非劣效性研究在骨科手术中的作用:确定结果是否相同,不差,或只是没有区别。

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
W Garret Burks, Youngjae Lee, Kelly Gordon, Alison N Tegge, Peter J Apel
{"title":"非劣效性研究在骨科手术中的作用:确定结果是否相同,不差,或只是没有区别。","authors":"W Garret Burks, Youngjae Lee, Kelly Gordon, Alison N Tegge, Peter J Apel","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.01333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>➢ With any study, readers should be cautious and critical when the conclusion is that \"these treatments are the same.\"➢ If only superiority testing was performed, failing to find a difference does not mean that the treatments are the same, even when the study was adequately powered.➢ Noninferiority analysis is the correct method to compare treatments that researchers and clinicians think may be \"the same\" for the primary outcome.➢ The most important aspect of a noninferiority analysis is the selection of the noninferiority margin, which is the minimum difference between groups that would be considered meaningful.➢ To perform noninferiority testing, the difference in an outcome measure of interest between experimental and control groups must be examined with respect to the noninferiority margin of the same outcome measure. Assuming that a greater value indicates improvement in an outcome measure, if the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval of a difference in means based on a 1-sided test is greater than the noninferiority margin, then the experimental treatment can be considered noninferior to the control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"2208-2215"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Noninferiority Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery: Determining Whether Outcomes Are the Same, No Worse, or Simply Not Different.\",\"authors\":\"W Garret Burks, Youngjae Lee, Kelly Gordon, Alison N Tegge, Peter J Apel\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.01333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>➢ With any study, readers should be cautious and critical when the conclusion is that \\\"these treatments are the same.\\\"➢ If only superiority testing was performed, failing to find a difference does not mean that the treatments are the same, even when the study was adequately powered.➢ Noninferiority analysis is the correct method to compare treatments that researchers and clinicians think may be \\\"the same\\\" for the primary outcome.➢ The most important aspect of a noninferiority analysis is the selection of the noninferiority margin, which is the minimum difference between groups that would be considered meaningful.➢ To perform noninferiority testing, the difference in an outcome measure of interest between experimental and control groups must be examined with respect to the noninferiority margin of the same outcome measure. Assuming that a greater value indicates improvement in an outcome measure, if the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval of a difference in means based on a 1-sided test is greater than the noninferiority margin, then the experimental treatment can be considered noninferior to the control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2208-2215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01333\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.01333","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(五)对于任何一项研究,如果得出“这些治疗方法相同”的结论,读者都应该保持谨慎和批判的态度。(四)如果只进行了优越性测试,即使研究有足够的动力,但未能发现差异并不意味着处理是相同的。非劣效性分析是对研究人员和临床医生认为可能“相同”的主要结果进行比较的正确方法。非劣效性分析最重要的方面是选择非劣效性边际,即被认为有意义的群体之间的最小差异。(四)为进行非劣效性测试,实验组和对照组之间感兴趣的结果测量值的差异必须相对于同一结果测量值的非劣效性裕度进行检查。假设更大的值表明结果测量的改善,如果基于单侧检验的均值差异的95%置信区间的下界大于非劣效性边际,则可以认为实验治疗优于对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Noninferiority Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery: Determining Whether Outcomes Are the Same, No Worse, or Simply Not Different.

➢ With any study, readers should be cautious and critical when the conclusion is that "these treatments are the same."➢ If only superiority testing was performed, failing to find a difference does not mean that the treatments are the same, even when the study was adequately powered.➢ Noninferiority analysis is the correct method to compare treatments that researchers and clinicians think may be "the same" for the primary outcome.➢ The most important aspect of a noninferiority analysis is the selection of the noninferiority margin, which is the minimum difference between groups that would be considered meaningful.➢ To perform noninferiority testing, the difference in an outcome measure of interest between experimental and control groups must be examined with respect to the noninferiority margin of the same outcome measure. Assuming that a greater value indicates improvement in an outcome measure, if the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval of a difference in means based on a 1-sided test is greater than the noninferiority margin, then the experimental treatment can be considered noninferior to the control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信