遗传毒理学中染色体畸变检测溶剂安全性评价。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Satyam N Patel, Chetan K Kajavadara, Rushikesh M Shukla, Darshan T Valani, Laxit K Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R Jain
{"title":"遗传毒理学中染色体畸变检测溶剂安全性评价。","authors":"Satyam N Patel, Chetan K Kajavadara, Rushikesh M Shukla, Darshan T Valani, Laxit K Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R Jain","doi":"10.1002/jat.4894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The chromosome aberration test (CAT) is a widely used in vitro assay for detecting structural chromosomal damage induced by clastogenic chemicals. It plays a crucial role in genetic toxicology, helping assess the potential genotoxic effects of pharmaceutical compounds, environmental contaminants, and industrial chemicals. This test is particularly valuable in regulatory studies, as chromosomal aberrations are linked to mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and hereditary diseases. The test evaluates their occurrence in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) or other mammalian cells after exposure to test chemicals. Accurate solubility of test compounds is critical for determining the highest feasible concentration in CAT without compromising cell viability or assay integrity. However, selecting an appropriate solvent remains a challenge in genetic toxicology, as the solvent must ensure chemical stability, support cell growth and metabolic activation, comprise ≤ 1% of the final treatment medium, and be compatible with human blood cells. In this study, we systematically evaluated the cytotoxic effects of various solvents on HPBL at 0.5% and 1% concentrations over a 22-h exposure period, replicating approximately 1.5 normal cell cycle durations without the inclusion of a metabolic activation system. The solvents tested included dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, p-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dimethylacetamide. Our findings revealed that N,N-dimethylformamide and acetone were noncytotoxic at 0.5%, while ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide were noncytotoxic at both 0.5% and 1% concentrations, whereas other solvents exhibited cytotoxic effects at both concentrations. These findings provide valuable insights for genetic toxicologists, enabling better selection of optimal solvents for CAT-based genotoxicity assessments. By refining solvent choices, researchers can improve chromosome aberration analysis accuracy, facilitating more reliable regulatory decision-making in genetic toxicology and pharmaceutical safety evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Solvent Safety in Chromosome Aberration Assays for Genetic Toxicology.\",\"authors\":\"Satyam N Patel, Chetan K Kajavadara, Rushikesh M Shukla, Darshan T Valani, Laxit K Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jat.4894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The chromosome aberration test (CAT) is a widely used in vitro assay for detecting structural chromosomal damage induced by clastogenic chemicals. It plays a crucial role in genetic toxicology, helping assess the potential genotoxic effects of pharmaceutical compounds, environmental contaminants, and industrial chemicals. This test is particularly valuable in regulatory studies, as chromosomal aberrations are linked to mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and hereditary diseases. The test evaluates their occurrence in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) or other mammalian cells after exposure to test chemicals. Accurate solubility of test compounds is critical for determining the highest feasible concentration in CAT without compromising cell viability or assay integrity. However, selecting an appropriate solvent remains a challenge in genetic toxicology, as the solvent must ensure chemical stability, support cell growth and metabolic activation, comprise ≤ 1% of the final treatment medium, and be compatible with human blood cells. In this study, we systematically evaluated the cytotoxic effects of various solvents on HPBL at 0.5% and 1% concentrations over a 22-h exposure period, replicating approximately 1.5 normal cell cycle durations without the inclusion of a metabolic activation system. The solvents tested included dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, p-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dimethylacetamide. Our findings revealed that N,N-dimethylformamide and acetone were noncytotoxic at 0.5%, while ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide were noncytotoxic at both 0.5% and 1% concentrations, whereas other solvents exhibited cytotoxic effects at both concentrations. These findings provide valuable insights for genetic toxicologists, enabling better selection of optimal solvents for CAT-based genotoxicity assessments. By refining solvent choices, researchers can improve chromosome aberration analysis accuracy, facilitating more reliable regulatory decision-making in genetic toxicology and pharmaceutical safety evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4894\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

染色体畸变试验(CAT)是一种广泛应用于检测致裂性化学物质引起的染色体结构损伤的体外检测方法。它在遗传毒理学中起着至关重要的作用,有助于评估药物化合物、环境污染物和工业化学品的潜在遗传毒性作用。由于染色体畸变与致突变性、致癌性和遗传性疾病有关,该检测在调控研究中特别有价值。该试验评估暴露于试验化学物质后,它们在培养的人外周血淋巴细胞(HPBL)或其他哺乳动物细胞中的发生情况。测试化合物的准确溶解度对于在不影响细胞活力或测定完整性的情况下确定CAT的最高可行浓度至关重要。然而,在遗传毒理学中,选择合适的溶剂仍然是一个挑战,因为溶剂必须确保化学稳定性,支持细胞生长和代谢激活,占最终处理介质的≤1%,并且与人类血细胞兼容。在这项研究中,我们系统地评估了不同溶剂在0.5%和1%浓度下对HPBL的细胞毒性作用,在22小时的暴露期内,在不包含代谢激活系统的情况下复制了大约1.5个正常细胞周期。测试溶剂包括二甲亚砜(DMSO)、N,N-二甲基甲酰胺(DMF)、丙酮、乙腈、乙酸乙酯、乙醇、甲醇、对二氧六烷、四氢呋喃(THF)和二甲基乙酰胺。我们的研究结果表明,N、N-二甲基甲酰胺和丙酮在0.5%浓度下无细胞毒性,而乙醇、甲醇、乙腈和二甲亚砜在0.5%和1%浓度下均无细胞毒性,而其他溶剂在两种浓度下均表现出细胞毒性。这些发现为遗传毒理学家提供了有价值的见解,使基于cat的遗传毒性评估能够更好地选择最佳溶剂。通过改进溶剂的选择,研究人员可以提高染色体畸变分析的准确性,促进遗传毒理学和药物安全性评估中更可靠的监管决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Solvent Safety in Chromosome Aberration Assays for Genetic Toxicology.

The chromosome aberration test (CAT) is a widely used in vitro assay for detecting structural chromosomal damage induced by clastogenic chemicals. It plays a crucial role in genetic toxicology, helping assess the potential genotoxic effects of pharmaceutical compounds, environmental contaminants, and industrial chemicals. This test is particularly valuable in regulatory studies, as chromosomal aberrations are linked to mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and hereditary diseases. The test evaluates their occurrence in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) or other mammalian cells after exposure to test chemicals. Accurate solubility of test compounds is critical for determining the highest feasible concentration in CAT without compromising cell viability or assay integrity. However, selecting an appropriate solvent remains a challenge in genetic toxicology, as the solvent must ensure chemical stability, support cell growth and metabolic activation, comprise ≤ 1% of the final treatment medium, and be compatible with human blood cells. In this study, we systematically evaluated the cytotoxic effects of various solvents on HPBL at 0.5% and 1% concentrations over a 22-h exposure period, replicating approximately 1.5 normal cell cycle durations without the inclusion of a metabolic activation system. The solvents tested included dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, p-dioxane, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and dimethylacetamide. Our findings revealed that N,N-dimethylformamide and acetone were noncytotoxic at 0.5%, while ethanol, methanol, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide were noncytotoxic at both 0.5% and 1% concentrations, whereas other solvents exhibited cytotoxic effects at both concentrations. These findings provide valuable insights for genetic toxicologists, enabling better selection of optimal solvents for CAT-based genotoxicity assessments. By refining solvent choices, researchers can improve chromosome aberration analysis accuracy, facilitating more reliable regulatory decision-making in genetic toxicology and pharmaceutical safety evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信