Begoña Oronoz, Javier Suárez, Susana Oquiñena, Maria Concepción Llanos, Ana Borda, Enrique Balen
{"title":"局部切除后省略额外手术是否会影响高危pT1结直肠癌患者的肿瘤预后?","authors":"Begoña Oronoz, Javier Suárez, Susana Oquiñena, Maria Concepción Llanos, Ana Borda, Enrique Balen","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01298-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Spain, with pT1 adenocarcinomas often managed via endoscopic polypectomy (EP). Determining the necessity of additional surgery post-EP remains challenging, especially given the low incidence of intramural residual tumor (IRT) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in certain high-risk cases. This study aims to evaluate histological factors predicting residual disease and to explore strategies to reduce unnecessary completion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 276 patients with pT1 CRC arising from colonic and upper rectal polyps treated with complete EP at our institution between 2013 and 2021. pT1-polyps with positive resection margins, deep submucosal invasion ≥ 2 mm, presence of lymphovascular invasion, high-grade tumor budding, unfavorable histology, or indeterminate polyps were considered high-risk pT1-polyps. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), high-risk endoscopic management (HR-E), and high-risk surgical management (HR-S) groups. Follow-up involved clinical, endoscopic, and imaging surveillance over a median of 70 months. IRT, LNM, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 276 patients, 88 (32%) were low-risk managed endoscopically, while 188 (68%) exhibited high-risk features; 128 underwent surgery (HR-S), and 60 were managed with surveillance (HR-E). Residual disease was identified in 18.7% of surgical specimens. IRT was predominantly associated with positive margins (p = 0.01). Unfavorable histology was strongly linked to LNM (p = 0.000). Recurrence rates were similar between HR-E and HR-S groups in patients with a single risk factor, with local recurrences effectively managed surgically. No CRC-specific deaths occurred in the HR-E group, and overall survival was better among patients with lower ASA scores and favorable histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive resection margins and unfavorable histology are significant predictors of IRT and LNM in pT1 CRC. Careful patient selection and vigilant follow-up may allow safe deferral of completion surgery in selected high-risk patients, especially those with comorbidities or a single histological risk factor, thereby reducing surgical morbidity without compromising survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Resection Affect Oncological Outcomes in Patients with High-Risk pT1 Colorectal Cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Begoña Oronoz, Javier Suárez, Susana Oquiñena, Maria Concepción Llanos, Ana Borda, Enrique Balen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-025-01298-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Spain, with pT1 adenocarcinomas often managed via endoscopic polypectomy (EP). Determining the necessity of additional surgery post-EP remains challenging, especially given the low incidence of intramural residual tumor (IRT) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in certain high-risk cases. This study aims to evaluate histological factors predicting residual disease and to explore strategies to reduce unnecessary completion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 276 patients with pT1 CRC arising from colonic and upper rectal polyps treated with complete EP at our institution between 2013 and 2021. pT1-polyps with positive resection margins, deep submucosal invasion ≥ 2 mm, presence of lymphovascular invasion, high-grade tumor budding, unfavorable histology, or indeterminate polyps were considered high-risk pT1-polyps. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), high-risk endoscopic management (HR-E), and high-risk surgical management (HR-S) groups. Follow-up involved clinical, endoscopic, and imaging surveillance over a median of 70 months. IRT, LNM, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 276 patients, 88 (32%) were low-risk managed endoscopically, while 188 (68%) exhibited high-risk features; 128 underwent surgery (HR-S), and 60 were managed with surveillance (HR-E). Residual disease was identified in 18.7% of surgical specimens. IRT was predominantly associated with positive margins (p = 0.01). Unfavorable histology was strongly linked to LNM (p = 0.000). Recurrence rates were similar between HR-E and HR-S groups in patients with a single risk factor, with local recurrences effectively managed surgically. No CRC-specific deaths occurred in the HR-E group, and overall survival was better among patients with lower ASA scores and favorable histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive resection margins and unfavorable histology are significant predictors of IRT and LNM in pT1 CRC. Careful patient selection and vigilant follow-up may allow safe deferral of completion surgery in selected high-risk patients, especially those with comorbidities or a single histological risk factor, thereby reducing surgical morbidity without compromising survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01298-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01298-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Resection Affect Oncological Outcomes in Patients with High-Risk pT1 Colorectal Cancer?
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Spain, with pT1 adenocarcinomas often managed via endoscopic polypectomy (EP). Determining the necessity of additional surgery post-EP remains challenging, especially given the low incidence of intramural residual tumor (IRT) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in certain high-risk cases. This study aims to evaluate histological factors predicting residual disease and to explore strategies to reduce unnecessary completion surgeries.
Methods: We analyzed data from 276 patients with pT1 CRC arising from colonic and upper rectal polyps treated with complete EP at our institution between 2013 and 2021. pT1-polyps with positive resection margins, deep submucosal invasion ≥ 2 mm, presence of lymphovascular invasion, high-grade tumor budding, unfavorable histology, or indeterminate polyps were considered high-risk pT1-polyps. Patients were stratified into low-risk (LR), high-risk endoscopic management (HR-E), and high-risk surgical management (HR-S) groups. Follow-up involved clinical, endoscopic, and imaging surveillance over a median of 70 months. IRT, LNM, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Of the 276 patients, 88 (32%) were low-risk managed endoscopically, while 188 (68%) exhibited high-risk features; 128 underwent surgery (HR-S), and 60 were managed with surveillance (HR-E). Residual disease was identified in 18.7% of surgical specimens. IRT was predominantly associated with positive margins (p = 0.01). Unfavorable histology was strongly linked to LNM (p = 0.000). Recurrence rates were similar between HR-E and HR-S groups in patients with a single risk factor, with local recurrences effectively managed surgically. No CRC-specific deaths occurred in the HR-E group, and overall survival was better among patients with lower ASA scores and favorable histology.
Conclusion: Positive resection margins and unfavorable histology are significant predictors of IRT and LNM in pT1 CRC. Careful patient selection and vigilant follow-up may allow safe deferral of completion surgery in selected high-risk patients, especially those with comorbidities or a single histological risk factor, thereby reducing surgical morbidity without compromising survival.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.