Ying Jin, Ying Shan, Wen Guo, Yu Dong, Yan Li, Wei Wang, Jie Yin, Yiming Liang, Yu Gu, Lingya Pan, Han Liang
{"title":"IIIC期和IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗CDKL3的治疗结果和生物标志物潜力","authors":"Ying Jin, Ying Shan, Wen Guo, Yu Dong, Yan Li, Wei Wang, Jie Yin, Yiming Liang, Yu Gu, Lingya Pan, Han Liang","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies. Although treatment options for newly diagnosed advanced EOC include primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), the comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain across different disease stages.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 297 patients with EOC whose initial treatment strategy was guided by predicted primary resectability using the Suidan model. We assessed their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival outcomes stratified by FIGO stage and treatment approach (PDS <i>v</i> NACT-IDS). We also explored molecular markers associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed that patients with stage IIIC EOC had improved survival outcomes with PDS, whereas those with stage IV disease benefited more from NACT-IDS. Furthermore, CDKL3 was identified as a gene associated with poor prognosis and platinum resistance, potentially contributing to the observed differential survival patterns across stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that FIGO stage provides additional value in guiding the selection of patients with EOC who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CDKL3 may serve as a promising biomarker for treatment stratification and a therapeutic target to overcome chemoresistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400505"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Outcomes and Biomarker Potential of <i>CDKL3</i> of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIC Versus Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Jin, Ying Shan, Wen Guo, Yu Dong, Yan Li, Wei Wang, Jie Yin, Yiming Liang, Yu Gu, Lingya Pan, Han Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-24-00505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies. Although treatment options for newly diagnosed advanced EOC include primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), the comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain across different disease stages.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 297 patients with EOC whose initial treatment strategy was guided by predicted primary resectability using the Suidan model. We assessed their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival outcomes stratified by FIGO stage and treatment approach (PDS <i>v</i> NACT-IDS). We also explored molecular markers associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed that patients with stage IIIC EOC had improved survival outcomes with PDS, whereas those with stage IV disease benefited more from NACT-IDS. Furthermore, CDKL3 was identified as a gene associated with poor prognosis and platinum resistance, potentially contributing to the observed differential survival patterns across stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that FIGO stage provides additional value in guiding the selection of patients with EOC who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CDKL3 may serve as a promising biomarker for treatment stratification and a therapeutic target to overcome chemoresistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)仍然是最致命的妇科恶性肿瘤之一。虽然新诊断的晚期EOC的治疗选择包括原发性减体积手术(PDS)或新辅助化疗(NACT),然后进行间隔减体积手术(IDS),但这些策略在不同疾病阶段的比较有效性仍不确定。材料和方法:我们对297例EOC患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者的初始治疗策略是使用Suidan模型预测原发性可切除性。我们根据FIGO分期和治疗方法(PDS vs NACT-IDS)对患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期进行了评估。我们还探讨了与预后和化疗反应相关的分子标记。结果:我们的分析显示,IIIC期EOC患者的PDS生存结果得到改善,而那些IV期EOC患者从NACT-IDS中获益更多。此外,CDKL3被确定为与预后不良和铂耐药相关的基因,可能导致观察到的不同阶段的生存模式差异。结论:FIGO分期为指导选择可能受益于新辅助化疗的EOC患者提供了额外的价值。CDKL3可能作为治疗分层的有希望的生物标志物和克服化疗耐药的治疗靶点。
Therapeutic Outcomes and Biomarker Potential of CDKL3 of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage IIIC Versus Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Purpose: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies. Although treatment options for newly diagnosed advanced EOC include primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), the comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain across different disease stages.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 297 patients with EOC whose initial treatment strategy was guided by predicted primary resectability using the Suidan model. We assessed their progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival outcomes stratified by FIGO stage and treatment approach (PDS v NACT-IDS). We also explored molecular markers associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response.
Results: Our analysis revealed that patients with stage IIIC EOC had improved survival outcomes with PDS, whereas those with stage IV disease benefited more from NACT-IDS. Furthermore, CDKL3 was identified as a gene associated with poor prognosis and platinum resistance, potentially contributing to the observed differential survival patterns across stages.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that FIGO stage provides additional value in guiding the selection of patients with EOC who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CDKL3 may serve as a promising biomarker for treatment stratification and a therapeutic target to overcome chemoresistance.