在超过95万人的队列中,RPS20功能丧失变异与结直肠癌风险的关联

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00214
Jennifer Herrera-Mullar, Cassidy Carraway, Ashley P L Marsh, Felicia Hernandez, Emily Kudalkar, Marcy E Richardson
{"title":"在超过95万人的队列中,RPS20功能丧失变异与结直肠癌风险的关联","authors":"Jennifer Herrera-Mullar, Cassidy Carraway, Ashley P L Marsh, Felicia Hernandez, Emily Kudalkar, Marcy E Richardson","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>RPS20</i> is a proposed colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition gene, with only four families with putative loss-of-function (pLoF) variants published. The prevalence, phenotypic spectrum, and clinical management recommendations for <i>RPS20</i> heterozygotes remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of approximately 950,000 individuals undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) for cancer predisposition identified 36 individuals with pLoF variants in <i>RPS20</i>. Clinical features, tumor prevalence, and age at onset were compared with Lynch syndrome (LS) and wild-type (WT) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six individuals (0.004%) had 28 unique pLoF variants in <i>RPS20</i> and a total of 42 primary tumors, 78.6% of which were CRC with a median age of diagnosis of 50 years. A total of 16.7% of individuals had multiple CRC primaries, and a majority (71.4%) were mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR). Signet ring cell (SRC) pathology was significantly enriched compared with WT (<i>P</i> = <.0001). The odds ratio for CRC was significantly higher than that for the <i>MLH1</i>-related LS cohort (odds ratio [OR], 45.3 [95% CI, 21.3 to 101] and OR, 16.9 [95% CI, 14.9 to 19.2], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>RPS20</i> is associated with early-onset, pMMR CRC enriched for SRC pathology. Comparison of prevalence showed a statistically significant two-fold increase in the odds of developing CRC compared with an <i>MLH1</i> LS cohort. These data confirm the gene-disease relationship between <i>RPS20</i> and CRC and support clinical management guidelines similar to <i>MLH1</i>-related LS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500214"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of <i>RPS20</i> Loss-of-Function Variants With Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Cohort of Over 950,000 Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Herrera-Mullar, Cassidy Carraway, Ashley P L Marsh, Felicia Hernandez, Emily Kudalkar, Marcy E Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-25-00214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>RPS20</i> is a proposed colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition gene, with only four families with putative loss-of-function (pLoF) variants published. The prevalence, phenotypic spectrum, and clinical management recommendations for <i>RPS20</i> heterozygotes remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of approximately 950,000 individuals undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) for cancer predisposition identified 36 individuals with pLoF variants in <i>RPS20</i>. Clinical features, tumor prevalence, and age at onset were compared with Lynch syndrome (LS) and wild-type (WT) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six individuals (0.004%) had 28 unique pLoF variants in <i>RPS20</i> and a total of 42 primary tumors, 78.6% of which were CRC with a median age of diagnosis of 50 years. A total of 16.7% of individuals had multiple CRC primaries, and a majority (71.4%) were mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR). Signet ring cell (SRC) pathology was significantly enriched compared with WT (<i>P</i> = <.0001). The odds ratio for CRC was significantly higher than that for the <i>MLH1</i>-related LS cohort (odds ratio [OR], 45.3 [95% CI, 21.3 to 101] and OR, 16.9 [95% CI, 14.9 to 19.2], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>RPS20</i> is associated with early-onset, pMMR CRC enriched for SRC pathology. Comparison of prevalence showed a statistically significant two-fold increase in the odds of developing CRC compared with an <i>MLH1</i> LS cohort. These data confirm the gene-disease relationship between <i>RPS20</i> and CRC and support clinical management guidelines similar to <i>MLH1</i>-related LS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406993/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:RPS20是一种被提出的结直肠癌(CRC)易感基因,仅报道了四个具有推测功能丧失(pLoF)变异的家族。RPS20杂合子的患病率、表型谱和临床管理建议仍然未知。方法:对大约95万名接受多基因面板检测(MGPT)的癌症易感性的个体进行回顾性分析,确定了36名RPS20中pLoF变异的个体。比较Lynch综合征(LS)组和野生型(WT)组的临床特征、肿瘤患病率和发病年龄。结果:36例(0.004%)患者在RPS20中有28个独特的pLoF变异,共42例原发肿瘤,其中78.6%为结直肠癌,中位诊断年龄为50岁。共有16.7%的个体有多个CRC原发,大多数(71.4%)是错配修复熟练(pMMR)。与WT相比,印环细胞(SRC)病理显著增强(P = mlh1相关LS队列)(比值比[OR]分别为45.3 [95% CI, 21.3 ~ 101]和16.9 [95% CI, 14.9 ~ 19.2])。结论:RPS20与SRC病理富集的早发性pMMR CRC相关。患病率比较显示,与MLH1 LS队列相比,发生CRC的几率有统计学意义的两倍增加。这些数据证实了RPS20与CRC之间的基因-疾病关系,并支持类似于mlh1相关LS的临床管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of <i>RPS20</i> Loss-of-Function Variants With Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Cohort of Over 950,000 Individuals.

Association of RPS20 Loss-of-Function Variants With Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Cohort of Over 950,000 Individuals.

Purpose: RPS20 is a proposed colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition gene, with only four families with putative loss-of-function (pLoF) variants published. The prevalence, phenotypic spectrum, and clinical management recommendations for RPS20 heterozygotes remain unknown.

Methods: Retrospective review of approximately 950,000 individuals undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) for cancer predisposition identified 36 individuals with pLoF variants in RPS20. Clinical features, tumor prevalence, and age at onset were compared with Lynch syndrome (LS) and wild-type (WT) cohorts.

Results: Thirty-six individuals (0.004%) had 28 unique pLoF variants in RPS20 and a total of 42 primary tumors, 78.6% of which were CRC with a median age of diagnosis of 50 years. A total of 16.7% of individuals had multiple CRC primaries, and a majority (71.4%) were mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR). Signet ring cell (SRC) pathology was significantly enriched compared with WT (P = <.0001). The odds ratio for CRC was significantly higher than that for the MLH1-related LS cohort (odds ratio [OR], 45.3 [95% CI, 21.3 to 101] and OR, 16.9 [95% CI, 14.9 to 19.2], respectively).

Conclusion: RPS20 is associated with early-onset, pMMR CRC enriched for SRC pathology. Comparison of prevalence showed a statistically significant two-fold increase in the odds of developing CRC compared with an MLH1 LS cohort. These data confirm the gene-disease relationship between RPS20 and CRC and support clinical management guidelines similar to MLH1-related LS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信