全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染后15年死亡率:一项8,642例感染修正的登记研究。

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicolai K Kristensen, Jeppe Lange, Richard de Steiger, Michelle Lorimer, Dylan Harries, Ian A Harris, Laurens Manning, Peter Lewis, David Campbell
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染后15年死亡率:一项8,642例感染修正的登记研究。","authors":"Nicolai K Kristensen, Jeppe Lange, Richard de Steiger, Michelle Lorimer, Dylan Harries, Ian A Harris, Laurens Manning, Peter Lewis, David Campbell","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication associated with notable loss of function, impaired quality of life, and excess short-term mortality. In this study, we aimed to report the impact of PJI on long-term mortality and its associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on Australian period life tables to describe mortality rates following revision for PJI, aseptic revisions (excluding those for fracture), and unrevised primary TKA. Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with multivariable proportional hazard models to assess the impact of the risk factors of age, gender, comorbidities, and minor versus major revisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 867,113 TKA procedures overall, there were 8,642 first revisions for PJI and 25,328 aseptic first revisions. At 5, 10, and 15 years, 16.1%, 34.4%, and 53.4% of patients with revision for PJI had died. When compared with a matched population, the SMR for revision for PJI was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 1.39); for aseptic revision, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.87); and for unrevised primary TKA, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.79). Increasing age and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were significant mortality risk factors. Major revisions for PJI were not associated with a greater mortality risk compared with minor revisions for PJI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with revision for PJI had a 33% greater-than-expected mortality. There was a high mortality in the early postoperative period, and the excess mortality risk persisted beyond 15 years. Increasing age and higher ASA scores were associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifteen-Year Mortality Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Registry Study of 8,642 Revisions for Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolai K Kristensen, Jeppe Lange, Richard de Steiger, Michelle Lorimer, Dylan Harries, Ian A Harris, Laurens Manning, Peter Lewis, David Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.01630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication associated with notable loss of function, impaired quality of life, and excess short-term mortality. In this study, we aimed to report the impact of PJI on long-term mortality and its associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on Australian period life tables to describe mortality rates following revision for PJI, aseptic revisions (excluding those for fracture), and unrevised primary TKA. Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with multivariable proportional hazard models to assess the impact of the risk factors of age, gender, comorbidities, and minor versus major revisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 867,113 TKA procedures overall, there were 8,642 first revisions for PJI and 25,328 aseptic first revisions. At 5, 10, and 15 years, 16.1%, 34.4%, and 53.4% of patients with revision for PJI had died. When compared with a matched population, the SMR for revision for PJI was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 1.39); for aseptic revision, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.87); and for unrevised primary TKA, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.79). Increasing age and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were significant mortality risk factors. Major revisions for PJI were not associated with a greater mortality risk compared with minor revisions for PJI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with revision for PJI had a 33% greater-than-expected mortality. There was a high mortality in the early postoperative period, and the excess mortality risk persisted beyond 15 years. Increasing age and higher ASA scores were associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01630\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后假体周围关节感染(PJI)是一种严重的并发症,与显著的功能丧失、生活质量受损和短期死亡率过高相关。在本研究中,我们旨在报告PJI对长期死亡率及其相关危险因素的影响。方法:使用来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)的数据,我们基于澳大利亚周期生命表使用Kaplan-Meier估计生存率和标准化死亡率(SMRs)来描述PJI修订、无菌修订(不包括骨折)和未修订的原发性TKA后的死亡率。此外,使用多变量比例风险模型计算风险比(hr),以评估年龄、性别、合并症、小修订与大修订等风险因素的影响。结果:在867,113个TKA程序中,有8,642个PJI首次修订,25,328个无菌首次修订。在5、10和15年时,16.1%、34.4%和53.4%的PJI改良患者死亡。与匹配人群相比,PJI修订的SMR为1.33(95%可信区间[CI]: 1.28至1.39);无菌修订为0.84 (95% CI: 0.82 ~ 0.87);未修正的主要TKA为0.79 (95% CI: 0.78 ~ 0.79)。年龄增长和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分升高是显著的死亡危险因素。与PJI的小修订相比,PJI的大修订与更高的死亡风险无关。结论:PJI改良患者的死亡率比预期高33%。术后早期死亡率高,超过15年的死亡风险持续存在。年龄的增加和ASA评分的升高与死亡率的增加有关。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fifteen-Year Mortality Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Registry Study of 8,642 Revisions for Infection.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication associated with notable loss of function, impaired quality of life, and excess short-term mortality. In this study, we aimed to report the impact of PJI on long-term mortality and its associated risk factors.

Methods: Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on Australian period life tables to describe mortality rates following revision for PJI, aseptic revisions (excluding those for fracture), and unrevised primary TKA. Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with multivariable proportional hazard models to assess the impact of the risk factors of age, gender, comorbidities, and minor versus major revisions.

Results: Among 867,113 TKA procedures overall, there were 8,642 first revisions for PJI and 25,328 aseptic first revisions. At 5, 10, and 15 years, 16.1%, 34.4%, and 53.4% of patients with revision for PJI had died. When compared with a matched population, the SMR for revision for PJI was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 1.39); for aseptic revision, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.87); and for unrevised primary TKA, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.79). Increasing age and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were significant mortality risk factors. Major revisions for PJI were not associated with a greater mortality risk compared with minor revisions for PJI.

Conclusions: Patients with revision for PJI had a 33% greater-than-expected mortality. There was a high mortality in the early postoperative period, and the excess mortality risk persisted beyond 15 years. Increasing age and higher ASA scores were associated with increased mortality.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信