关于潜在的非有益重症监护病房治疗的决策:来自学术公立医院的家庭成员访谈。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jennifer Parrish, Thanh H Neville, Derjung M Tarn, Dong W Chang
{"title":"关于潜在的非有益重症监护病房治疗的决策:来自学术公立医院的家庭成员访谈。","authors":"Jennifer Parrish, Thanh H Neville, Derjung M Tarn, Dong W Chang","doi":"10.1177/08850666251371579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveDeveloping effective strategies to improve shared decision-making (SDM) about potentially non-beneficial intensive care unit (ICU) treatments for patients with advanced medical illness requires understanding patients' and family members' perspectives. This study explores family members' experiences in discussing potentially non-beneficial treatments with ICU clinicians to identify factors that influenced their decision-making.MethodsSemi-structured interviews of pre-dominantly non-White family members making decisions about potentially non-beneficial ICU treatments were conducted in the medical ICU of an academic public hospital in Los Angeles County. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEighteen surrogate decision-makers were interviewed for this study. Perceived barriers to decision-making included intimidation, dehumanizing family meetings, time-pressure to make decisions, and uncertainty of benefit from ICU treatments. Factors that affected the perceived susceptibility from harm or likelihood of benefit from invasive treatments included health status prior to hospitalization, physicians' discussion of prognoses, and direct observation of clinical status during ICU hospitalization. Greater self-efficacy in making decisions was promoted by stronger family support, gaining experience with the clinical situation, and empathic characteristics of the clinical team.ConclusionsInterviews with family members at a single ICU revealed that strategies to improve decision-making may include emphasizing empathic communication styles that focus on patients' values and preferences for care, reducing time-pressure and uncertainty by seeing the effects of ICU treatments, and creating time for families to adjust and seek social support. Adopting this approach may allow ICU clinicians and family members to become more aligned in their efforts to provide compassionate care for patients while minimizing non-beneficial treatments. These findings need to be validated in larger patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251371579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-Making About Potentially Non-Beneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Interviews of Family Members from an Academic Public Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Parrish, Thanh H Neville, Derjung M Tarn, Dong W Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666251371579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveDeveloping effective strategies to improve shared decision-making (SDM) about potentially non-beneficial intensive care unit (ICU) treatments for patients with advanced medical illness requires understanding patients' and family members' perspectives. This study explores family members' experiences in discussing potentially non-beneficial treatments with ICU clinicians to identify factors that influenced their decision-making.MethodsSemi-structured interviews of pre-dominantly non-White family members making decisions about potentially non-beneficial ICU treatments were conducted in the medical ICU of an academic public hospital in Los Angeles County. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEighteen surrogate decision-makers were interviewed for this study. Perceived barriers to decision-making included intimidation, dehumanizing family meetings, time-pressure to make decisions, and uncertainty of benefit from ICU treatments. Factors that affected the perceived susceptibility from harm or likelihood of benefit from invasive treatments included health status prior to hospitalization, physicians' discussion of prognoses, and direct observation of clinical status during ICU hospitalization. Greater self-efficacy in making decisions was promoted by stronger family support, gaining experience with the clinical situation, and empathic characteristics of the clinical team.ConclusionsInterviews with family members at a single ICU revealed that strategies to improve decision-making may include emphasizing empathic communication styles that focus on patients' values and preferences for care, reducing time-pressure and uncertainty by seeing the effects of ICU treatments, and creating time for families to adjust and seek social support. Adopting this approach may allow ICU clinicians and family members to become more aligned in their efforts to provide compassionate care for patients while minimizing non-beneficial treatments. These findings need to be validated in larger patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8850666251371579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251371579\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251371579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解患者和家属的观点,以制定有效的策略来改善对晚期重症监护病房(ICU)治疗可能不利的共同决策(SDM)。本研究探讨家庭成员与ICU临床医生讨论潜在的非有益治疗的经验,以确定影响他们决策的因素。方法采用半结构化访谈法,对洛杉矶县某公立学术医院内科重症监护室的非白人家庭成员进行可能无益处的ICU治疗决策。访谈录音,转录,并使用专题分析进行分析。结果本研究共访谈了18位代理决策者。人们认为决策障碍包括恐吓、家庭会议的非人性化、决策的时间压力以及ICU治疗获益的不确定性。影响有创治疗的伤害易感性或获益可能性的因素包括住院前的健康状况、医生对预后的讨论以及ICU住院期间对临床状况的直接观察。更强的家庭支持、对临床情况的经验和临床团队的共情特征促进了决策的自我效能。结论对单个ICU家庭成员的访谈显示,改善决策的策略可能包括强调关注患者价值观和护理偏好的共情沟通方式,通过观察ICU治疗效果来减少时间压力和不确定性,并为家庭创造时间来调整和寻求社会支持。采用这种方法可以使ICU临床医生和家庭成员在努力为患者提供富有同情心的护理时更加一致,同时尽量减少非有益的治疗。这些发现需要在更大的患者群体中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-Making About Potentially Non-Beneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Interviews of Family Members from an Academic Public Hospital.

ObjectiveDeveloping effective strategies to improve shared decision-making (SDM) about potentially non-beneficial intensive care unit (ICU) treatments for patients with advanced medical illness requires understanding patients' and family members' perspectives. This study explores family members' experiences in discussing potentially non-beneficial treatments with ICU clinicians to identify factors that influenced their decision-making.MethodsSemi-structured interviews of pre-dominantly non-White family members making decisions about potentially non-beneficial ICU treatments were conducted in the medical ICU of an academic public hospital in Los Angeles County. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsEighteen surrogate decision-makers were interviewed for this study. Perceived barriers to decision-making included intimidation, dehumanizing family meetings, time-pressure to make decisions, and uncertainty of benefit from ICU treatments. Factors that affected the perceived susceptibility from harm or likelihood of benefit from invasive treatments included health status prior to hospitalization, physicians' discussion of prognoses, and direct observation of clinical status during ICU hospitalization. Greater self-efficacy in making decisions was promoted by stronger family support, gaining experience with the clinical situation, and empathic characteristics of the clinical team.ConclusionsInterviews with family members at a single ICU revealed that strategies to improve decision-making may include emphasizing empathic communication styles that focus on patients' values and preferences for care, reducing time-pressure and uncertainty by seeing the effects of ICU treatments, and creating time for families to adjust and seek social support. Adopting this approach may allow ICU clinicians and family members to become more aligned in their efforts to provide compassionate care for patients while minimizing non-beneficial treatments. These findings need to be validated in larger patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信