食物数量和质量对坦桑尼亚姆万扎湾(维多利亚湖)水蚤生活史的影响

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Journal of Plankton Research Pub Date : 2025-08-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/plankt/fbaf042
Ilse J M Cornelissen, Jacobus Vijverberg, Theo H Frank, Leopold A J Nagelkerke
{"title":"食物数量和质量对坦桑尼亚姆万扎湾(维多利亚湖)水蚤生活史的影响","authors":"Ilse J M Cornelissen, Jacobus Vijverberg, Theo H Frank, Leopold A J Nagelkerke","doi":"10.1093/plankt/fbaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until the 1950s, large-bodied calanoids and cladocerans dominated the zooplankton community of Lake Victoria, whereas cyclopoid copepods only comprised 10% of microcrustaceans. From the 1960's onwards, cyclopoid copepods increased to 70-90% of zooplankton and cladocerans, now dominated by small species, decreased to ca. 5%. Concomitantly phytoplankton biomass increased and shifted from dominance of diatoms to Cyanobacteria, which were hypothesized to be of less nutritional quality, causing the shift in zooplankton. We investigated whether the natural assemblage of Cyanobacteria in Mwanza Gulf negatively affected growth and fecundity of cladocerans. In 2010-2011, we performed life-history experiments with the cladoceran <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i>, feeding it natural seston from Mwanza Gulf from three different locations. A laboratory-strain of the green alga <i>Scenedesmus obliquus</i>, proven to be high-quality food, was used as a control. Growth of <i>D. lumholtzi</i> in the rainy season and at one station in the dry season was just as high as in the control treatment. If there were negative effects of natural seston these were small. Although the evidence is circumstantial, this suggests that Cyanobacteria and/or their detritus could have been better food than expected and that food quality is not limiting the growth of <i>D. lumholtzi</i> in <i>L. Victoria</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plankton Research","volume":"47 5","pages":"fbaf042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of food quantity and quality on the life history of <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i> in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Tanzania).\",\"authors\":\"Ilse J M Cornelissen, Jacobus Vijverberg, Theo H Frank, Leopold A J Nagelkerke\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/plankt/fbaf042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Until the 1950s, large-bodied calanoids and cladocerans dominated the zooplankton community of Lake Victoria, whereas cyclopoid copepods only comprised 10% of microcrustaceans. From the 1960's onwards, cyclopoid copepods increased to 70-90% of zooplankton and cladocerans, now dominated by small species, decreased to ca. 5%. Concomitantly phytoplankton biomass increased and shifted from dominance of diatoms to Cyanobacteria, which were hypothesized to be of less nutritional quality, causing the shift in zooplankton. We investigated whether the natural assemblage of Cyanobacteria in Mwanza Gulf negatively affected growth and fecundity of cladocerans. In 2010-2011, we performed life-history experiments with the cladoceran <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i>, feeding it natural seston from Mwanza Gulf from three different locations. A laboratory-strain of the green alga <i>Scenedesmus obliquus</i>, proven to be high-quality food, was used as a control. Growth of <i>D. lumholtzi</i> in the rainy season and at one station in the dry season was just as high as in the control treatment. If there were negative effects of natural seston these were small. Although the evidence is circumstantial, this suggests that Cyanobacteria and/or their detritus could have been better food than expected and that food quality is not limiting the growth of <i>D. lumholtzi</i> in <i>L. Victoria</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plankton Research\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"fbaf042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plankton Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbaf042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plankton Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbaf042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到20世纪50年代,维多利亚湖的浮游动物群落中主要是大型鱿鱼类和枝海洋类,而小甲壳类动物中只有10%是cyclopoid桡足类。从20世纪60年代开始,在浮游动物中,摆线类桡足类增加到70-90%,而现在以小种为主的枝海类则减少到5%左右。与此同时,浮游植物生物量增加,并从硅藻的优势转向蓝藻,后者被假设为营养质量较低,导致浮游动物的转变。我们调查了蓝藻在姆万扎湾的自然聚集是否会对支大洋的生长和繁殖力产生负面影响。2010年至2011年,我们对支海水蚤(Daphnia lumholtzi)进行了生活史实验,从三个不同的地点给它喂食姆万扎湾(Mwanza Gulf)的天然海藻。一种被证明是高品质食品的绿藻(Scenedesmus obliquus)实验室菌株作为对照。在雨季和旱季有一个站点的生长情况与对照处理相同。如果有自然季节的负面影响,这些影响很小。虽然证据是间接的,但这表明蓝藻和/或它们的碎屑可能是比预期更好的食物,而且食物质量并没有限制D. lumholtzi在L. Victoria的生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of food quantity and quality on the life history of <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i> in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Tanzania).

Effects of food quantity and quality on the life history of <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i> in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Tanzania).

Effects of food quantity and quality on the life history of <i>Daphnia lumholtzi</i> in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Tanzania).

Effects of food quantity and quality on the life history of Daphnia lumholtzi in Mwanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Tanzania).

Until the 1950s, large-bodied calanoids and cladocerans dominated the zooplankton community of Lake Victoria, whereas cyclopoid copepods only comprised 10% of microcrustaceans. From the 1960's onwards, cyclopoid copepods increased to 70-90% of zooplankton and cladocerans, now dominated by small species, decreased to ca. 5%. Concomitantly phytoplankton biomass increased and shifted from dominance of diatoms to Cyanobacteria, which were hypothesized to be of less nutritional quality, causing the shift in zooplankton. We investigated whether the natural assemblage of Cyanobacteria in Mwanza Gulf negatively affected growth and fecundity of cladocerans. In 2010-2011, we performed life-history experiments with the cladoceran Daphnia lumholtzi, feeding it natural seston from Mwanza Gulf from three different locations. A laboratory-strain of the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus, proven to be high-quality food, was used as a control. Growth of D. lumholtzi in the rainy season and at one station in the dry season was just as high as in the control treatment. If there were negative effects of natural seston these were small. Although the evidence is circumstantial, this suggests that Cyanobacteria and/or their detritus could have been better food than expected and that food quality is not limiting the growth of D. lumholtzi in L. Victoria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plankton Research
Journal of Plankton Research 生物-海洋学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Plankton Research publishes innovative papers that significantly advance the field of plankton research, and in particular, our understanding of plankton dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信