预测首次髋部骨折5年内对侧第二次髋部骨折风险:指导患者/家属咨询和骨健康治疗的新风险工具

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Christopher J Pettit, Carolyn F Herbosa, Jacob A Linker, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda
{"title":"预测首次髋部骨折5年内对侧第二次髋部骨折风险:指导患者/家属咨询和骨健康治疗的新风险工具","authors":"Christopher J Pettit, Carolyn F Herbosa, Jacob A Linker, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a \"risk matrix\" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/].</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III Diagnostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Contralateral Second Hip Fracture Risk Within 5 Years of First Hip Fracture: A New Risk Tool to Guide Patient/Family Counseling and Bone Health Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Pettit, Carolyn F Herbosa, Jacob A Linker, Abhishek Ganta, Kenneth A Egol, Sanjit R Konda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a \\\"risk matrix\\\" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/].</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III Diagnostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发一种分层工具来识别有第二次对侧髋部骨折风险的髋部骨折患者和指数骨折后5年内死亡的患者,并评估高风险/低死亡率患者预防性固定的成本-效果。方法:设计:回顾性预后队列研究。设置:单一学制,2个一级创伤中心,1个骨科专科医院,1个三级护理医院。患者选择标准:纳入2014年1月11日至2023年11月31日期间60岁及以上低能机制OTA 31A/B髋部骨折患者,随访≥5年或直至死亡。结果测量和比较:研究包括四个阶段:(1)确定5年内第二次髋部骨折的相关因素;(2)采用多变量logistic回归建立预测5年髋部二次骨折(vs. FRAX)和死亡风险的模型;(3)利用约登指数(Youden's Index)建立“风险矩阵”,确定预防性固定的候选对象,该指数确定了每个风险方程的最大敏感性和特异性的截止点,并用于定义基于价值的目标群体;(4)高危/低死亡率患者标准护理与预防性护理的成本分析。结果:426例患者(平均年龄80.25岁,73.4%为女性)中,78例发生第二次髋部骨折(平均间隔594天)。预测因素包括较高的FRAX评分(p=0.004)、痴呆(p)。结论:开发了一种新的矩阵,可以准确预测5年第二次髋部骨折和死亡风险。对低死亡率、高风险患者进行预防性固定可以降低费用并预防未来的骨折。[可用工具:https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/].Level证据:三级诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Contralateral Second Hip Fracture Risk Within 5 Years of First Hip Fracture: A New Risk Tool to Guide Patient/Family Counseling and Bone Health Treatment.

Objective: To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients.

Methods: Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study.

Setting: Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital.

Patient selection criteria: Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a "risk matrix" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients.

Results: Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575).

Conclusions: A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/].

Level of evidence: Level III Diagnostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信