Wen-wai Yim , Asma Ben Abacha , Robert Doerning , Chia-Yu Chen , Jiaying Xu , Anita Subbarao , Zixuan Yu , Fei Xia , M. Kennedy Hall , Meliha Yetisgen
{"title":"WoundcareVQA:伤口护理的多语言视觉问答基准数据集。","authors":"Wen-wai Yim , Asma Ben Abacha , Robert Doerning , Chia-Yu Chen , Jiaying Xu , Anita Subbarao , Zixuan Yu , Fei Xia , M. Kennedy Hall , Meliha Yetisgen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Introduce the task of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering, provide baseline performances, and identify areas of future study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A dataset of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering (VQA) was created using consumer health questions asked online. Practicing US medical doctors were tasked with providing metadata and expert responses labels. Several instruct-enabled, multilingual visual question answering models (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Qwen-VL) were tested to benchmark performances. Finally, automatic evaluations were tested against domain expert response ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>A multilingual dataset of 477 wound care cases, 768 responses, 748 images, 3k structured data labels, 1362 translation instances, and 10k judgments was constructed (<span><span>https://osf.io/xsj5u/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). Metadata scores ranged from 0.32–0.78 accuracy depending on classification type; response generation performances 0.06 BLEU, 0.66 BERTScore, 0.45 ROUGE-L in English and 0.12 BLEU, 0.69 BERTScore, and 0.50 ROUGE-L in Chinese.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>We construct and explore the tasks of multimodal, multilingual VQA. We hope the work here can inspire further research in wound care metadata classification, VQA response generation, and open response automatic evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104888"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WoundcareVQA: A multilingual visual question answering benchmark dataset for wound care\",\"authors\":\"Wen-wai Yim , Asma Ben Abacha , Robert Doerning , Chia-Yu Chen , Jiaying Xu , Anita Subbarao , Zixuan Yu , Fei Xia , M. Kennedy Hall , Meliha Yetisgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Introduce the task of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering, provide baseline performances, and identify areas of future study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A dataset of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering (VQA) was created using consumer health questions asked online. Practicing US medical doctors were tasked with providing metadata and expert responses labels. Several instruct-enabled, multilingual visual question answering models (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Qwen-VL) were tested to benchmark performances. Finally, automatic evaluations were tested against domain expert response ratings.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>A multilingual dataset of 477 wound care cases, 768 responses, 748 images, 3k structured data labels, 1362 translation instances, and 10k judgments was constructed (<span><span>https://osf.io/xsj5u/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). Metadata scores ranged from 0.32–0.78 accuracy depending on classification type; response generation performances 0.06 BLEU, 0.66 BERTScore, 0.45 ROUGE-L in English and 0.12 BLEU, 0.69 BERTScore, and 0.50 ROUGE-L in Chinese.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>We construct and explore the tasks of multimodal, multilingual VQA. We hope the work here can inspire further research in wound care metadata classification, VQA response generation, and open response automatic evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001170\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
WoundcareVQA: A multilingual visual question answering benchmark dataset for wound care
Objective:
Introduce the task of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering, provide baseline performances, and identify areas of future study.
Methods:
A dataset of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering (VQA) was created using consumer health questions asked online. Practicing US medical doctors were tasked with providing metadata and expert responses labels. Several instruct-enabled, multilingual visual question answering models (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Qwen-VL) were tested to benchmark performances. Finally, automatic evaluations were tested against domain expert response ratings.
Results:
A multilingual dataset of 477 wound care cases, 768 responses, 748 images, 3k structured data labels, 1362 translation instances, and 10k judgments was constructed (https://osf.io/xsj5u/). Metadata scores ranged from 0.32–0.78 accuracy depending on classification type; response generation performances 0.06 BLEU, 0.66 BERTScore, 0.45 ROUGE-L in English and 0.12 BLEU, 0.69 BERTScore, and 0.50 ROUGE-L in Chinese.
Conclusion:
We construct and explore the tasks of multimodal, multilingual VQA. We hope the work here can inspire further research in wound care metadata classification, VQA response generation, and open response automatic evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.