthopaedic fracture clinic, which is APC-staffed and physician-supervised. Demographic and clinical data were collected along with the results of 4 Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey items (recommend provider, teamwork, recommend practice, overall rating). Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to determine independent predictors of patient satisfaction, including the effect of continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 follow-up encounters were reviewed. Median age was 11 years (range, 0 to 17). The majority of patients were male (59%), White (75%), with a very high child opportunity index (72%). Patients who saw the same provider at follow-up had a higher proportion of top-box ratings compared with those who saw a different provider for 3 of 4 outcomes: 88% versus 76% for staff teamwork (P=0.04), 94% versus 78% for recommend practice (P=0.003), and 93% versus 76% for overall rating of care (P=0.003). After adjusting for consistency of care, location, age, sex, child opportunity index, injury region, and geographical distance from clinic, the odds of receiving a top-box rating for recommend practice were 4.7 times higher (P=0.004) and 3.8 times higher for overall rating (P=0.002) for patients with continuity of care-provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuity of APC care-provider has a positive impact on patient satisfaction in a pediatric fracture clinic, as patients who saw the same provider in successive follow-up visits. Demographic, geographic, and clinical factors had comparatively little effect on patient satisfaction. The provider remains a fundamental factor in patient experience.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuity of Care Counts: Patient Satisfaction in Advanced Practice Clinician Fracture Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Emi Schwab, Shanika De Silva, Kristin Livingston\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma centers may utilize fracture clinics primarily staffed by advanced practice clinicians (APC) for management of basic fractures that typically require few visits. It is unclear if provider continuity is important in these brief health care encounters. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between continuity of care and patient satisfaction scores in APC-run urgent/fracture clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective IRB-approved study at a pediatric tertiary-care Level-1 trauma hospital. We reviewed prospectively collected Press Ganey data from 2021 to 2023 for acute injury/fracture patients seen in a pediatric orthopaedic fracture clinic, which is APC-staffed and physician-supervised. Demographic and clinical data were collected along with the results of 4 Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey items (recommend provider, teamwork, recommend practice, overall rating). Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to determine independent predictors of patient satisfaction, including the effect of continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 follow-up encounters were reviewed. Median age was 11 years (range, 0 to 17). The majority of patients were male (59%), White (75%), with a very high child opportunity index (72%). Patients who saw the same provider at follow-up had a higher proportion of top-box ratings compared with those who saw a different provider for 3 of 4 outcomes: 88% versus 76% for staff teamwork (P=0.04), 94% versus 78% for recommend practice (P=0.003), and 93% versus 76% for overall rating of care (P=0.003). After adjusting for consistency of care, location, age, sex, child opportunity index, injury region, and geographical distance from clinic, the odds of receiving a top-box rating for recommend practice were 4.7 times higher (P=0.004) and 3.8 times higher for overall rating (P=0.002) for patients with continuity of care-provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuity of APC care-provider has a positive impact on patient satisfaction in a pediatric fracture clinic, as patients who saw the same provider in successive follow-up visits. Demographic, geographic, and clinical factors had comparatively little effect on patient satisfaction. The provider remains a fundamental factor in patient experience.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤中心可以利用主要由高级临床医生(APC)配备的骨折诊所来管理通常需要很少就诊的基础骨折。目前尚不清楚在这些短暂的卫生保健接触中,提供者的连续性是否重要。本研究的目的是确定apc急诊/骨折诊所护理连续性与患者满意度评分之间的关系。方法:这是一项在一家儿科三级护理一级创伤医院进行的回顾性irb批准的研究。我们前瞻性地回顾了从2021年到2023年在儿科骨科骨折诊所看到的急性损伤/骨折患者的Press Ganey数据,该诊所由apc工作人员和医生监督。统计资料和临床资料以及Press Ganey患者满意度调查4个项目(推荐提供者、团队合作、推荐实践、总体评分)的结果。采用单变量和多变量模型来确定患者满意度的独立预测因子,包括护理连续性的影响。结果:共回顾了230例随访病例。中位年龄为11岁(范围0至17岁)。大多数患者为男性(59%),白人(75%),儿童机会指数非常高(72%)。在随访中看同一医生的患者与看不同医生的患者相比,在4个结果中的3个结果中,有更高比例的top-box评分:88%对76%的员工团队合作(P=0.04), 94%对78%的推荐做法(P=0.003), 93%对76%的整体护理评分(P=0.003)。在调整护理一致性、地点、年龄、性别、儿童机会指数、损伤区域和与诊所的地理距离后,对于连续性护理提供者的患者,获得推荐实践顶盒评分的几率高出4.7倍(P=0.004),总体评分高出3.8倍(P=0.002)。结论:APC护理人员的连续性对儿童骨折门诊患者满意度有积极影响,因为患者在连续随访中看到同一名护理人员。人口统计学、地理和临床因素对患者满意度的影响相对较小。提供者仍然是患者体验的基本因素。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuity of Care Counts: Patient Satisfaction in Advanced Practice Clinician Fracture Clinics.

Background: Trauma centers may utilize fracture clinics primarily staffed by advanced practice clinicians (APC) for management of basic fractures that typically require few visits. It is unclear if provider continuity is important in these brief health care encounters. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between continuity of care and patient satisfaction scores in APC-run urgent/fracture clinics.

Methods: This was a retrospective IRB-approved study at a pediatric tertiary-care Level-1 trauma hospital. We reviewed prospectively collected Press Ganey data from 2021 to 2023 for acute injury/fracture patients seen in a pediatric orthopaedic fracture clinic, which is APC-staffed and physician-supervised. Demographic and clinical data were collected along with the results of 4 Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey items (recommend provider, teamwork, recommend practice, overall rating). Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to determine independent predictors of patient satisfaction, including the effect of continuity of care.

Results: A total of 230 follow-up encounters were reviewed. Median age was 11 years (range, 0 to 17). The majority of patients were male (59%), White (75%), with a very high child opportunity index (72%). Patients who saw the same provider at follow-up had a higher proportion of top-box ratings compared with those who saw a different provider for 3 of 4 outcomes: 88% versus 76% for staff teamwork (P=0.04), 94% versus 78% for recommend practice (P=0.003), and 93% versus 76% for overall rating of care (P=0.003). After adjusting for consistency of care, location, age, sex, child opportunity index, injury region, and geographical distance from clinic, the odds of receiving a top-box rating for recommend practice were 4.7 times higher (P=0.004) and 3.8 times higher for overall rating (P=0.002) for patients with continuity of care-provider.

Conclusions: Continuity of APC care-provider has a positive impact on patient satisfaction in a pediatric fracture clinic, as patients who saw the same provider in successive follow-up visits. Demographic, geographic, and clinical factors had comparatively little effect on patient satisfaction. The provider remains a fundamental factor in patient experience.

Level of evidence: Level II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信