新型硅基材料分解图像诊断胰腺导管腺癌:与碘基和50 kev虚拟单能图像的比较。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Yoshifumi Noda, Mayu Hattori, Nobuyuki Kawai, Tetsuro Kaga, Akio Ito, Takuma Ishihara, Toshiharu Miyoshi, Yukiko Takai, Masashi Asano, Hiroki Kato, Fuminori Hyodo, Avinash R Kambadakone, Masayuki Matsuo
{"title":"新型硅基材料分解图像诊断胰腺导管腺癌:与碘基和50 kev虚拟单能图像的比较。","authors":"Yoshifumi Noda, Mayu Hattori, Nobuyuki Kawai, Tetsuro Kaga, Akio Ito, Takuma Ishihara, Toshiharu Miyoshi, Yukiko Takai, Masashi Asano, Hiroki Kato, Fuminori Hyodo, Avinash R Kambadakone, Masayuki Matsuo","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01856-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the optimal material decomposition (MD) images for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and evaluate the added value of the MD image to 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) by comparing with iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatic protocol dual-energy CT (DECT) between February 2019 and May 2023. First, a radiologist evaluated 702 image datasets generated using 27 different materials to identify the top three MD images which provided maximum contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC, and subsequently, the best MD image was selected based on z value and image quality by four radiologists. Then, another four radiologists independently interpreted the conventional image dataset (iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs) and new optimal image dataset (optimal MD images and 50-keV VMIs), and graded the presence or absence of PDAC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were compared between the two image datasets using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 110 patients (median age, 73 years; 63 men) were included. Among them, 67 patients (61%) had pathologically proven PDAC, and the optimal MD image selected was Silicon/Struvite. The optimal image dataset had higher specificity (88% vs. 81%; P = 0.006), PPV (93% vs. 89%; P < 0.001), and accuracy (94% vs. 92%; P = 0.01) than the conventional image dataset. No difference was found in the sensitivity (P = 0.34) and NPV (P = 0.33) between the two image datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Silicon/Struvite images provided high contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC and higher diagnostic performance for diagnosis of PDAC in combination of 50-keV VMIs compared to iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel silicon-based material decomposition images in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: comparison with iodine-based and 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshifumi Noda, Mayu Hattori, Nobuyuki Kawai, Tetsuro Kaga, Akio Ito, Takuma Ishihara, Toshiharu Miyoshi, Yukiko Takai, Masashi Asano, Hiroki Kato, Fuminori Hyodo, Avinash R Kambadakone, Masayuki Matsuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01856-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the optimal material decomposition (MD) images for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and evaluate the added value of the MD image to 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) by comparing with iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatic protocol dual-energy CT (DECT) between February 2019 and May 2023. First, a radiologist evaluated 702 image datasets generated using 27 different materials to identify the top three MD images which provided maximum contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC, and subsequently, the best MD image was selected based on z value and image quality by four radiologists. Then, another four radiologists independently interpreted the conventional image dataset (iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs) and new optimal image dataset (optimal MD images and 50-keV VMIs), and graded the presence or absence of PDAC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were compared between the two image datasets using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 110 patients (median age, 73 years; 63 men) were included. Among them, 67 patients (61%) had pathologically proven PDAC, and the optimal MD image selected was Silicon/Struvite. The optimal image dataset had higher specificity (88% vs. 81%; P = 0.006), PPV (93% vs. 89%; P < 0.001), and accuracy (94% vs. 92%; P = 0.01) than the conventional image dataset. No difference was found in the sensitivity (P = 0.34) and NPV (P = 0.33) between the two image datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Silicon/Struvite images provided high contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC and higher diagnostic performance for diagnosis of PDAC in combination of 50-keV VMIs compared to iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01856-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01856-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过与碘基图像和50-keV虚拟单能图像(VMIs)的比较,确定诊断胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的最佳物质分解(MD)图像,并评价MD图像对50-keV虚拟单能图像(VMIs)的附加价值。方法:本回顾性研究包括2019年2月至2023年5月期间接受胰腺方案双能CT (DECT)检查的患者。首先,一位放射科医生评估了使用27种不同材料生成的702个图像数据集,以确定正常胰腺和PDAC之间对比度最大的前三张MD图像,随后,四位放射科医生根据z值和图像质量选择最佳MD图像。然后,另外四名放射科医生独立解释传统图像数据集(基于碘的图像和50 kev的VMIs)和新的最佳图像数据集(最佳MD图像和50 kev的VMIs),并对PDAC的存在或不存在进行分级。采用广义估计方程比较两种图像数据集的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。结果:共纳入110例患者(中位年龄73岁,男性63例)。其中67例(61%)患者病理证实为PDAC,选择的最佳MD图像为Silicon/Struvite。结论:硅/鸟鸟石图像在正常胰腺和PDAC之间具有较高的对比差异,与基于碘的图像和50-keV VMIs相比,结合50-keV VMIs诊断PDAC具有更高的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel silicon-based material decomposition images in diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: comparison with iodine-based and 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images.

Objectives: To identify the optimal material decomposition (MD) images for diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and evaluate the added value of the MD image to 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) by comparing with iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent pancreatic protocol dual-energy CT (DECT) between February 2019 and May 2023. First, a radiologist evaluated 702 image datasets generated using 27 different materials to identify the top three MD images which provided maximum contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC, and subsequently, the best MD image was selected based on z value and image quality by four radiologists. Then, another four radiologists independently interpreted the conventional image dataset (iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs) and new optimal image dataset (optimal MD images and 50-keV VMIs), and graded the presence or absence of PDAC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were compared between the two image datasets using generalized estimating equations.

Results: Overall, 110 patients (median age, 73 years; 63 men) were included. Among them, 67 patients (61%) had pathologically proven PDAC, and the optimal MD image selected was Silicon/Struvite. The optimal image dataset had higher specificity (88% vs. 81%; P = 0.006), PPV (93% vs. 89%; P < 0.001), and accuracy (94% vs. 92%; P = 0.01) than the conventional image dataset. No difference was found in the sensitivity (P = 0.34) and NPV (P = 0.33) between the two image datasets.

Conclusion: Silicon/Struvite images provided high contrast difference between normal pancreas and PDAC and higher diagnostic performance for diagnosis of PDAC in combination of 50-keV VMIs compared to iodine-based images and 50-keV VMIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信